Benachrichtigung für 76j4725235b235b891248jv1@googlegroups.com - 25 Nachrichten in 25 Themen

  Zusammenfassung für das heutige Thema

Gruppe: http://groups.google.com/group/76j4725235b235b891248jv1/topics

• Quran & Sunnahs Facebook-Pinnwand: 57. Wir doch haben euch erschaffen; wenn ihr (es) doch für wahr halten würdet!... [1 Aktualisierung]
• Bereit dir die Welt zu Füßen zulegen.s Facebook-Pinnwand: Fang jetzt an zu beten und sage nicht "Ich fange morgen an" - vielleicht wirst d... [1 Aktualisierung]
• Bereit dir die Welt zu Füßen zulegen.s Facebook-Pinnwand: Früher hieß es, er praktiziert und ist ein ehrenhafter Mann; nimm ihn !Heute f... [1 Aktualisierung]
• DİE İDEALE MUSLİMAs Facebook-Pinnwand: VERMEIDE STREIT UND DISKUSSIONEN,,Ich versichere und verspreche ein Haus im Pa... [1 Aktualisierung]
• DİE İDEALE MUSLİMAs Facebook-Pinnwand: Salam alaykumHat jemand vielleicht noch von den alten khimar sets? Die mit den... [1 Aktualisierung]
• Islam - Die wahre Religions Facebook-Pinnwand: [1 Aktualisierung]
• Islam & Liebe - für die Ewigkeits Facebook-Pinnwand: Salamu alaikum, ausser auf seiten poste ich auch in meiner kronik islamische bil... [1 Aktualisierung]
• Die wahre Geschichte der Türkeis Facebook-Pinnwand: -Der Aufstand der armenischen Terroristen in Erzurum im Jahre 1890-Dieser Aufs... [1 Aktualisierung]
• Türken auf der ganzen Welt *-*s Facebook-Pinnwand: Schöne Frauennamen änden mit A :D#Rabia [1 Aktualisierung]
• Die wahre Religions Facebook-Pinnwand: Lies! Infostand in Bremerhaven am 29.06.2013 [1 Aktualisierung]
• Anti Bashar al Assad 2013s Facebook-Pinnwand: Mal ehrlich. Wie kann man von "Menschen" Gnade und Erbarmen für unsere Frauen un... [1 Aktualisierung]
• Confirm your unsubscription from 'Search Facebook salafist' [1 Aktualisierung]
• Search Facebook Schirk: Es ist von Aslu din (Grundlage des islam ) jemanden als muschrik kafir in darul kufr anzusehen bis das gegenteil kommt bis man seine 100% Akida Tauhid festgestellt hatt das er Muslim istAl-Imam Ibnu Qudamah al-Maqdisi sagte: „Denn die Grundlage ist: wer in einem Dar ist, dergehört zu seinen Leuten. Ihr Hukm wird auf ihn angewendet, solange kein Beweis für dasGegenteil gekommen ist." [al-Mughni (5/24)]Ibnu Nujaym sagt:"Die Grundlage ist; dass der jenige, der (alleine) betet, der fastet, der eine unvollkommene Hajj macht, Sadaqa gibtund Gottesdientliche Handlungen macht die auch die jenigen machen die einer anderen Religion angehören, nichtden Hukm des Islaams bekommt. Und auch kann man mit den (Handlungen) wie der Tayammum welcher speziellvon unserer Shari'ah ist -aber nicht von den grundlegenden Gottesdiensten ist- nicht mit dem Islaam urteilen."(al-Mawsuatu-l Quwaytiyya, 1/1380)Imaamnu-n Nawawiyy sagt:"Der Kaafir (aslii) wird nicht als Muslim angesehen (auch wenn) er das Gebet führt (Imaam ist), dem Imaam (imGebet) folgt, alleine, in der Masjid oder wo anders betet, egal wie. Und hierbei ist nicht zu beachten ob er sich imDaaru-l Islaam oder Daaru-l Harb befindet. Das ist die Aussage die von Imaamu-sh Shafi'iyy in "Kitaabu-l Umm"steht."(Sharhu-l Muhadhdhab, 4/252)Al-Imam Ibnu Hazm al-Andalusi sagte: „Das Dar wird auf demjenigen bezogen, der darüber herrscht, darin regiert und es besitzt." [al-Muhalla (11/200)]Shaykh 'Abdul-Hakam al-Qahtani sagte: „Und wir sind überzeugt, dass die scheinbaren Zeichen/Anzeichen/Merkmale des Islam heutzutage nicht herangezogen werden – wie das Salah [=Gebet] und Siyam [=Fasten] und dergleichen, oder wenn jemand sagt, dass er Iman an Allah, Seine Engel, Seine Bücher, die Propheten und den letzten Tag hat, oder derjenige der behauptet auf dem Din des Islam zu sein, so wird er nicht als Muslim (wegen diesem angesehen), bis seine Lossagung vom Schirk und seinen Angehörigen bewiesen ist. Von dieser Angelegenheit ist folgendes:Erstens: Dass die Bedingung für die Annahme der Aussagen und Handlungen einer Person um in den Islam einzutreten, der Punkt der Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk und seinen Angehörigen ist und dies ist das Zeichen, welches aufzeigt, dass er dem Islam folgt, und dieses wird herangezogen um von den Angehörigen des Schirk zu unterscheiden.Auch wenn es ein Zeichen gibt, welches die Angehörigen des Islam und die Angehörigen des Schirk gemeinsam aufweisen (wie das Gebet in der heutigen Zeit), dann darf niemand jemanden auf dieser Basis als Muslim beurteilen – ganz zu schweigen, dass der Verstand ein Beweis für das Gegenteil (dieser Behauptung) ist. Denn die Aussprache von La ilaha illa Allah machte die Muschrikin von Mekka, zu Leuten welche es Sabian sagten [=jemand der den Din seines Volkes verlässt, um in einen anderen Din einzutreten; also hier vom Schirk in den Tawhid] und loyal zum Din von Muhammad, sallallahu 'alaihi wa salam, waren.Also die Aussprache davon (von La ilaha illa Allah) war in dieser Zeit ein Beweis für die Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk und seinen Angehörigen. Doch heutzutage sagen es alle, welche behaupten den Din des Islam zu folgen und sicherlich weisen sie einige oder viele islamische Anzeichen auf. Auch die Herrscher, deren Helfer und ihre Soldaten machen dies (also La ilaha illa Allah sagen etc...). Selbst andere von den Milal [=Religionen] des Schirk machen dieses oder jenes (von den scheinbaren islamischen Anzeichen), wie die Grabanbeter, die Rawafid und dergleichen, welche weit entfernt sind vom Din (des Islam). Aus diesem Grund wird im Din bestimmt, dass der Islam nicht bewiesen wird nur durch die bloße Zuschreibung und Behauptung (zu diesem), sondern die Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk und seinen Angehörigen muss vor dem Urteil des Islam (über eine Person) festgestellt werden.Zweitens: Die Einwohner von Mekka und jene um sie herum, waren auf dem Din von Ibrahim und Ismaʿil. Dann kam Amr ibnu Luhay al-Khuza'iy und schmückte den Schirk für die Menschen aus, und befahl ihnen die Statuen (Götzen) anzubeten. Somit verbreitete sich der Schirk und wurde vorherrschend in den Städten. Als dann der Prophet, sallallahu 'alaihi wa salam, entsandt wurde, beurteilte er sie (also die Menschen, welche behaupteten auf dem Din von Ibrahim zu sein) mit dem Schirk: {Sprich: „Oh ihr Kafirun!"} [109:1] Und er musste nicht berücksichtigen auf was sie sind, von den Überresten der Religion von Ibrahim, um über sie mit dem (Schirk) zu urteilen. Demzufolge urteilte er über sie nicht mit dem Islam, trotz (der Tatsache), dass sie Rituale wie die Hajj, 'Umrah, Tawaf al-Bayt, Sadaqah, Siyam, Ta'dhim al-Bayt al-Haram durchführten und an die Rububiyyah von Allah glaubten, dass Er der Schöpfer und Versorger ist. Noch beurteilte er sie auf dem Islam, weil sie behaupteten auf der Millah [=Gemeinschaft] von Ibrahim zu sein, noch wegen ihrer Prahlerei zu dieser, solange sie sich nicht frei vom Schirk und seinen Angehörigen waren.Also auf die gleiche Weise wie der Prophet, sallallahu 'alaihi wa salam, es nicht als Beweis berücksichtigte für deren Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk und deren Verankerung im (wahren) Din von Ibrahim, welche Rituale sie (auch immer) durchführten und was sie vom Din von Ibrahim geerbt hatten, so sind auch die Rituale heutzutage (wie das Gebet etc.), welche von jenen praktiziert werden, die sich selber dem Islam zuschreiben, kein Beweis für deren Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk, und dass sie auf dem Din von Muhammad, sallallahu 'alaihi wa salam, sind. Drittens: Der Konsens der Sahabah bezüglich ihres Takfir auf die Banu Hanifah von den Anhängern von Musaylamah [=dem falschen Propheten zur Zeit des Propheten Muhammad, sallallahu 'alaihi wa salam] und anderen, wie es bekannt ist, trotz der Tatsache, dass die meisten vom „normalen" Volk waren und die Unwissenden jeden Schrei/Aufruf folgen, und beteten, fasteten und La ilaha illa Allah sagten. Aber all dass verhinderte nicht, dass sie mit Kufr, Schirk und Riddah gegenüber dem Din von Allah beurteilt wurden. Und die Sahabah behandelten alle auf die selbe Art, und urteilten mit dem selben Urteil, und sie trennten und unterschieden nicht zwischen deren Gruppen und deren einzelnen Personen, noch zwischen ihren Großen und Kleinen, noch zwischen deren Gelehrten und den Unwissenden, oder zwischen dem der folgt und dem welchem gefolgt wird. Und sie akzeptierten die Taubah [=Reue] nicht von jemanden, außer er lehnte Musaylamah und seinen Din ab und sagte sich vom Schirk und seinen Angehörigen los. Viertens: Desweiteren gibt es im Buch und der Sunnah keinen einzigen Punkt, welcher darauf hin deutet, dass die erwähnten Zeichen (wie das Gebet usw...) als Beweis für den Islam in jeder Situation herangezogen werden müssen. Die Beweise in der Schariʿah weisen vielmehr darauf hin, dass die Zeichen nur dann berücksichtigt werden, wenn sie ein Beweis für die Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk und seinen Angehörigen sind, und wenn nicht, dann nicht. Weil es von den Kuffar und Muschrikun welche gibt, für die (die Bezeugung von) La ilaha illa Allah ausreichend ist (um in den Islam einzutreten), und es gibt welche, für die es nicht ausreichend ist, außer sie bezeugen dass al-Masih (also ʿIsa, 'alaihi salam) Sein Diener und Sein Gesandter ist, wie bei den Nasara (wenn sie in den Islam eintreten wollen), und es gibt weitere, wo dies nicht ausreicht, außer sie führen die Handlungen des Islam aus, wie der Murtad, welcher das verlassen muss, was der Grund für seine Riddah war (wie das Unterlassen des Gebets etc.) und Taubah macht von dieser und so weiter." [Hadha Dinuna, Seite 13-15] [1 Aktualisierung]
• Search Facebook Schirk: Der Gesandte Allahs (s.a.s) sagte einst zu einem seiner Gefährten:„Lies die Sure Kafirun. Dann schlafe.Denn diese Sure ist die Distanzierung vom Schirk." Abu Dawud [1 Aktualisierung]
• Search Facebook Schirk: Der Gesandte Allahs (s.a.s) sagte einst zu einem seiner Gefährten:„Lies die Sure Kafirun. Dann schlafe. Denn diese Sure ist die Distanzierung vom Schirk." Abu Dawud ( I.D.) [1 Aktualisierung]
• Search Facebook kalifat: Stoppt die finanzielle Unterstützung für die Islamisten....Jetzt.... [1 Aktualisierung]
• Search Facebook kalifat: Liberalizm, libertarianizm, libertynizm - to nie to samo.- [1 Aktualisierung]
• Search Facebook kalifat: Israelischer Soldat boxt eine ältere FrauIsraelischer Soldat boxt eine ältere FrauWas außer dem Kalifat soll dieser Frau ihr Recht wieder bringen?Liken--> https://www.facebook.com/Islamisches.Erwachen [1 Aktualisierung]
• Search Facebook kufr: Eclaircissement de la position de Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb face aux Ottomans.Certains des ennemis de la da'wah salafiyyah ont prétendu que Sheikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb s'était divisé/séparé du Khalifat ottoman et avait ainsi quitté la Djamâ'ah en toute désobéissance.Ibn Faliq décrit le « tawhîd » des suiveurs de la « Da'wah Salafiyyah » [L'appel sur le chemin des Anciens pieux prédécesseurs] de la sorte : « Quant à leur tawhîd, il comprend le fait de sortir contre les musulmans...et ceci est de la mécréance , non du tawhîd ».S'adressant à eux [aux Wahhabites], 'Omar Al-Mahjoub a dit : « ...et vous êtes tombés dans la désobéissance ». Ibn 'Abidîn dans son commentaire a décrit les suiveurs de cette da'wah comme étant des « Khawaridjs », sous le chapitre intitulé : « Les injustes/oppresseurs (al boughât) », et ce sont ceux qui vont contre l'obéissance due à l'Imâm, sans aucune preuve [pour faire cela]. [1]Dahlan prétend que les suiveurs de SHeikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb : « ...se sont émancipés de la Djamâ'ah ». [2]Az-Zahawî prétend de même qu'ils sont connus pour : « .. Déserter l'obéissance dûe au Amîr al-Mou'minîn [Emir des croyants] ».Bien des ennemis de la da'wah ont décrit le Sheikh et ses suiveurs comme des Khawaridjs, car l'un des attributs des Khawaridjs est qu'ils sortent contre l'Imâm des musulmans, et ils deviennent désobéissants aussitôt qu'ils observent des péchés de cet Imâm, qui sont largement moindres que des « Kufr Akbar » [grande mécréance].Et ceci est illustré par ce que Al-Amlî dit : « Les Khawaridjs ont rendu le combat contre les rois des musulmans et le fait de sortir contre eux, permis.... de même les Wahhabites ».L'auteur du livre « Résumé de l'Histoire des Arabes » inclut un chapitre dans son livre intitulé : « L'insurrection des Wahhabites contre l'obéissance ».Abd ul-Qadim prétend que l'apparition du Wahhabismes fut l'une des raisons derrière la chute du Khalifa ; il dit : « Les Wahhabites ont fondé un état au sein même de l'Etat Islamique, sous le commandement de Muhammad Ibn Sa'oud, puis de son fils Abdel 'Aziz. L'Angleterre les a soutenus avec des armes et de l'argent, et, basés sur l'idéologie, ils se sont mis en avant dans la conquête de terres islamiques qui étaient sous le contrôle de Sultans, en d'autres termes, ils ont brandi l'épée contre le Calife et assassiné l'armée musulmane, l'armée du Amîr al-Mou'minîn [Emir des Croyants] par le biais de l'instigation et du soutien de l'Angleterre ».Et avant de commencer à répondre aux accusations portées contre Sheikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb de révolte contre le Calife, il est bon de mentionner ce que le SHeikh tenait comme croyance nécessitant l'obéissance à l'Imâm des musulmans, qu'ils soient des hommes pieux ou des pécheurs, sauf s'ils ordonnent une désobéissance à Allah, car l'obéissance envers eux ne s'engage que dans les choses qui sont bonnes. Le « Sheikh » dit dans sa lettre adressée aux gens de Qassîm : « Et je tiens pour croyance l'obligation de se soummettre et d'être obéissant envers les Imams des mouslims, ceux qui sont droits tout comme ceux qui sont pécheurs parmi eux, tant qu'ils n'ordonnent pas une désobéissance à Allâh, et envers la personne responsable du Khalifa . Celui autour duquel les gens se sont réunis et l'ont accepté, de même que celui qui a forcé son chemin pour devenir Calife, l'obéissance envers lui est obligatoire, et se révolter contre lui est « harâm » [interdit] ».Il dit également :« La troisième base : afin de rendre notre résumé complet, nous devons écouter et obéir à ceux qui nous dirigent, même s'il est un esclave Abissin, et Allâh a expliqué ceci complètement dans de nombreuses formes d'explications, législatives et destinées [note du traducteur : révélation du destin] - [3], et cette base est devenue inconnue à bon nombre de ceux qui prétendent avoir de la science, sans jamais se soucier de la mettre en pratique. »En répondant à de telles allégations, une question se doit d'être posée : le Nadj, fut-il le lieu de base de ce mouvement, sous le contrôle du « Khalifat Ottoman » ?Dr Sâlih al-'Ubud répond :« En général, le « Nadj » n'a jamais été témoin de la souveraineté des Ottomans, car leur pouvoir ne l'a jamais atteint, ni leurs gouverneurs, et à aucun moment précédant l'époque de Sheikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb un drapeau Turk n'y fut mis en berne. Ce qui prouve cette réalité est la lecture faite à travers la division des contrées que les Ottomans gouvernaient. Un traité établi par Yamin 'Ali Afandî [qui fut le trésorier du livre Hanaqî en l'an 1018H/1609], et intitulé « Les lois des Ottomans/ les contenus du livre de Diwan », révèle qu' à partir du onzième siècle, le Khilafa Ottoman se divisa en deux parties distinctes (iyala), et les quatorze qui en composent chacune sont arabes, et le Nadj n'est pas inclus dans celles-ci, excepté pour « Al-Ihsa », si on devait le considérer comme faisant partie du Nadj. »Sheikh 'Abdullâh Al-'Uthaymîne dit :« Avant que surgisse l'appel de Sheikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb , le Nadj n'était pas sous domination directe des Ottomans, ni n'a été témoin d'aucune souveraineté d'eux dans une de ses parties. Bani Jabr, Bani Khalid, et les Sharif n'étaient point des souverains, et les conflits armés entre tribus du Nadj étaient de coutume. »Dr Ajil an-Nashmî dit :« Le Khilâfa ne prêtait pas attention au Nadj et a ses territoires voisins. Cette ligne de conduite peut être attribuée à l'immensité du Nadj d'une part, et d'autre part à la présence de la fragmentation tribale en son sein ».Ce qui prouve que la position du SHeikh était bonne et que le Sheikh n'a pas hésité quant au fait que son mouvement n'était pas lié au Khilâfa est la lettre envoyée à Fadil Al-Mazid , le gouverneur du désert Syrien :« Cette chose qu'ils ont désapprouvée de moi, qu'ils ont détestée de moi et qui a créé l'inimitié entre eux et moi, s'ils interrogent quelque savant que ce soit en Syrie ou au Yémen ou autres dessus, ces derniers diront : c'est la vérité et c'est la religion d'Allâh et de Son messager (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam). Cependant, je ne puis la rendre publique dans ma contrée car l'état ne l'approuve pas", et Ibn 'Abd el-Wahhâb put le faire car le gouverneur de sa contrée ne l'a pas désapprouvé, plutôt, lorsqu'il sut la vérité, il la suivit..Quant aux allégations de « dhulm » [injustice, tyrannie, oppression] comme quoi le mouvement de SHeikh fut l'une des raisons pour la chute du Khilâfa, et que les Anglais aidèrent les Wahhabites à atteindre ce but, alors Muhammad Mahdi al-Istanbulî répond à cette piètre accusation :« Il incombe à cet auteur d'appuyer son opinion avec des preuves, et , dans le passé, le poète a dit : si les accusations ne sont pas basées sur des preuves/ des textes, alors c'est une preuve de sottise. Au contraire, l'Histoire révèle que les Anglais furent opposés à ce mouvement dès le départ, craignant un renouveau du monde islamique ».Al-Istanbulî dit aussi :« Il est étrange, à la fois amusant et désolant que cet auteur accuse le mouvement du SHeikh d'être l'une des causes de la chute du Khalifat ottoman. Il est inutile de dire que ce mouvement fut fondé en l'an 1811, et que le Khalifat fut détruit l'année 1922. »Et ce qui prouve que les Anglais étaient contre le mouvement Wahhabites est qu'ils envoyèrent leur capitaine Foster Saddler afin de féliciter Ibrahim Pasha de la victoire qu'il avait obtenue sur les Wahhabites - désignant là la bataille de Dar'iyyah - et de confirmer également combien enclin ce dernier était à coopérer avec le British Act contre le piratage des Wahhabites dans le Golf Arabic [des attaques/kidnapping extrêmement agressifs envers des vaisseaux anglais Royaux qui parcouraient le Golf et l'Océan indien transportant les trésors d'Inde vers l'Empire étaient menés par des centres Wahhabites connus sur la côte du Golf - qui , jusqu'aussi récemment que dans les années 50, était désigné sur les cartes internationales comme la côte des pirates - tel que Sharjah et Rasoul-Khaymah].Bien plus, cette lettre affirme clairement l'intention du gouvernement britannique de créer un accord avec Ibrahim Pasha, dans l'intention d'annihiler le contrôle des Wahhabites.Sheikh Mohammad Ibn Mandthour an-Nawmanî dit :« Les Anglais ont utilisé la position en Inde qui s'opposait à Sheikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb afin de lancer à quiconque s'opposait à eux le label de " Wahhabite". Et de cette façon, les Anglais appelèrent les savants de la ville de Déonband en Inde les Wahhabites, dû à leur opposition aux anglais ».Plutôt, le prêtre Zuimer mentionna que les Wahhabites en Inde ne propageaient pas leur dogme car l'appel au Djihâd contre les anglais leur était attribué. [4][1] Hâshiyah Ibn-'Abidîn - 4/262.[2] ad-Durar us-Sunniyyah fir-Radd al-Wahhâbiyyah - pg. 23[3] Hadith n°28, arba'în an-nawawiyah[4] Kitab Réfutation des accusations des opposants à la da'wah de Muhammad Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb [1 Aktualisierung]
• Search Facebook kufr: Duniya ka sab say aasan kaam...... Doosroon par kufr kay fatway lagana...... :) Aur Fatway Lga kar Khud Kufriya Kamoon ki Bharmaar kar dena,,, Baba [1 Aktualisierung]
• Search Facebook kufr: Six Kalimas in English Tajveed1) Kalma Tayyab: Laa ilaaha illal Lahoo Mohammadur Rasool Ullah2) Kalma Shaadat: Ashahado An Laa ilaaha illal Laho Wahdahoo Laa Shareeka Lahoo Wa Ash Hado Anna Mohammadan Abdo Hoo Wa Rasoolohoo.3) Kalma Tamjeed: Subhanallahe Wal Hamdulillahe Wa Laa ilaha illal Laho Wallahooakbar. Wala Haola Wala Quwwata illa billahil AliYil Azeem.4) Kalma Tauheed: Laa ilaha illal Lahoo Wahdahoo Laa Shareekalahoo Lahul Mulko Walahul Hamdo Yuhee Wa Yumeeto Wa Hoa Haiy Yul La Yamooto Abadan Abada Zul Jalali Wal ikraam Beyadihil Khair. Wa hoa Ala Kulli Shai In Qadeer.5) Kalma Astaghfar: Astaghfirullah Rabbi Min Kullay Zambin Aznabtuho Amadan Ao Khat An Sirran Ao Alaniatan Wa Atoobo ilaihe Minaz Zambil Lazee Aalamo Wa Minaz Zambil Lazee La Aalamo innaka Anta Allamul Ghuyoobi Wa Sattaarul Oyobi Wa Ghaffaruz Zunoobi Wala Haola Wala Quwwata illa billahil AliYil Azeem.6) Kalma Radde Kufr: Allah Humma inni Aaoozubika Min An Oshrika Beka Shai Aown Wa Anaa Aalamo Behi Wa Astaghfiroka Lima laa Aalamo Behi Tubtu Anho Wa Tabarrato Minal Kufri Washshirki Wal Kizbi Wal Jheebati Wal Bidaati Wan Nameemati Wal Fawahishi Wal Bohtani Wal Maasi Kulliha Wa Aslamtoo Wa Aamantoo Wa Aqoolo Laa ilaaha illal Lahoo Mohammadur Rasool Ullah.انگریزی میں چھ Kalimas Tajveed1) Kalma طیب: لاالہ illal Lahoo Mohammadur رسول اللہ2) Kalma Shaadat: Ashahado ایک لاالہ illal Laho Wahdahoo لا الہ Shareeka Lahoo و راھ Hado ینا محمڈن Abdo Rasoolohoo و ہو.3) Kalma Tamjeed: Subhanallahe وال Hamdulillahe و لا الہ الہ الا اللہ illal Laho Wallahooakbar. والا Haola والا Quwwata الا billahil AliYil عظیم.4) Kalma Tauheed: لا الہ الہ الا اللہ illal Lahoo Wahdahoo لا الہ Shareekalahoo Lahul Mulko Walahul Hamdo Yuhee و Yumeeto و ہوآ Haiy Yul لا Yamooto آبادان Abada جسے جلالی وال ikraam Beyadihil خیر. قدیر میں ہوآ و اعلی Kulli Shai.5) Kalma Astaghfar: Astaghfirullah ربی من Kullay Zambin Aznabtuho Amadan AO Khat ایک Sirran AO Alaniatan و Atoobo ilaihe Minaz Zambil Lazee Aalamo و Minaz Zambil Lazee لا Aalamo innaka Anta Allamul Ghuyoobi و Sattaarul Oyobi و Ghaffaruz Zunoobi والا Haola والا Quwwata الا billahil AliYil عظیم.6) Kalma Radde کفر: اللہ ہما inni Aaoozubika کم سے کم ایک Oshrika Beka Shai Aown و Anaa Aalamo Behi و Astaghfiroka لیما لا Aalamo Behi Tubtu Anho و Tabarrato Minal Kufri Washshirki وال Kizbi وال Jheebati وال Bidaati وان Nameemati وال Fawahishi وال Bohtani وال Maasi Kulliha و Aslamtoo و Aamantoo و Aqoolo لاالہ illal Lahoo Mohammadur رسول اللہ. [1 Aktualisierung]
• Search Facebook kufr: Six Kalimas in English Tajveed 1) Kalma Tayyab: Laa ilaaha illal Lahoo Mohammadur Rasool Ullah 2) Kalma Shaadat: Ashahado An Laa ilaaha illal Laho Wahdahoo Laa Shareeka Lahoo Wa Ash Hado Anna Mohammadan Abdo Hoo Wa Rasoolohoo. 3) Kalma Tamjeed: Subhanallahe Wal Hamdulillahe Wa Laa ilaha illal Laho Wallahooakbar. Wala Haola Wala Quwwata illa billahil AliYil Azeem. 4) Kalma Tauheed: Laa ilaha illal Lahoo Wahdahoo Laa Shareekalahoo Lahul Mulko Walahul Hamdo Yuhee Wa Yumeeto Wa Hoa Haiy Yul La Yamooto Abadan Abada Zul Jalali Wal ikraam Beyadihil Khair. Wa hoa Ala Kulli Shai In Qadeer. 5) Kalma Astaghfar: Astaghfirullah Rabbi Min Kullay Zambin Aznabtuho Amadan Ao Khat An Sirran Ao Alaniatan Wa Atoobo ilaihe Minaz Zambil Lazee Aalamo Wa Minaz Zambil Lazee La Aalamo innaka Anta Allamul Ghuyoobi Wa Sattaarul Oyobi Wa Ghaffaruz Zunoobi Wala Haola Wala Quwwata illa billahil AliYil Azeem. 6) Kalma Radde Kufr: Allah Humma inni Aaoozubika Min An Oshrika Beka Shai Aown Wa Anaa Aalamo Behi Wa Astaghfiroka Lima laa Aalamo Behi Tubtu Anho Wa Tabarrato Minal Kufri Washshirki Wal Kizbi Wal Jheebati Wal Bidaati Wan Nameemati Wal Fawahishi Wal Bohtani Wal Maasi Kulliha Wa Aslamtoo Wa Aamantoo Wa Aqoolo Laa ilaaha illal Lahoo Mohammadur Rasool Ullah. [1 Aktualisierung]
• Search Facebook kufr: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBEG3t5t6Ns [1 Aktualisierung]
• Search Facebook kufr: SHI'ISM? WHO ARE THE SHIA? Shi'isms fundamental basis--the cornerstone of its religion--is its principle of reviling, abusing and rejecting the Sahaabah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). The murderers of Hadhrat Uthmaan (Radiallahu Anhu) realized that their politically and nafsaani inspired movement can never be successful as long as the authority of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam's) Sahaabah is retained. They had, therefore, no alternative other than raising the structure of Shi'ism on the basis of opinion which necessitated the denial of the authority of the Companions of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). They thus propagated the doctrine of the rejection of the Sahaabah with brutal blasphemy, conspiracy, murder,. fraud and fabrication of statements which they shamelessly attributed to Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Their religion is based on the vilification of those whom Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) loved so dearly and whose authority is established, not on the basis of opinion and love, but on the basis of Divine Directive. Without the Sahaabah there can be no Islam, no Quraan, no Sunnah, no Shariah, no Imaan. The Deen of Allah Ta'ala came to us and to all and will continue to travel to the end of time by means of Naql (authoritative and authentic narration), the first link in the chain of narration and transmission joining us with Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) being the noble Sahaabah. But, Shi'ism has broken that very first and vital link with Nabi-e-Kareern. They thus have no Shar'i authority and no Shar'i proof for their beliefs of the nafs. The way they have sought to overcome this hurdle is by their doctrine of fabricating ahadith to substantiate their claims. Nifaaq or hypocrisy is a principle of the Shi'i religion. They technically term such hypocrisy as taqiyah which means the permissibility to conceal one's true beliefs for the sake of any expediency. Thus they attribute even such hypocrisy to Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu). It is the Shi'i belief that although Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) believed that Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma) usurped the Khilafat and deliberately betrayed Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi Wasallam), he nevertheless pledged loyalty to these senior Sahaabah on account of some political expediency. This blatant baatil and blasphemy attributed to Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) exhibits the crookedness of Shi'i mentality. The Shiahs who have gone out of their way to belittle the Sahaabah and to drop them from the pedestal of authority which the Shariah assigns to them can never be the lovers of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) nor can Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) have love for such miscreants of belief. About such hatred for his Sahaabah, Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: "Those who hate the Sahaabah, hate them because (in reality) they hate me." It is a Shi'i contention that the great Sahaabah, especially Hadhrat Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthmaan, etc. (Radiallahu Anhum) did not understand the teachings of Nabi-e-Kareern (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). They further shamelessly and blasphemously assert that these illustrious Khulafa Raashideen are usurpers, frauds, fabricators of ahadith and wholly incompetent in Deeni matters. Indeed, the La'nat of Allah Ta'ala must be on such slanderers as the Shi'i clergy who make such wicked assertions. Inspite of their slander being shocking and despicable in the extreme, it is not surprising, since they are the worst fabricators and frauds peddling their nafsaani opinions in the name of Islam and attributing it to Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). They have accused the Sahaabah of being involved in conspiracies to eliminate Islam and supplant it with the Arab tribal systems of the time of jaahiliyyah. The blasphemous drivel which clutters their books and preachings exhibits their wickedness and detestation for the Islam of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Inspite of the open venom which the Shiahs spit against the Sahaabah, the ignorant supporters of the Shiahs among the Ahle Sunnah expect the Ulama to raise slogans of brotherhood and to fabricate a common basis and a common platform of fraternity with the haters of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam's) Companions. They expect the Ummah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) to unite with those whose very religion is reared on hatred for the Sahaabah. No, that can never come to pass. The enemies of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam's) Sahaabah can never be the friends and the brothers of the Ahle Sunnah. There is no apologetism in our capital for such Ventures. We know of no diplomacy and recognize no expediency for such vile brotherhood. If unity and brotherhood with all and sundry are of such importance, let the supporters of the Shi'i clergy advocate unity and brotherhood with shaitaan and Qaadianism as well. We unequivocally maintain that those (the Shiahs) who claim that Hadhrat Zubair, Talha and Aishah (Radiallahu Anhum) are jahannami (inmates of the fire) are our enemies. In fact, they Themselves are jahannami. Only those standing in line to be condemned to Jahannam can be so shameless as to say that these illustrious Sahaabah among the Ash'arah Mubashsharah and the beloved wife of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) are jahannami. May Allah Ta'ala save us from uttering such kufr. Muslims should now realize that it is haraam to support in any way the Shiahs. Support for Khomeini and the Shi'i clergy is support offered to the enemies of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Shi'ism falls within the purview of the following statements of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam): "My Ummah will be split into 73 sects. Of these, all but one, will be in the Fire." (Tirmizi) What does the intelligence and lmaan of Muslims direct and conclude? Does the Imaan of a Mu'min opine that the Shiahs are in the Naaji (that which will be saved) group or the Sahaabah? Will the Sahaabah be in the one sect which will go to Jannat or in the 72 sects condemned to hell? Will the Shiahs be dispatched to Jannat and Hadhrat Aishah, Zubair, Talha, Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthmaan (Radiallahu Anhum) to Jahannum as the Shi'i clergy asserts? What does your Imaan tell you? Who will be in Jahannum? The beloved wives and Sahabah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) or the Shi'i clergy. KHOMEINI'S DECLARATION "The Islamic and non-Islamic powers of the world will not admit our power till such time that we establish our hold over Makkah and Madinah because these are the centers and citadels of Islam. Hence our domination over these places Is an essential requirement ... when as a conqueror I will enter Makkah and Madinah, the first thing to be done at that time by me would be to dig out two idols (Abu Bakr and Umar) lying by the side of the Prophet's grave." (Ayatullah Khomeini of Iran, while addressing a message for a youth rally). Khomeinism and Islam, page 8 by Abu Rehan Farooqi This statement mirrors the attitude of hatred and contempt which Khomeini and his Shiahs cherish in particular for Ameerul Mu'mineen Sayyidina Abu Bakr and Ameerul Mu'mineen Sayyidina Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma), and about all the Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum) in general. While this is the vile and abominable attitude of Khomeini towards the illustrious Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum) of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), the Qur'an-e-Kareem states the attitude of Imaan in the following words: "Muhammad is the Rasool of Allah, and those who are with him (i. e. the Sahabah) are stern against the kuffar and tender among themselves. You will see them (the Sahabah) in Ruku' and Sajdah searching for the grace of Allah and (His) Pleasure. Their sign is on their faces because of the impression of (abundance of) Sajdah... " (Surah Fath). Most certainly, Allah was well pleased with the Mu'mineen (i.e. the Sahabah) when they took the oath of allegiance to you (0 Muhammad!) under the tree... (Surah Fath) "And the early ones, the first one among the Muhajireen and Ansar and those who follow them (the Muhajireen and Ansar) in virtue, Allah is well pleased with them and they are well pleased with Him. Allah has prepared for them gardens beneath which flow rivers; therein will they dwell forever. Indeed, that is the great victory. " (SurahTaubah) This is what the Qur'an says regarding the Sahabah, but the Shiah priests brand the Muhajireen and Ansar as kafir, murtad and munafiq! Nauthubillah! And, Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said about the Sahabah: "Fear Allah! Fear Allah regarding my Sahabah. Thus, whoever loves them, does so because of my love; whoever hates them, does so because of my hatred." It is thus abundantly clear that Khomeini cherishes a dislike, an aversion, a hatred for the Sahabah because of his hatred for Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). The closer a Sahaabi was to Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), the viler the abuse and the greater the enmity the Shiahs demonstrate for him. The noble Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum) are the foundation and the pivots of Islam. The entire basis and superstructure of Islam have been magnificently raised on the teachings, explanations and expositions of the Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum). The Qur'an Majeed itself has been authentically and authoritatively transmitted to the Ummah down the centuries in the form presented by the illustrious Sahabah - by Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthmaan (Radiallahu Anhum), the prime targets of Shi'i and Khomeini vituperation. An abundance of Shi'i propaganda on the instructions of Khomeini is being churned out by Iran. Such propaganda conducted under hollow and hypocritical slogans such as (There is no Shi'ism and no Sunnism), is designed to mislead the Ummah of Islam into acceptance of the Shi'i religion. Ignorance of what Shi'ism is, has constrained many Muslims to incline towards Khomeini and Shi'ism. But, it shall, Insha Allah, be shown that the vociferous "Islamic" slogans trumpeted by Khomeini and the Shi'i priests are mere outer and superficial facades behind which lurk the darkness of kufr. In fact, the intensity of Khomeini's and Shiah kufr is worse than the kufr of the Qadianis and other baatil sects since the Shi'i religion is reared on hatred for the Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum). Without such hatred, there is no Shi'ism. Hatred for the Sahabah, which is an overt and conspicuous facet of Shi'ism, is a doctrine of fundamental importance in the Shiah religion. It is inconceivable to be a Shiah without subscribing to the doctrine of aversion for and vituperation of the noble Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum) of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). To open the eyes of the Sunni brethren of ours, who have been deceived by Khomeini's propaganda machinery, we shall present here the views of the Shi'i religion - views and statements extracted from the authoritative books of theology of the Shi'i religion. SHI'ISM AND THE SAHABAH The most authentic book of theology of Shi'ism is Al-Jamiul Kafi. In this book in the section, Kitabur Raudha', the following narration is attributed to the fifth Shi', Imam: "After Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) all people became murtads (reneged from Islam) except three persons - Miqdad Bin Aswad, Abu Tharr Ghifari and Salman Farsi Radiallahu Anhum wabarakatuhum). " In the Shi'i book, Kitabur Raudhah, the following narration is attributed to Imam Baqir who allegedly made the statement in reply to his disciple who had sought the Imam's opinion regarding Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma) "What are you asking me about them (Abu Bakr and Umar)? Whoever among us (i.e. the Ahle Bait or the progeny of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) departed from this world, departed in a state of extreme displeasure with them. The elders among us admonished the younger ones to perpetuate it (i.e. this displeasure with Abu Bakr and Umar), Verily, the two of them have unjustly usurped our right. By Allah! These two were the first to settle on our necks (i.e. the necks of the Ahle Bait). Therefore, may the la'nat (curse) of Allah, the Malaikah and of mankind be on the two of them. (Kitabur Raudhah, Page 115) In the same book, on the same page appears the following: "Verily. these two elders (Abu Bakr and Umar) departed from this world without having made taubah for what they had perpetrated against Ameerul Mumineen Alayhis Salaam. In fact, they did not even think of us (of their wrongs against Hadhrat Ali). Therefore, the la'nat of Allah, the Malaikah and of mankind be on them." In the Shiah book, Rijal Kashi, Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma) are denigrated in the following narration attributed to Imam Baqir: "Whatever murder is committed in Islam, whatever unlawful wealth is earned and whatever adultery is committed until the appearance of our Imam Mahdi - the sin of all this is on the necks of the two (i.e. Abu Bakr and Umar). (Rijal Kashi, page 135) In Kitabur Raudhah on pages 159/160, the Shiahs attribute a narration to Hadhrat Salman Farsi (Radiallahu Anhu) in which it is claimed that on the occasion when the oath of allegiance was given to Hadhrat Abu Bakr (Radiallahu Anhu), the first person to swear allegiance to him was an old man who stepped forward crying: "All praise to Allah who has not caused me to die yet, enabling me to see you on this pedestal. Stretch your hand. " Thus he (Abu Bakr) stretched his hand and the old man took the oath of allegiance (at his hand)." According to the narration, when Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) heard this from Hadhrat Salman (Radiallahu Anhu), he asked: "Do you know who he (the old man who took the oath of allegiance) is?" When Salman (Radiallahu Anhu) replied in the negative, Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) allegedly said: "That was Iblees, Allah has cursed him." Thus, according to Shi'ism, the first being who accepted the Khilafat of Hadhrat Abu Bakr (Radiallahu Anhu) was Iblees who placed his hand in the hand of Hadhrat Abu Bakr (Radiallahu Anhu). At the end of this narration in Kitabur Raudhah, the following words are attributed by the Shi'i priests to Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). "Then, they (a group of the Saqeefah Bani Saidah) will come to the Musjid (i.e. Musjid-e-Nabawi) and the first to swear allegiance to him (i.e. Abu Bakr) on my Mimbar will be Iblees, the La'nat of Allah on him. Iblees will appear (on that occasion) in the form of an old man and say so (i.e. what Salman Faarsi has allegedly said)." Mullah Baqir Majlisi is a renowned personality in Shiah circles. He is regarded as a top-ranking Muhaddith. He flourished in the 10th century of the Hijri era. The Shi'i clergy has accorded him the title, Khatamul Muhadditheen (the seal of the Muhadditheen). His works are regarded as highly authoritative by the Shiah priests. Khomeini has praised and recommended his writings. This Shi'i priest, in his books, writes the following statements whenever he mentions the name of Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) "Umar Bin Khattab - on him be la'nat (curse) and athab (punishment). This, then is the Shi'i attitude towards the beloved Sahabah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). This Mullah Baqir Majlisi has mentioned in his book, Zadul Ma'ad, numerous virtues and excellencies of the 9th of Rabiul Awwal. According to Baqir Majlisi, the significance and excellence of 9th Rabiul Awwal are because "Umar, the enemy of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the enemy of the Ahle Bait" will be killed on the 9th Rabiul Awwal. It is for this reason that the 9th of Rabiul Awwal should be observed as a great occasion of happiness and festivity according to Shi'ism. The relevant part of this fabricated narration attributed by the Shiah to the famous Sahaabi, Hadhrat Huzaifah (Radiallahu Anhu) is as follows: "Huziifah Bin Yaman narrates: Once on the 9th of Rabiul Awwal I went to Rasulullah. I saw Ameerul Mu'mineen Ali Murtaza, Imam Hasan and Imam Husain also there. All were busy eating. Rasulullah smiling in great happiness said to Hasan and Husain: 'Sons, today is the day on which Allah will destroy your enemy and the enemy of your grandfather, and Allah will accept the curse of your mother (Fatimah). Eat sons, eat I Today is the day that Allah accepts the deeds of your Shiah (partisans), and beloved. Eat sons, eat! Today is the day when the power of your enemy and the enemy of your grandfather will be broken and annihilated in the dust. Eat sons, eat! Today is the day when Fir'on to my Ahle Bait, the one who will oppress and persecute them and who will usurp their rights, will be destroyed." Huzaifah said: I exclaimed: 'O Rasulullah! Will there be such an evil person in your Ummah, who will perpetrate such villainy?' Rasulullah replied: 'O Huzaifah! Among the munafiqs (hypocrites) there will be one idol who will be the leader of the group of munafiqeen. He will carry in his hand the whip of cruelty and injustice; he will prevent people from the Path of truth; he will alter the Qur'an; he will change my Sunnah and my ways; he will oppress my Wasi (Appointee), Ali Bin Abi Talib and he will deprive my daughter, Fatimah of her rights. My daughter will then curse him. Allah Ta'ala will accept her la'nat (curse) and prayers.' Huzaifah then said: 'O Rasulullah! Why do you not supplicate to Allah to destroy this Fir'on and oppressor in your very lifetime?' Rasulullah replied: 'O Huzaifah! I do not regard it proper to interfere in the decisions of Allah Ta'ala... But, I have requested Allah Ta'ala to grant excellence and superiority to that day when that oppressor and Fir'on is dispatched to Jahannum (e.i. when he is destroyed). That day should be decreed superior to all other days so that honoring of that day becomes a Sunnah for my Shiane Ahle Bait (i.e. partisans of my family). Allah Ta'ala then sent this Wahi (revelation): 'It has already been decreed in My Eternal Knowledge that the usurping Munafiqs will persecute you and your family. They will inflict many hardships on you and your family. O Muhammad! Ali has been awarded your rank because of these (impending) hardships which will be perpetrated on him by the usurper of his rights and the Fir'on of this Ummah. I have commanded the angels of the seven heavens to rejoice and celebrate Eid on the day he (i.e. Hadhrat Umar) is killed - this is for the sake of the partisans and lovers of the Ahle Bait. I have commanded the recording Angels to cease recording the sins of My servants for three days from that day. This is in honor of that day (on which Hadhrat Umar will be murdered). O Muhammad! Three days grace and permission in general to commit sins have been given in your honor and in honor of your appointee (Ali) ... Every year on this day, will I free from Jahannam thousands of your Shiahs.' Huzaifah says: 'After Rasulullah said this, he arose and left the room and went to the house of Umme Salmah. After having heard this talk of Rasulullah I was convinced of Umar's kufr. There remained no doubt in this. Finally, after the demise of Rasulullah, I witnessed the fitnah which he (Umar) created. He exhibited the kufr which was concealed in him. He reneged from Islam and usurped the Imamate and Khilafate. To achieve this end he adopted the most shameless methods. He altered the Qur'an and burnt the holy house of Rasulullah. He pleased the Jews, Christians and the Magians and displeased Fatimah and the entire Ahle Bait, and he conspired to have Ameerul Mu'meen (i.e. Hadhrat Ali) murdered. He made haram what Allah had made halal and legalized what Allah had made unlawful. He slammed the door against the face and stomach of Fatimah Alayhis Salaam. Huzaifah then said: 'Finally Allah Ta'ala accepted the curses of His Holy Nabi and his daughter in regard to this Munafiq (i.e. Hadhrat Umar) and had him killed at the hands, of his killer (Abu Lu'lu' Irani). May there be the Rahmat (Mercy) of Allah on his (Umar's) killer." (Zadul Ma'ad - Pages 433-436) Needless to say, this whole narration, from beginning to end, is a colossal fabrication of the Shiah enemies of the Sahabah in general, and of the first three Khulafa (Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthmaan) in particular. Shi'i priests are notorious for the fabrication of narration's which they impute to such great men of Islam, whom they describe as their "Imaams", when in actual fact, they (the so-called Imaams of the Shiahs) were august personalities of the Ahl-e- Sunnah wal Jam'at. The salient features of batil stated in the aforementioned fabrication are: 1. Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu), the second Khalifah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) was a kafir. 2. Not only was Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) a kafir, but a munafiq. 3. Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) was the leader of the Munafiqeen (hypocrites). 4. Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Ahle Bait had cursed Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu). 5. Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had prayed for the murder of Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu). 6. Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) had altered and interpolated the Qur'an Shareef. 7. Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) was a cruel oppressor, unjust and a usurper. 8. Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) prevented others from Imaan and Islam. 9. Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) conspired to murder Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu). 10. The day on which Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu), was murdered by the Persian kafir, Lu'lu', is the most auspicious day of the year. 11. The Rahmat of Allah is on the Kafir murderer of Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu). 12. The day when Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) was killed is such an occasion of rejoicing that Allah Ta'ala declared the permissibility of sinning for three consecutive days. That is, each year for three days from the date of Umar's murder, Shiahs are permitted to fornicate, consume alcohol, steal and commit all sins and crimes with complete equanimity since sins are not recorded in these three days. These are the abominable teachings of Shi'ism regarding the illustrious Ameerul Mu'mineen. Hadhrat Umar Ibn Khattab (Radiallahu Anhu) about whom Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: "If there had to be a Nabi after me, it would have been Umar. "The sternest in the Law of Allah is Umar. " Nahjul Balaaghah, the highest theological book of the Shiahs have this to say about Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma). "Boldly and unscrupulously he (i.e. Hadhrat Abu Bakr) and his successor (i.e. Hadhrat Umar), each in turn, pillaged and plundered the wealth of the community leaving the state in such sadly injured condition that the passage of time was increasing the intensity of the injury,.. But, it was carried on under the guise of law and order and many unacceptable excuses were offered to justify these irreligious and ungodly arrogation's and many more will be repeated in the future. " The Shi'i priest Muhammad Baqir Sadr writes about the Sahabah in general and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) in particular: "... we find that it is necessary to accept the existence of a large trend, from the very lifetime of the Prophet, who inclined towards proposing the use of Ijtihad and circumstantial considerations in determining their interests, above strict adherence to the religious texts. " "This trend was represented by a daring group of important Companions like, Umar bin-al-Khattab, who disputed with the Messenger and made judgements contradicting the text in many subjects, believing that he had the right to do so." The type of 'Ijtihad' which the Shiahs attribute to Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu), in particular, and to other Sahaabah, in general, is described in the following statement of Baqir Sadr: "...we mean by 'ijtihad' the making of judgements in contradiction to the text or acceptance of such a judgement." A king who pillages and plunders the wealth of a nation is supposed to lead a life of luxury-living in palatial mansions and palaces; relaxing in gardens and orchards; adorning himself in garments of silk, velvet and brocade; indulging in sumptuous feasts and extravagance. But history bears loud testimony to the austere, simple, in fact, life of extreme poverty led by our Ameerul Mu'mineen, Sayyidina Umar Farooq (Radiallahu Anhu). A dozen patches adorned his kurtah of coarse cloth. The frugality and austerity of Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) have already attained proverbial significance. The most ardent Sunni sympathizer of Khomeini will not fail in acknowledging this glaring historical fact. Yet the Shi'i priests accuse a Saint of such high, faultless and sterling attributes of having pillaged and plundered the wealth of the Ummah! HaqquI Yaqeen is another very highly placed book of Shi'i theology. The author of Haqqul Yaqeen is the same Mullah Baqir Majlisi, author of Zadul Ma'ad from which the lengthy fabricated narration (mentioned earlier) has been cited. In his book HaqquI Yaqeen, Baqi Majlisi cites a very lengthy narration in which Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma) are subjected to extreme vilification. Some excerpts from this fabricated narration of vilification are reproduced here. "After Makkah Muazzamah, Imam Mehdi will proceed to Madinah, the city of our grandfather, Rasulullah. At Madinah, he (Imam Mehdi) will demonstrate an astonishing act which will be a cause of great happiness for the Mu'mineen and a cause of disgrace for the kuffar and munafiqeen ... When Imam Mehdi will reach the grave of Rasulullah, he will ask the people: "0 people! Is this the grave of our grandfather, Rasulullah?" The people will say - "Yes, this is his grave." Imam Mehdi will then ask:" "Who are these persons who have been buried alongside our grandfather!" The people will say: "They are Abu Bakr and Umar, the closest companions of Rasulullah I" Imam Mehdi (inspite of knowing everything) will say: "Who was Abu Bakr? And, who was Umar? What was their excellence which necessitated their burial alongside our grandfather?"... "After three days, Sahibul Amr (the Shi'i title for Imam Mehdi) will order the walls to be broken and their bodies exhumed .. After the exhumation of their bodies, he will order their kafan to be removed and their bodies will be hung up on a dried out tree... " Imam Mehdi will command a dark storm to destroy those who loved them (i.e. Abu Bakr and Umar). Imam Mehdi will then order that the bodies be taken down from the tree. With the power of Allah, Imam Mehdi will restore them to life. He will order all mankind to gather. Then these two will be held liable for the sin of all oppression and kufr which occurred from the beginning of the world. They will be held responsible for all such sin ..... The sin of every murder committed, of every act of adultery committed, of every act of riba, of every act of haram wealth and injustice perpetrated until the advent of Imam Mehdi's appearance, will be charged against them (Abu Bakr and, Umar). Both of them will plead guilty to all these crimes ... Sahibul Amr will then command that they be hanged on a tree. He will command a fire to rise from the earth and devour them. A fire will (miraculously) rise and reduce them (Abu Bakr and Umar) and the tree to ashes.. " "Muhammad Rasulullah, Ameerul Mumineen (i.e. Hadhrat Ali), Fatimah Zahra, Hasan Mujtaba, Husain Shaheed, and all the sinless Imaams will come to life. All Mumins and all kafirs will also come to life. " "... The two (Abu Bakr and Umar) will then be punished so much, that daily, in one day and one night, they will be killed and restored to life a thousand times. After this, Allah will take them away to wherever He desires and continue punishing them as long as He desires. " This, then are Khomeini's beliefs and attitude in regard to the two highest Companions of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). This is the official teaching of the Shiah religion. In his book Kashful Asrar on page 121, Khomeini advises his Shiah brethren to study the books of Mullah Baqir Majlisi who has presented these repugnant fabrications regarding the Sahaabah-e-Kiram (Radiallahu Anhum). SHI'ISM AND THE NOBLE MOTHERS OF THE UMMAH Allah Ta'ala says in the Qur'an: "The Nabi has a greater claim on the Believers than their ownselves. And, his wives are their mothers." Thus, an article of our Imaan is honor, respect and love for Umaahatul Mu'mineen, the holy Mothers of the Believers, Viz., the honorable wives of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Whoever denigrates them and brands them as unbelievers, is himself/herself a kafir. Among the honorable wives of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), Hadhrat Aishah (Radiallahu Anha) and Hadhrat Hafsah (Radiallahu Anha) are special targets for Shi'i abuse, slander and vilification. This is because they are the daughters of Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma) respectively. The same degree of hatred cherished by Shiahs for Shaikhain (i.e. Abu Bakr and Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma) is gorged out against Hadhrat Aishah and Hadhrat Hafsah (Radiallahu Anhuma). Shi'i narration's shamelessly describe these illustrious and noble wives of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) as kafir, Munafiq, etc. The worst of slanders and calumnies are leveled against them. Mullah Baqir Majlisi, in his book, Hayatul Quloob - one of the most authoritative books of the Shiah religion - repeatedly described Hadhrat Aishah and Hadhrat Hafsah (Radiallahu Anhuma) as munafiqs (hypocrites). In this book, Baqir also alleges: "Aishah and Hafsah martyred Rasulullah by giving him poison. (Vol. 2, Page 870) Accusing Shaikhain and their daughters of conspiracy to murder Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), the Shi'i, Baqir writes in Hayatul Quloob on page 745 of Vol. 2: "Thus these two male munafiqs (referring to Abu Bakr and Umar) and those two female munafiqs (referring to Aishah and Hafsah) agreed to martyr Rasulullah by administering poison to him. " Mutahhiri, a leading cleric of the Shiah religion, says: "Now that we see Ali, and Ammaar, Uways al-Qarani and others face to face with Aishah and az-Zubayr and Talhah, we do not feel any hesitation, for we see the second group as people with the look of criminals, that is, the effects of evil and treachery are evident on their faces: and when we look at their faces and their treacherous characters we guess that they are people of the Fire. " (TEHRAN TIMES, 25th August, 1982) From the above vile remarks made by one of Khomeini's leading Shi'i theologians, it will be evident that the Shiah religion describes Hadhrat Aishah Siddiqah (Radiallahu Anha) the beloved wife of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) as a criminal, evil, treacherous and among the people of Jahannum--Naauthubillaah! But, Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) warned: "Do not hurt me regarding Aishah." (Bukhari-Muslim) "The superiority of Aishah over women is like the superiority of thareed (a kind of food) over all food." (Muslim) "0 Aishah! Jibraeel recites Salaam upon you." (Muslim) In the Shiah religion, Hadhrat Zubair (Radiallahu Anhu) is described as a criminal, evil, treacherous and among the people of Jahannum-Nauthubillah! But, Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said about Zubair: "Every Nabi had a hawaari (helper) and my hawaari is Zubair." "Zubair will be in Jannat." (Tirmizi) Hadhrat Zubair and Hadhrat Talhah whom the Shiahs claim are among the "people of the Fire", are in fact members of the Ashrah Mubashsharah who are the ten Sahaabah unto whom Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) delivered the glad tidings of Jannat. These Sahabah already were informed by Nabi-e- Kareem (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) that their place in Jannat has already been secured, but Khomeini and his Shiahs believe that these noble men are among the people of the Fire. The Shiahs believe that Hadhrat Talhah (Radiallahu Anhu) is evil, treacherous, a criminal and among the people of the Fire, but Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: "Talhah and Zubair will be my two neighbors in Jannat." (Tirmizi) The Qur'an Shareef speaks glowingly regarding the Sahabah. In one place, the Qur'an praises the Sahabah in the following terms: But, Shi'ism preaches that all these Muhajireen and Ansar among the Sahabah, in fact all the Sahabah with the exception of three, reneged from Islam, i.e. they became murtads and kafirs after the demise of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Thus, the "Asah-hul Kutub" The Most Authentic "of Books" of the Shiah religion, Al-Jamiul Kafi, states in its chapter, Kitabur Raudhah on page 115: "After (the demise of) Nabi-(sallallahu alayhi wasallam) - all the people (i.e. the Sahabah) became murtads, excepting three. - Miqdad Bin Aswad, Abu Zar Ghifari and Salman Farsi, the Rahmat and Barkat of Allah be on them." KHOMEINI'S VIEW OF THE SAHABAH In his book, Kashful Asrar, on page 115 Khomeini accuses Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma) of having opposed the clear texts of the Qur'an. Thus he says: "We shall present a few examples of Abu Bakr and Umar having opposed the explicit laws of the Quran and deciding against it. The general body of the Muslims accept their decisions (which were in conflict with the Quran). " On page 119 of his book, Khomeini openly brands Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) as a kafir and zindeeq. Khomeini states: "From the examples of Abu Bakr's and Umar's opposition to the Qur'an, cited by us, it is clear that contradicting the Quran publicly and adopting actions in violation of the Quran were not regarded as a serious matter by these two. The Muslims of that time (viz. the Sahabah) either joined their (Abu Bakr's and Umar's) party in the quest for Political leadership which was their goal, or if they did not join their Party because of not fully supporting them, they never said a word in opposition to those unjust oppressors and powerful munafiqs (referring to Hadhrat's Abu Bakr and Umar). They lacked the courage for this... Abu Bakr who had plotted the whole conspiracy would have fabricated a hadith in contradiction to the Quran just as he had done for depriving Hadhrat Fatimah of her share of inheritance in the estate of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). And Umar - it is entirely to be expected that he would have said that either Allah Himself erred in revealing this ayat or Jibraeel or Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) erred in its delivery. At that time Sunnis would also have supported him and would have aided him in opposition to the command of Allah ... just as is their attitude in all these alterations which Umar effected in the Deen of Islam and its teachings. In all these (alterations of Umar) the Sunnis accorded priority to the statements of Umar in opposition to Qur'anic ayat and statements of the Rasool of Allah and that is exactly what they (Sunnis) are following. " These are the claims and allegations of Khomeini who vociferously and deceitfully, raises the slogan: "There is no Sunni'sm and no Shi'ism." In the above "tract from his book, Kashful Asrar, it is abundantly clear that Khomeini is echoing the following Shi'i beliefs: *That Hadhrat Abu Bakr, Umar and the entire body of the Sahabah were murtads and munafiqs. * That Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Umar interpolated in the Qur'an, changing and deleting to suit their whims and desires. They fabricated and forged ahadith in conflict with the Qur'an. The logical conclusion emanating from these Shiah beliefs is that the Qur'an which we have with us today is not authentic since it was the compilation of these very Sahabah who are regarded as munafiqs by Shi'ism. Besides this fact stemming as the logical conclusion from Shiah beliefs, the highest books of the Shiah religion categorically assert the falsity of the present Qur'an. Insha'Allah, this claim will be described later. Abu Hurairah (Radiallahu Anhu) is a famous name. This illustrious Sahaabi of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) is well-known for his copious narration of ahadith. Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) made special dua for Hadhrat Abu Hurairah (Radiallahu Anhu), but Khomeini has the following to say about this eminent Sahaabi and Muhaddith: "God knows what Misfortunes Islam has Suffered from its inception down to the present at the hands of these evil 'ulama'. Abu Hurairah was one of the fuqaha, but Allah knows what judgments he falsified for Muaawiya and others like him, and what damage he inflicted upon Islam - But when a faqih like Abu Hurairah or a judge like Shurayh joins such a government, he improves its standing while besmirching the reputation of Islam." Commenting on this statement of Khomeini, Hamid Algar the compiler of Khomeini's writings and declarations, states: "Shi'i scholars have regarded him as unreliable and even dishonest." But, Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) made special dua for Abu Hurairah in respect of narration of ahadith, hence we observe the ahadith in abundance narrated by him. The following statement bears out the love which Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had for Hadhrat Abu Hurairah (Radiallahu Anhu). "O Allah! Endear this, your servant (Abu Hurairah) and his mother to your believing servants and endear the believers to them." (Muslim) Thus those who are Believers love Abu Hurairah (Radiallahu Anhu). Those who are unbelievers detest Hadhrat Abu Hurairah (Radiallahu Anhu). Khomeini, slandering the eminent Sahaabi, Hadhrat Samura Bin Jundub (Radiallahu Anhu) says: "Dissemination of the ordinances of Islam, as well as the teaching and instruction of the people, is the duty of the fuqaha who are just. For if they are not just, they will be like those who forged traditions harmful to Islam, like Samura ibn Jandab, who forged traditions hostile to the Commander of the Faithful." SHI'I LIES, SLANDER AND ABUSE Nahjul Balaaghah, one of the highest books of Shiah theology has the following abuse and vituperation for the Khulafa-e-Raashideen and the illustrious Sahaabah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam); this scurrilous attack and abuse is ascribed by the Shiahs to Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu).: "At last the first Caliph died, but while going, he appointed another to fill his vacancy. It is not astonishing that during his lifetime he was always badly in need of the help Of Others to compensate for his imperfections and defects and to cover his faults and failures, but at the time of his death he thought himself to be wise and learned enough to fix and appoint somebody to carry on the duties at which he was a complete failure himself." "Boldly and unscrupulously he and his successor (a reference to Hadhrat Umar), each in turn, pillaged and plundered the wealth of the community leaving the state in such sadly injured condition that the passage of time was increasing the intensity of the injury ... But it was carried on under the guise of law and order and many unacceptable excuses were offered to justify these irreligious and ungodly arrogation's and many more will be repeated in the future." "Consequently the third (i.e. Hadhrat Uthmaan) proudly took charge of the caliphate, as if it was a private grazing ground, and with bloated stomachs he and members of his clan (Bani Umayya) started plundering the wealth of the Muslim world in the same reckless gluttonous manner which characterizes a camel when it devours harvest grass. However, this man met an untimely death. The greed of his clan was the cause of his undoing. " (Nahjul Balaaghah) Another lie which the Shiahs attribute to Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) is the following statement: "You know very well that Amr-ibn-Aas himself is an inveterate liar, he usually lies, he makes promises without intention of fulfilling them ... He habitually breaks his pledges, never keeps a promise and is unkind and unmerciful In the battlefield before the swords are drawn and fight begins, he is usually very bold in giving orders and very conspicuous in pretension of leading the army; but when the fight actually begins, his greatest tactic is to show his opponents his naked buttocks. " (Nahjul Balaaghah) Ameerul Mu'mineen Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) never uttered such falsehood, slander, abuse, insult and vulgarity. Such abuse and vituperation are the stock weapons of Shi'ism. Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) had the utmost respect and honor for Hadhrat Abu Bakr, Hadhrat Umar and Hadhrat Uthmaan (Radiallahu Anhum). In fact, Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) took the oath of allegiance (ba'yt) on the hands of the first three Khulafa Raashideen. Furthermore, Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) could never have spoken so disparagingly of the great Conqueror of Islam, viz., Hadhrat Amr Ibn Aas (Radiallahu Anhu) who was among the top-ranking Companions of Nabi-e- Kareern (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). No Mu'min and no person of any Imaani intelligence can ever accept that Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) was capable of uttering such profanity as the Shiah ascribe to him. Moreover, the absurdity of attributing this torrent of abuse to Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) becomes more glaring by the fact that Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) gave his eldest daughter, Umme Kulthoom (Radiallahu Anha) in marriage to Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu). Umme Kulthum (Radiallahu Anha) was the eldest daughter of Hadhrat Fatimah (Radiallahu Anha). This act of Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) completely confuses the Shiahs and entirely repudiates the Shiah doctrine of hatred for the Sahabah in general and for Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) in particular. Shiah priests are at pains and to this day remain in the grip of mental labor pains attempting to explain away and misinterpret this act of Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu). Shiahs, unanimously regard Hadhrat Ali as the first and highest of their Imaams. Some regard him even as God. The main branch of Shi'ism, viz. the Ithna Ashris to which Khomeini belongs, claims Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) to be on the same rank as Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) as well as being higher than even other Ambiya A.S. Thus, Khomeini states: "It is one of the essential beliefs of our Shi'i school that no one can attain the spiritual status of the lmaam, not even the cherubim or the prophets. " (Writings and Declarations of Khomeini) The Shiah book, Usool-e-Kafi states: "The laws brought by Ali ... His rank is like the rank of Muhammad." This being the Shi'i belief regarding Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu), they have been thrown into total disarray and confusion by the marriage of Hadhrat Ali's daughter to Hadhrat Umar. In struggling to explain away this indictment against Shi'ism, the Shiah priests resort to a variety of Taqiyah Tricks. But, far from satisfactorily explaining this truth, they only succeed in compounding their confusion and exhibiting their mental absurdity. How was it possible for Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) to have consented to his daughter marrying Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) whom Shi'ism unanimously brands as a munafiq, kafir, murtad, murderer, oppressor and a multitude of other vile epithets? Indeed, this holy marriage is perpetually dangling on the necks of the Shiah priests like a dead albatross which they are unable to shed off - with which they have to live and be haunted. Among the most ludicrous explanations fabricated by the Shiahs to argue away this historical fact, Rawindi the ' Qutubul Aqtab' of the Shiahs claims that when Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) pressurized and threatened Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) to consent to this marriage with Umme Kulthum, he (Ali) miraculously transformed a female Jinn into the form, and appearance of Kulthum. Thus, Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) married this female Jinn while the real Umme Kulthum remained in concealment. Only plunderers of Imaan could fabricate such nonsensical absurdity. This alleged miraculous transformation of the female Jinn is described in detail in the Shiah book, Mawaiz-e-Husainiyah. Regarding this marriage, Abu Ja'far Yaqub Kaleeni, claims in his book Furoo'Kafi (an authoritative book of the Shiahs) that Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) did not marry Umme Kulthum, but abducted her by force. According to these miserable Shiah slanderers, Hadhrat Umar captured her by force and fornicated with her (Nauthubillah!) and kept her in captivity against her wishes and without having performed nikah with her. Thus, then, is the reasoning of minds impregnated with kufr. The Shiah mujtahid, Muhammad Hussain Dakkoo states in his book, Tajalliat- e-Sadaqat: "While the Sunnis consider them Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthman) to be the noblest after Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) we (Shiahs) firmly believe that they were bereft of the wealth of Imaan and Ikhlas. (Page 201) "..... the three Khalifs (Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthman) in his (Ali's) estimation were sinners, liars, treacherous, cheats, oppressors and usurpers... " (Page 206) "The conquests during the reign of the first three Khalifs sullied the "The conquests during the reign of the first three Khalifs sullied the name of Islam." (Page 95) "We do not deny the first part of the Sunni claim that Aishah (Radiallahu Anha) being the wife of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) is the mother of the Muslims. But we do not hold the view that she was a believer. To be a mother is one thing and to be a Mu'minah (Believer) is another thing. " (Page 478) Every Muslim knows that Hadhrat Khalid Bin Walid (Radiallahu Anhu) has been given the title, Saifullah (the Sword of Allah) by Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). But, the Shiah priests offer the following vituperation: "Tyrant Khalid beheaded Malik and two leaders of his tribe. Their heads were put in the oven in which food was cooked for the feast of Walimah. In this way, the Walimah of zina (adultery) was prepared and Khalid himself ate therefrom and served it to his soldiers as well. " (Page 100, the Shiah book by Hussain Buksh Jara, Munazarah Baghdad). The Shiah priest Ghulam Husain Najfi wrote in his book, Fi Jawab: Nikah Umme Kulthoom: "Umar did not believe in the Quran. (Page 429) "Umar continued to consume liquor even after it was declared unlawful. The last thing which he consumed before his death was liquor." (Page430) "Umar is the lock of Jahannum." (Page 430) Those are just a few statements cited from the book of this immoral and bestial Shi'i unbeliever. There are many other statements of extreme filth which these Shi'i hoodlum priests gorge out against Hadhrat Umar and Uthman (Radiallahu Anhu). But we feel too ashamed to record and too difficult to write the filthy words of vulgarity and immorality which the priests of Shi'ism so shamelessly and mercilessly direct against the most illustrious Sahabah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). The filthiest charges of moral debasement are hurled at Ameerul Mu'mineen Hadhrat Uthman about whom Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) spoke so glowingly. His modesty and shame were of such a lofty degree that, according to Rasulullah ( sallallahu alayhi wasallam), even the Malaikah felt shy for him. It is only Shi'i renegades and unbelievers who possess sufficient audacity and shamelessness to besmirch such a paragon of virtue and modesty with the vilest charges of immorality and moral debasement. May Allah Ta'ala eliminate these vile priests of blasphemy, slander, scandal and kufr. [1 Aktualisierung]
• Search Facebook kufr: Meri Mohabbat Ki Haqeeqat Tum Kiya Jaano,Sir Jhukaya To TujheManga,Haath Uthaya To TujheMaanga…ayat_baloch.... [1 Aktualisierung]

 Quran & Sunnahs Facebook-Pinnwand: 57. Wir doch haben euch erschaffen; wenn ihr (es) doch für wahr halten würdet!...

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 05:24PM +0100  

Quran & Sunnahs Facebook-Pinnwand
 
Quran & Sunnahs Facebook-Pinnwand
 
57. Wir doch haben euch erschaffen; wenn ihr (es) doch für wahr halten würdet!...
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=493175254091362&set=a.154231584652399.39769.142286859180205&type=1
Jul 1st 2013, 15:23
 
57. Wir doch haben euch erschaffen; wenn ihr (es) doch für wahr halten würdet!

58. Was meint ihr denn zu dem, was ihr als Samen ausspritzt?

59. Seid ihr es etwa, die ihn erschaffen oder sind nicht doch Wir die Erschaffer?

60. Wir doch haben unter euch den Tod festgelegt. Und niemand kann Uns zuvorkommen,

61. daß Wir (nicht) euresgleichen (gegen euch) austauschen und euch (in einem Zustand wieder)entstehen lassen, den ihr nicht kennt.

62. Und ihr kennt doch die erste Schöpfung. Wenn ihr doch bedenken würdet!

63. Was meint ihr denn zu dem, was ihr an Saatfeldern bestellt?

64. Seid ihr es etwa, die es wachsen lassen, oder sind nicht doch Wir es, die wachsen lassen?

65. Wenn Wir wollten, könnten Wir es wahrlich zu zermalmtem Zeug machen, und ihr würdet dann dauernd verwundert darüber reden:

66. „Wir sind wahrlich mit Schulden belastet.

67. Nein! Vielmehr ist uns alles verwehrt worden."

68. Was meint ihr denn zu dem Wasser, das ihr trinkt?

69. Seid ihr es etwa, die es von den Wolken herabkommen lassen, oder sind doch nicht Wir es, die herabkommen lassen?

70. Wenn Wir wollten, könnten Wir es (auf der Zunge) brennend machen. Wenn ihr doch dankbar sein würdet!

71. Was meint ihr denn zu dem Feuer, das ihr (durch Reiben) zündet?

72. Seid ihr es etwa, die den dazu nötigen Baum entstehen lassen, oder sind nicht doch Wir es, die entstehen lassen?

73. Wir haben es ja zur Erinnerung (an das Höllenfeuer) und als Nießbrauch für die Wanderer gemacht.

74. Darum preise den Namen deines Allgewaltigen Herrn.

(Quran 56. Sure al Waqia - Vers 57 - 74)

(Admin 1)
 
 
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/9syjPx


 

 Bereit dir die Welt zu Füßen zulegen.s Facebook-Pinnwand: Fang jetzt an zu beten und sage nicht "Ich fange morgen an" - vielleicht wirst d...

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 05:25PM +0100  

Bereit dir die Welt zu Füßen zulegen.s Facebook-Pinnwand
 
Bereit dir die Welt zu Füßen zulegen.s Facebook-Pinnwand
 
Fang jetzt an zu beten und sage nicht "Ich fange morgen an" - vielleicht wirst d...
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=504098732995702&set=a.299555113450066.71210.241295589276019&type=1
Jul 1st 2013, 16:03
 
Fang jetzt an zu beten und sage nicht "Ich fange morgen an" - vielleicht wirst du morgen nicht mehr aufwachen !

Liebe Geschwister, das erste wonach euch Allāh swt. fragen wird, ist ob ihr gebetet habt !



- Marah
 
 
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/w4ZDfS


 

 Bereit dir die Welt zu Füßen zulegen.s Facebook-Pinnwand: Früher hieß es, er praktiziert und ist ein ehrenhafter Mann; nimm ihn !Heute f...

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 05:25PM +0100  

Bereit dir die Welt zu Füßen zulegen.s Facebook-Pinnwand
 
Bereit dir die Welt zu Füßen zulegen.s Facebook-Pinnwand
 
Früher hieß es, er praktiziert und ist ein ehrenhafter Mann; nimm ihn !
 
Heute f...
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=504100289662213&set=a.299555113450066.71210.241295589276019&type=1
Jul 1st 2013, 15:27
 
Früher hieß es, er praktiziert und ist ein ehrenhafter Mann; nimm ihn !

Heute fragt man nach dem Mercedes Schlüssel...



- Marah
 
 
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/w4ZDfS


 

 DİE İDEALE MUSLİMAs Facebook-Pinnwand: VERMEIDE STREIT UND DISKUSSIONEN,,Ich versichere und verspreche ein Haus im Pa...

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 05:24PM +0100  

DİE İDEALE MUSLİMAs Facebook-Pinnwand
 
DİE İDEALE MUSLİMAs Facebook-Pinnwand
 
VERMEIDE STREIT UND DISKUSSIONEN
 
,,Ich versichere und verspreche ein Haus im Pa...
http://www.facebook.com/DieIdealeMusLima/posts/551368681588169
Jul 1st 2013, 15:46
 
VERMEIDE STREIT UND DISKUSSIONEN

,,Ich versichere und verspreche ein Haus im Paradies für denjenigen, der auf Streitigkeiten/Diskussionen verzichtet, selbst wenn er im Recht ist.''

(Dieser Ḥadīth wurde bei Abū Dāwūd 4800 und al-Bayhaqī 10/249 berichtet und von al-Albānī als ḥasan eingestuft in Ṣaḥīḥ al-Targhīb 6/3.)

أنا زعيم بيت في رَبَضِ الجنة لمن ترك المراء وإن كان مُحِقَّا، وبيت في وسط الجنة لمن ترك الكذب وإن كان مازحًا، وبيت في أعلى الجنة لمن حَسُن خلقه
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/bBY5XT


 

 DİE İDEALE MUSLİMAs Facebook-Pinnwand: Salam alaykumHat jemand vielleicht noch von den alten khimar sets? Die mit den...

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 05:24PM +0100  

DİE İDEALE MUSLİMAs Facebook-Pinnwand
 
DİE İDEALE MUSLİMAs Facebook-Pinnwand
 
Salam alaykum
Hat jemand vielleicht noch von den alten khimar sets? Die mit den...
http://www.facebook.com/DieIdealeMusLima/posts/551378698253834
Jul 1st 2013, 16:20
 
Salam alaykum
Hat jemand vielleicht noch von den alten khimar sets? Die mit den knöpfen an den ärmeln... Ohne gummi... İn schwarz... ? Barak Allahu feekum...
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/bBY5XT


 

 Islam - Die wahre Religions Facebook-Pinnwand:

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 05:23PM +0100  

Islam - Die wahre Religions Facebook-Pinnwand
 
Islam - Die wahre Religions Facebook-Pinnwand
 
 
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=583885444995578&set=a.326808834036575.89242.312453292138796&type=1
Jul 1st 2013, 15:56
 
 
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/yD6Ps1


 

 Islam & Liebe - für die Ewigkeits Facebook-Pinnwand: Salamu alaikum, ausser auf seiten poste ich auch in meiner kronik islamische bil...

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 05:23PM +0100  

Islam & Liebe - für die Ewigkeits Facebook-Pinnwand
 
Islam & Liebe - für die Ewigkeits Facebook-Pinnwand
 
Salamu alaikum, ausser auf seiten poste ich auch in meiner kronik islamische bil...
http://www.facebook.com/IslamLiebeFurDieEwigkeit/posts/337141456417563
Jul 1st 2013, 16:22
 
Salamu alaikum, ausser auf seiten poste ich auch in meiner kronik islamische bilder und sprüche..
Wer Interesse hat, Können Die muslims Mich anfragen und die muslimas mich abonnieren.
Hier mein link:

https://www.facebook.com/Muhammed.cinar.142
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/D3vvks


 

 Die wahre Geschichte der Türkeis Facebook-Pinnwand: -Der Aufstand der armenischen Terroristen in Erzurum im Jahre 1890-Dieser Aufs...

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 05:23PM +0100  

Die wahre Geschichte der Türkeis Facebook-Pinnwand
 
Die wahre Geschichte der Türkeis Facebook-Pinnwand
 
-Der Aufstand der armenischen Terroristen in Erzurum im Jahre 1890-
 
Dieser Aufs...
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=604530272914763&set=a.478563782178080.111858.478508968850228&type=1
Jul 1st 2013, 15:35
 
-Der Aufstand der armenischen Terroristen in Erzurum im Jahre 1890-

Dieser Aufstand in der Stadt Erzurum fand am 20. Juni 1890 statt. Die Armenier hatten damal Waffen und Equipment von den Russen erhalten und sie in ihren Kirchen und Schulen versteckt. Woraufhin der Governeur von Erzurum Sâmih Paşa davon benachrichtigt wurde. Daraufhin plante die Polizei an diesen Orten eine Razzia, um dies zu überprüfen. Aber die Armenier haben dies mitbekommen und sich dementsprechend vorbereitet. Die armenischen Terroristen haben das Feuer auf die Polizisten und Soldaten eröffnet, die zum Tatort kamen. Ein Soldat, ein Kommandant und ein Polizist wurden getötet.
Ein Armenier Namens Gergesyan hatte eine terroristische Einheit Namens "Müdâfi Vatandaşlar" gegründet und dieser Mann Gergesyan hat wenig später noch ein paar Polizisten getötet.
Daraufhin gab es eine ca. 2-stündige Auseinandersetzung zwischen der osmanischen Polizei und den Terroristen. Nach diesem Gefecht wurden hunderte Soldaten der Osmanen getötet.
Die Absicht hinter diesem Aufstand war es, eine angebliche Unterdrückung der Armenier vorzutäuschen, um die europäischen Staaten hier einzuschalten.

[Veysel Eroğlu - Ermeni Mezâlimi; Seiten 68-69]
 
 
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/hWcH36


 

 Türken auf der ganzen Welt *-*s Facebook-Pinnwand: Schöne Frauennamen änden mit A :D#Rabia

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 05:21PM +0100  

Türken auf der ganzen Welt *-*s Facebook-Pinnwand
 
Türken auf der ganzen Welt *-*s Facebook-Pinnwand
 
Schöne Frauennamen änden mit A :D
 
#Rabia
http://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=331850410278814&id=197272227069967
Jul 1st 2013, 16:16
 
Schöne Frauennamen änden mit A :D

#Rabia
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/zr5WX3


 

 Die wahre Religions Facebook-Pinnwand: Lies! Infostand in Bremerhaven am 29.06.2013

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 05:21PM +0100  

Die wahre Religions Facebook-Pinnwand
 
Die wahre Religions Facebook-Pinnwand
 
Lies! Infostand in Bremerhaven am 29.06.2013
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=573678762683597
Jul 1st 2013, 15:25
 
Lies! Infostand in Bremerhaven am 29.06.2013
 
 
1. Juli 2013 08:25
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/w5nJgc


 

 Anti Bashar al Assad 2013s Facebook-Pinnwand: Mal ehrlich. Wie kann man von "Menschen" Gnade und Erbarmen für unsere Frauen un...

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 05:20PM +0100  

Anti Bashar al Assad 2013s Facebook-Pinnwand
 
Anti Bashar al Assad 2013s Facebook-Pinnwand
 
Mal ehrlich. Wie kann man von "Menschen" Gnade und Erbarmen für unsere Frauen un...
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=577490008967999&set=a.527050214011979.1073741828.525363237514010&type=1
Jul 1st 2013, 15:50
 
Mal ehrlich. Wie kann man von "Menschen" Gnade und Erbarmen für unsere Frauen und Kinder verlangen, die nicht mal vor ihren EIGENEN Kinder Gnade kennen??
Ihr Kindermörder ihr !!!
 
 
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/V79lhZ


 

 Confirm your unsubscription from 'Search Facebook salafist'

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 05:06PM +0100  

To confirm that you no longer wish to receive updates from 'Search Facebook salafist', please click on the following link:
 
https://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/confirm/3PtkSZ/2jT1dr
 
 
If you weren't expecting to receive this email, then simply ignore it and we'll go away.


 

 Search Facebook Schirk: Es ist von Aslu din (Grundlage des islam ) jemanden als muschrik kafir in darul kufr anzusehen bis das gegenteil kommt bis man seine 100% Akida Tauhid festgestellt hatt das er Muslim istAl-Imam Ibnu Qudamah al-Maqdisi sagte: „Denn die Grundlage ist: wer in einem Dar ist, dergehört zu seinen Leuten. Ihr Hukm wird auf ihn angewendet, solange kein Beweis für dasGegenteil gekommen ist." [al-Mughni (5/24)]Ibnu Nujaym sagt:"Die Grundlage ist; dass der jenige, der (alleine) betet, der fastet, der eine unvollkommene Hajj macht, Sadaqa gibtund Gottesdientliche Handlungen macht die auch die jenigen machen die einer anderen Religion angehören, nichtden Hukm des Islaams bekommt. Und auch kann man mit den (Handlungen) wie der Tayammum welcher speziellvon unserer Shari'ah ist -aber nicht von den grundlegenden Gottesdiensten ist- nicht mit dem Islaam urteilen."(al-Mawsuatu-l Quwaytiyya, 1/1380)Imaamnu-n Nawawiyy sagt:"Der Kaafir (aslii) wird nicht als Muslim angesehen (auch wenn) er das Gebet führt (Imaam ist), dem Imaam (imGebet) folgt, alleine, in der Masjid oder wo anders betet, egal wie. Und hierbei ist nicht zu beachten ob er sich imDaaru-l Islaam oder Daaru-l Harb befindet. Das ist die Aussage die von Imaamu-sh Shafi'iyy in "Kitaabu-l Umm"steht."(Sharhu-l Muhadhdhab, 4/252)Al-Imam Ibnu Hazm al-Andalusi sagte: „Das Dar wird auf demjenigen bezogen, der darüber herrscht, darin regiert und es besitzt." [al-Muhalla (11/200)]Shaykh 'Abdul-Hakam al-Qahtani sagte: „Und wir sind überzeugt, dass die scheinbaren Zeichen/Anzeichen/Merkmale des Islam heutzutage nicht herangezogen werden – wie das Salah [=Gebet] und Siyam [=Fasten] und dergleichen, oder wenn jemand sagt, dass er Iman an Allah, Seine Engel, Seine Bücher, die Propheten und den letzten Tag hat, oder derjenige der behauptet auf dem Din des Islam zu sein, so wird er nicht als Muslim (wegen diesem angesehen), bis seine Lossagung vom Schirk und seinen Angehörigen bewiesen ist. Von dieser Angelegenheit ist folgendes:Erstens: Dass die Bedingung für die Annahme der Aussagen und Handlungen einer Person um in den Islam einzutreten, der Punkt der Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk und seinen Angehörigen ist und dies ist das Zeichen, welches aufzeigt, dass er dem Islam folgt, und dieses wird herangezogen um von den Angehörigen des Schirk zu unterscheiden.Auch wenn es ein Zeichen gibt, welches die Angehörigen des Islam und die Angehörigen des Schirk gemeinsam aufweisen (wie das Gebet in der heutigen Zeit), dann darf niemand jemanden auf dieser Basis als Muslim beurteilen – ganz zu schweigen, dass der Verstand ein Beweis für das Gegenteil (dieser Behauptung) ist. Denn die Aussprache von La ilaha illa Allah machte die Muschrikin von Mekka, zu Leuten welche es Sabian sagten [=jemand der den Din seines Volkes verlässt, um in einen anderen Din einzutreten; also hier vom Schirk in den Tawhid] und loyal zum Din von Muhammad, sallallahu 'alaihi wa salam, waren.Also die Aussprache davon (von La ilaha illa Allah) war in dieser Zeit ein Beweis für die Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk und seinen Angehörigen. Doch heutzutage sagen es alle, welche behaupten den Din des Islam zu folgen und sicherlich weisen sie einige oder viele islamische Anzeichen auf. Auch die Herrscher, deren Helfer und ihre Soldaten machen dies (also La ilaha illa Allah sagen etc...). Selbst andere von den Milal [=Religionen] des Schirk machen dieses oder jenes (von den scheinbaren islamischen Anzeichen), wie die Grabanbeter, die Rawafid und dergleichen, welche weit entfernt sind vom Din (des Islam). Aus diesem Grund wird im Din bestimmt, dass der Islam nicht bewiesen wird nur durch die bloße Zuschreibung und Behauptung (zu diesem), sondern die Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk und seinen Angehörigen muss vor dem Urteil des Islam (über eine Person) festgestellt werden.Zweitens: Die Einwohner von Mekka und jene um sie herum, waren auf dem Din von Ibrahim und Ismaʿil. Dann kam Amr ibnu Luhay al-Khuza'iy und schmückte den Schirk für die Menschen aus, und befahl ihnen die Statuen (Götzen) anzubeten. Somit verbreitete sich der Schirk und wurde vorherrschend in den Städten. Als dann der Prophet, sallallahu 'alaihi wa salam, entsandt wurde, beurteilte er sie (also die Menschen, welche behaupteten auf dem Din von Ibrahim zu sein) mit dem Schirk: {Sprich: „Oh ihr Kafirun!"} [109:1] Und er musste nicht berücksichtigen auf was sie sind, von den Überresten der Religion von Ibrahim, um über sie mit dem (Schirk) zu urteilen. Demzufolge urteilte er über sie nicht mit dem Islam, trotz (der Tatsache), dass sie Rituale wie die Hajj, 'Umrah, Tawaf al-Bayt, Sadaqah, Siyam, Ta'dhim al-Bayt al-Haram durchführten und an die Rububiyyah von Allah glaubten, dass Er der Schöpfer und Versorger ist. Noch beurteilte er sie auf dem Islam, weil sie behaupteten auf der Millah [=Gemeinschaft] von Ibrahim zu sein, noch wegen ihrer Prahlerei zu dieser, solange sie sich nicht frei vom Schirk und seinen Angehörigen waren.Also auf die gleiche Weise wie der Prophet, sallallahu 'alaihi wa salam, es nicht als Beweis berücksichtigte für deren Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk und deren Verankerung im (wahren) Din von Ibrahim, welche Rituale sie (auch immer) durchführten und was sie vom Din von Ibrahim geerbt hatten, so sind auch die Rituale heutzutage (wie das Gebet etc.), welche von jenen praktiziert werden, die sich selber dem Islam zuschreiben, kein Beweis für deren Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk, und dass sie auf dem Din von Muhammad, sallallahu 'alaihi wa salam, sind. Drittens: Der Konsens der Sahabah bezüglich ihres Takfir auf die Banu Hanifah von den Anhängern von Musaylamah [=dem falschen Propheten zur Zeit des Propheten Muhammad, sallallahu 'alaihi wa salam] und anderen, wie es bekannt ist, trotz der Tatsache, dass die meisten vom „normalen" Volk waren und die Unwissenden jeden Schrei/Aufruf folgen, und beteten, fasteten und La ilaha illa Allah sagten. Aber all dass verhinderte nicht, dass sie mit Kufr, Schirk und Riddah gegenüber dem Din von Allah beurteilt wurden. Und die Sahabah behandelten alle auf die selbe Art, und urteilten mit dem selben Urteil, und sie trennten und unterschieden nicht zwischen deren Gruppen und deren einzelnen Personen, noch zwischen ihren Großen und Kleinen, noch zwischen deren Gelehrten und den Unwissenden, oder zwischen dem der folgt und dem welchem gefolgt wird. Und sie akzeptierten die Taubah [=Reue] nicht von jemanden, außer er lehnte Musaylamah und seinen Din ab und sagte sich vom Schirk und seinen Angehörigen los. Viertens: Desweiteren gibt es im Buch und der Sunnah keinen einzigen Punkt, welcher darauf hin deutet, dass die erwähnten Zeichen (wie das Gebet usw...) als Beweis für den Islam in jeder Situation herangezogen werden müssen. Die Beweise in der Schariʿah weisen vielmehr darauf hin, dass die Zeichen nur dann berücksichtigt werden, wenn sie ein Beweis für die Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk und seinen Angehörigen sind, und wenn nicht, dann nicht. Weil es von den Kuffar und Muschrikun welche gibt, für die (die Bezeugung von) La ilaha illa Allah ausreichend ist (um in den Islam einzutreten), und es gibt welche, für die es nicht ausreichend ist, außer sie bezeugen dass al-Masih (also ʿIsa, 'alaihi salam) Sein Diener und Sein Gesandter ist, wie bei den Nasara (wenn sie in den Islam eintreten wollen), und es gibt weitere, wo dies nicht ausreicht, außer sie führen die Handlungen des Islam aus, wie der Murtad, welcher das verlassen muss, was der Grund für seine Riddah war (wie das Unterlassen des Gebets etc.) und Taubah macht von dieser und so weiter." [Hadha Dinuna, Seite 13-15]

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 04:51PM +0100  

Search Facebook Schirk
 
Search Facebook Schirk
 
Es ist von Aslu din (Grundlage des islam ) jemanden als muschrik kafir in darul kufr anzusehen bis das gegenteil kommt bis man seine 100% Akida Tauhid festgestellt hatt das er Muslim ist
 
Al-Imam Ibnu Qudamah al-Maqdisi sagte: „Denn die Grundlage ist: wer in einem Dar ist, der
gehört zu seinen Leuten. Ihr Hukm wird auf ihn angewendet, solange kein Beweis für das
Gegenteil gekommen ist." [al-Mughni (5/24)]
 
Ibnu Nujaym sagt:
"Die Grundlage ist; dass der jenige, der (alleine) betet, der fastet, der eine unvollkommene Hajj macht, Sadaqa gibt
und Gottesdientliche Handlungen macht die auch die jenigen machen die einer anderen Religion angehören, nicht
den Hukm des Islaams bekommt. Und auch kann man mit den (Handlungen) wie der Tayammum welcher speziell
von unserer Shari'ah ist -aber nicht von den grundlegenden Gottesdiensten ist- nicht mit dem Islaam urteilen."
(al-Mawsuatu-l Quwaytiyya, 1/1380)
 
Imaamnu-n Nawawiyy sagt:
"Der Kaafir (aslii) wird nicht als Muslim angesehen (auch wenn) er das Gebet führt (Imaam ist), dem Imaam (im
Gebet) folgt, alleine, in der Masjid oder wo anders betet, egal wie. Und hierbei ist nicht zu beachten ob er sich im
Daaru-l Islaam oder Daaru-l Harb befindet. Das ist die Aussage die von Imaamu-sh Shafi'iyy in "Kitaabu-l Umm"
steht."
(Sharhu-l Muhadhdhab, 4/252)
 
Al-Imam Ibnu Hazm al-Andalusi sagte: „Das Dar wird auf demjenigen bezogen, der darüber herrscht, darin regiert und es besitzt." [al-Muhalla (11/200)]
 
Shaykh 'Abdul-Hakam al-Qahtani sagte: „Und wir sind überzeugt, dass die scheinbaren Zeichen/Anzeichen/Merkmale des Islam heutzutage nicht herangezogen werden – wie das Salah [=Gebet] und Siyam [=Fasten] und dergleichen, oder wenn jemand sagt, dass er Iman an Allah, Seine Engel, Seine Bücher, die Propheten und den letzten Tag hat, oder derjenige der behauptet auf dem Din des Islam zu sein, so wird er nicht als Muslim (wegen diesem angesehen), bis seine Lossagung vom Schirk und seinen Angehörigen bewiesen ist. Von dieser Angelegenheit ist folgendes:
 
Erstens: Dass die Bedingung für die Annahme der Aussagen und Handlungen einer Person um in den Islam einzutreten, der Punkt der Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk und seinen Angehörigen ist und dies ist das Zeichen, welches aufzeigt, dass er dem Islam folgt, und dieses wird herangezogen um von den Angehörigen des Schirk zu unterscheiden.
 
Auch wenn es ein Zeichen gibt, welches die Angehörigen des Islam und die Angehörigen des Schirk gemeinsam aufweisen (wie das Gebet in der heutigen Zeit), dann darf niemand jemanden auf dieser Basis als Muslim beurteilen – ganz zu schweigen, dass der Verstand ein Beweis für das Gegenteil (dieser Behauptung) ist. Denn die Aussprache von La ilaha illa Allah machte die Muschrikin von Mekka, zu Leuten welche es Sabian sagten [=jemand der den Din seines Volkes verlässt, um in einen anderen Din einzutreten; also hier vom Schirk in den Tawhid] und loyal zum Din von Muhammad, sallallahu 'alaihi wa salam, waren.
 
Also die Aussprache davon (von La ilaha illa Allah) war in dieser Zeit ein Beweis für die Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk und seinen Angehörigen. Doch heutzutage sagen es alle, welche behaupten den Din des Islam zu folgen und sicherlich weisen sie einige oder viele islamische Anzeichen auf. Auch die Herrscher, deren Helfer und ihre Soldaten machen dies (also La ilaha illa Allah sagen etc...). Selbst andere von den Milal [=Religionen] des Schirk machen dieses oder jenes (von den scheinbaren islamischen Anzeichen), wie die Grabanbeter, die Rawafid und dergleichen, welche weit entfernt sind vom Din (des Islam). Aus diesem Grund wird im Din bestimmt, dass der Islam nicht bewiesen wird nur durch die bloße Zuschreibung und Behauptung (zu diesem), sondern die Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk und seinen Angehörigen muss vor dem Urteil des Islam (über eine Person) festgestellt werden.
 
Zweitens: Die Einwohner von Mekka und jene um sie herum, waren auf dem Din von Ibrahim und Ismaʿil. Dann kam Amr ibnu Luhay al-Khuza'iy und schmückte den Schirk für die Menschen aus, und befahl ihnen die Statuen (Götzen) anzubeten. Somit verbreitete sich der Schirk und wurde vorherrschend in den Städten. Als dann der Prophet, sallallahu 'alaihi wa salam, entsandt wurde, beurteilte er sie (also die Menschen, welche behaupteten auf dem Din von Ibrahim zu sein) mit dem Schirk: {Sprich: „Oh ihr Kafirun!"} [109:1] Und er musste nicht berücksichtigen auf was sie sind, von den Überresten der Religion von Ibrahim, um über sie mit dem (Schirk) zu urteilen. Demzufolge urteilte er über sie nicht mit dem Islam, trotz (der Tatsache), dass sie Rituale wie die Hajj, 'Umrah, Tawaf al-Bayt, Sadaqah, Siyam, Ta'dhim al-Bayt al-Haram durchführten und an die Rububiyyah von Allah glaubten, dass Er der Schöpfer und Versorger ist. Noch beurteilte er sie auf dem Islam, weil sie behaupteten auf der Millah [=Gemeinschaft] von Ibrahim zu sein, noch wegen ihrer Prahlerei zu dieser, solange sie sich nicht frei vom Schirk und seinen Angehörigen waren.
 
Also auf die gleiche Weise wie der Prophet, sallallahu 'alaihi wa salam, es nicht als Beweis berücksichtigte für deren Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk und deren Verankerung im (wahren) Din von Ibrahim, welche Rituale sie (auch immer) durchführten und was sie vom Din von Ibrahim geerbt hatten, so sind auch die Rituale heutzutage (wie das Gebet etc.), welche von jenen praktiziert werden, die sich selber dem Islam zuschreiben, kein Beweis für deren Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk, und dass sie auf dem Din von Muhammad, sallallahu 'alaihi wa salam, sind.
 
Drittens: Der Konsens der Sahabah bezüglich ihres Takfir auf die Banu Hanifah von den Anhängern von Musaylamah [=dem falschen Propheten zur Zeit des Propheten Muhammad, sallallahu 'alaihi wa salam] und anderen, wie es bekannt ist, trotz der Tatsache, dass die meisten vom „normalen" Volk waren und die Unwissenden jeden Schrei/Aufruf folgen, und beteten, fasteten und La ilaha illa Allah sagten. Aber all dass verhinderte nicht, dass sie mit Kufr, Schirk und Riddah gegenüber dem Din von Allah beurteilt wurden. Und die Sahabah behandelten alle auf die selbe Art, und urteilten mit dem selben Urteil, und sie trennten und unterschieden nicht zwischen deren Gruppen und deren einzelnen Personen, noch zwischen ihren Großen und Kleinen, noch zwischen deren Gelehrten und den Unwissenden, oder zwischen dem der folgt und dem welchem gefolgt wird. Und sie akzeptierten die Taubah [=Reue] nicht von jemanden, außer er lehnte Musaylamah und seinen Din ab und sagte sich vom Schirk und seinen Angehörigen los.
 
Viertens: Desweiteren gibt es im Buch und der Sunnah keinen einzigen Punkt, welcher darauf hin deutet, dass die erwähnten Zeichen (wie das Gebet usw...) als Beweis für den Islam in jeder Situation herangezogen werden müssen. Die Beweise in der Schariʿah weisen vielmehr darauf hin, dass die Zeichen nur dann berücksichtigt werden, wenn sie ein Beweis für die Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk und seinen Angehörigen sind, und wenn nicht, dann nicht. Weil es von den Kuffar und Muschrikun welche gibt, für die (die Bezeugung von) La ilaha illa Allah ausreichend ist (um in den Islam einzutreten), und es gibt welche, für die es nicht ausreichend ist, außer sie bezeugen dass al-Masih (also ʿIsa, 'alaihi salam) Sein Diener und Sein Gesandter ist, wie bei den Nasara (wenn sie in den Islam eintreten wollen), und es gibt weitere, wo dies nicht ausreicht, außer sie führen die Handlungen des Islam aus, wie der Murtad, welcher das verlassen muss, was der Grund für seine Riddah war (wie das Unterlassen des Gebets etc.) und Taubah macht von dieser und so weiter." [Hadha Dinuna, Seite 13-15]
http://graph.facebook.com/100004098621910/picture
Jul 1st 2013, 14:38
 
Es ist von Aslu din (Grundlage des islam ) jemanden als muschrik kafir in darul kufr anzusehen bis das gegenteil kommt bis man seine 100% Akida Tauhid festgestellt hatt das er Muslim ist
 
Al-Imam Ibnu Qudamah al-Maqdisi sagte: „Denn die Grundlage ist: wer in einem Dar ist, der
gehört zu seinen Leuten. Ihr Hukm wird auf ihn angewendet, solange kein Beweis für das
Gegenteil gekommen ist." [al-Mughni (5/24)]
 
Ibnu Nujaym sagt:
"Die Grundlage ist; dass der jenige, der (alleine) betet, der fastet, der eine unvollkommene Hajj macht, Sadaqa gibt
und Gottesdientliche Handlungen macht die auch die jenigen machen die einer anderen Religion angehören, nicht
den Hukm des Islaams bekommt. Und auch kann man mit den (Handlungen) wie der Tayammum welcher speziell
von unserer Shari'ah ist -aber nicht von den grundlegenden Gottesdiensten ist- nicht mit dem Islaam urteilen."
(al-Mawsuatu-l Quwaytiyya, 1/1380)
 
Imaamnu-n Nawawiyy sagt:
"Der Kaafir (aslii) wird nicht als Muslim angesehen (auch wenn) er das Gebet führt (Imaam ist), dem Imaam (im
Gebet) folgt, alleine, in der Masjid oder wo anders betet, egal wie. Und hierbei ist nicht zu beachten ob er sich im
Daaru-l Islaam oder Daaru-l Harb befindet. Das ist die Aussage die von Imaamu-sh Shafi'iyy in "Kitaabu-l Umm"
steht."
(Sharhu-l Muhadhdhab, 4/252)
 
Al-Imam Ibnu Hazm al-Andalusi sagte: „Das Dar wird auf demjenigen bezogen, der darüber herrscht, darin regiert und es besitzt." [al-Muhalla (11/200)]
 
Shaykh 'Abdul-Hakam al-Qahtani sagte: „Und wir sind überzeugt, dass die scheinbaren Zeichen/Anzeichen/Merkmale des Islam heutzutage nicht herangezogen werden – wie das Salah [=Gebet] und Siyam [=Fasten] und dergleichen, oder wenn jemand sagt, dass er Iman an Allah, Seine Engel, Seine Bücher, die Propheten und den letzten Tag hat, oder derjenige der behauptet auf dem Din des Islam zu sein, so wird er nicht als Muslim (wegen diesem angesehen), bis seine Lossagung vom Schirk und seinen Angehörigen bewiesen ist. Von dieser Angelegenheit ist folgendes:
 
Erstens: Dass die Bedingung für die Annahme der Aussagen und Handlungen einer Person um in den Islam einzutreten, der Punkt der Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk und seinen Angehörigen ist und dies ist das Zeichen, welches aufzeigt, dass er dem Islam folgt, und dieses wird herangezogen um von den Angehörigen des Schirk zu unterscheiden.
 
Auch wenn es ein Zeichen gibt, welches die Angehörigen des Islam und die Angehörigen des Schirk gemeinsam aufweisen (wie das Gebet in der heutigen Zeit), dann darf niemand jemanden auf dieser Basis als Muslim beurteilen – ganz zu schweigen, dass der Verstand ein Beweis für das Gegenteil (dieser Behauptung) ist. Denn die Aussprache von La ilaha illa Allah machte die Muschrikin von Mekka, zu Leuten welche es Sabian sagten [=jemand der den Din seines Volkes verlässt, um in einen anderen Din einzutreten; also hier vom Schirk in den Tawhid] und loyal zum Din von Muhammad, sallallahu 'alaihi wa salam, waren.
 
Also die Aussprache davon (von La ilaha illa Allah) war in dieser Zeit ein Beweis für die Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk und seinen Angehörigen. Doch heutzutage sagen es alle, welche behaupten den Din des Islam zu folgen und sicherlich weisen sie einige oder viele islamische Anzeichen auf. Auch die Herrscher, deren Helfer und ihre Soldaten machen dies (also La ilaha illa Allah sagen etc...). Selbst andere von den Milal [=Religionen] des Schirk machen dieses oder jenes (von den scheinbaren islamischen Anzeichen), wie die Grabanbeter, die Rawafid und dergleichen, welche weit entfernt sind vom Din (des Islam). Aus diesem Grund wird im Din bestimmt, dass der Islam nicht bewiesen wird nur durch die bloße Zuschreibung und Behauptung (zu diesem), sondern die Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk und seinen Angehörigen muss vor dem Urteil des Islam (über eine Person) festgestellt werden.
 
Zweitens: Die Einwohner von Mekka und jene um sie herum, waren auf dem Din von Ibrahim und Ismaʿil. Dann kam Amr ibnu Luhay al-Khuza'iy und schmückte den Schirk für die Menschen aus, und befahl ihnen die Statuen (Götzen) anzubeten. Somit verbreitete sich der Schirk und wurde vorherrschend in den Städten. Als dann der Prophet, sallallahu 'alaihi wa salam, entsandt wurde, beurteilte er sie (also die Menschen, welche behaupteten auf dem Din von Ibrahim zu sein) mit dem Schirk: {Sprich: „Oh ihr Kafirun!"} [109:1] Und er musste nicht berücksichtigen auf was sie sind, von den Überresten der Religion von Ibrahim, um über sie mit dem (Schirk) zu urteilen. Demzufolge urteilte er über sie nicht mit dem Islam, trotz (der Tatsache), dass sie Rituale wie die Hajj, 'Umrah, Tawaf al-Bayt, Sadaqah, Siyam, Ta'dhim al-Bayt al-Haram durchführten und an die Rububiyyah von Allah glaubten, dass Er der Schöpfer und Versorger ist. Noch beurteilte er sie auf dem Islam, weil sie behaupteten auf der Millah [=Gemeinschaft] von Ibrahim zu sein, noch wegen ihrer Prahlerei zu dieser, solange sie sich nicht frei vom Schirk und seinen Angehörigen waren.
 
Also auf die gleiche Weise wie der Prophet, sallallahu 'alaihi wa salam, es nicht als Beweis berücksichtigte für deren Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk und deren Verankerung im (wahren) Din von Ibrahim, welche Rituale sie (auch immer) durchführten und was sie vom Din von Ibrahim geerbt hatten, so sind auch die Rituale heutzutage (wie das Gebet etc.), welche von jenen praktiziert werden, die sich selber dem Islam zuschreiben, kein Beweis für deren Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk, und dass sie auf dem Din von Muhammad, sallallahu 'alaihi wa salam, sind.
 
Drittens: Der Konsens der Sahabah bezüglich ihres Takfir auf die Banu Hanifah von den Anhängern von Musaylamah [=dem falschen Propheten zur Zeit des Propheten Muhammad, sallallahu 'alaihi wa salam] und anderen, wie es bekannt ist, trotz der Tatsache, dass die meisten vom „normalen" Volk waren und die Unwissenden jeden Schrei/Aufruf folgen, und beteten, fasteten und La ilaha illa Allah sagten. Aber all dass verhinderte nicht, dass sie mit Kufr, Schirk und Riddah gegenüber dem Din von Allah beurteilt wurden. Und die Sahabah behandelten alle auf die selbe Art, und urteilten mit dem selben Urteil, und sie trennten und unterschieden nicht zwischen deren Gruppen und deren einzelnen Personen, noch zwischen ihren Großen und Kleinen, noch zwischen deren Gelehrten und den Unwissenden, oder zwischen dem der folgt und dem welchem gefolgt wird. Und sie akzeptierten die Taubah [=Reue] nicht von jemanden, außer er lehnte Musaylamah und seinen Din ab und sagte sich vom Schirk und seinen Angehörigen los.
 
Viertens: Desweiteren gibt es im Buch und der Sunnah keinen einzigen Punkt, welcher darauf hin deutet, dass die erwähnten Zeichen (wie das Gebet usw...) als Beweis für den Islam in jeder Situation herangezogen werden müssen. Die Beweise in der Schariʿah weisen vielmehr darauf hin, dass die Zeichen nur dann berücksichtigt werden, wenn sie ein Beweis für die Lossagung gegenüber dem Schirk und seinen Angehörigen sind, und wenn nicht, dann nicht. Weil es von den Kuffar und Muschrikun welche gibt, für die (die Bezeugung von) La ilaha illa Allah ausreichend ist (um in den Islam einzutreten), und es gibt welche, für die es nicht ausreichend ist, außer sie bezeugen dass al-Masih (also ʿIsa, 'alaihi salam) Sein Diener und Sein Gesandter ist, wie bei den Nasara (wenn sie in den Islam eintreten wollen), und es gibt weitere, wo dies nicht ausreicht, außer sie führen die Handlungen des Islam aus, wie der Murtad, welcher das verlassen muss, was der Grund für seine Riddah war (wie das Unterlassen des Gebets etc.) und Taubah macht von dieser und so weiter." [Hadha Dinuna, Seite 13-15]
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/KjGfWV


 

 Search Facebook Schirk: Der Gesandte Allahs (s.a.s) sagte einst zu einem seiner Gefährten:„Lies die Sure Kafirun. Dann schlafe.Denn diese Sure ist die Distanzierung vom Schirk." Abu Dawud

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 04:51PM +0100  

Search Facebook Schirk
 
Search Facebook Schirk
 
Der Gesandte Allahs (s.a.s) sagte einst zu einem seiner Gefährten:
„Lies die Sure Kafirun. Dann schlafe.
Denn diese Sure ist die Distanzierung vom Schirk." Abu Dawud
http://graph.facebook.com/100003711783299/picture
Jul 1st 2013, 15:00
 
Der Gesandte Allahs (s.a.s) sagte einst zu einem seiner Gefährten:
„Lies die Sure Kafirun. Dann schlafe.
Denn diese Sure ist die Distanzierung vom Schirk." Abu Dawud
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/KjGfWV


 

 Search Facebook Schirk: Der Gesandte Allahs (s.a.s) sagte einst zu einem seiner Gefährten:„Lies die Sure Kafirun. Dann schlafe. Denn diese Sure ist die Distanzierung vom Schirk." Abu Dawud ( I.D.)

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 04:51PM +0100  

Search Facebook Schirk
 
Search Facebook Schirk
 
Der Gesandte Allahs (s.a.s) sagte einst zu einem seiner Gefährten:
„Lies die Sure Kafirun. Dann schlafe.
Denn diese Sure ist die Distanzierung vom Schirk." Abu Dawud
( I.D.)
http://graph.facebook.com/270332736310766/picture
Jul 1st 2013, 15:01
 
Der Gesandte Allahs (s.a.s) sagte einst zu einem seiner Gefährten:
„Lies die Sure Kafirun. Dann schlafe.
Denn diese Sure ist die Distanzierung vom Schirk." Abu Dawud
( I.D.)
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/KjGfWV


 

 Search Facebook kalifat: Stoppt die finanzielle Unterstützung für die Islamisten....Jetzt....

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 04:51PM +0100  

Search Facebook kalifat
 
Search Facebook kalifat
 
Stoppt die finanzielle Unterstützung für die Islamisten....Jetzt....
http://graph.facebook.com/100000525470541/picture
Jun 30th 2013, 19:51
 
Eine grausame Bluttat, wie sie in moslemischen Ländern nicht selten vorkommt, wird nun in einem Video auf LiveLeaks gezeigt. Darin ist zu sehen wie syrische „Rebellen" zwei Christen, einer davon ist ein Priester, die Köpfe abschneiden. Eine blutberauschte Menge rundherum, darunter auch Kinder, schre...
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/3n59qT


 

 Search Facebook kalifat: Liberalizm, libertarianizm, libertynizm - to nie to samo.-

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 04:51PM +0100  

Search Facebook kalifat
 
Search Facebook kalifat
 
Liberalizm, libertarianizm, libertynizm - to nie to samo.-
http://graph.facebook.com/100001466235166/picture
Jul 1st 2013, 12:31
 
Na podstawie książki: Hans-Hermann Hoppe "Demokracja - bóg, który zawiódł" fijor.com
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/3n59qT


 

 Search Facebook kalifat: Israelischer Soldat boxt eine ältere FrauIsraelischer Soldat boxt eine ältere FrauWas außer dem Kalifat soll dieser Frau ihr Recht wieder bringen?Liken--> https://www.facebook.com/Islamisches.Erwachen

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 04:51PM +0100  

Search Facebook kalifat
 
Search Facebook kalifat
 
Israelischer Soldat boxt eine ältere Frau
 
Israelischer Soldat boxt eine ältere Frau
 
Was außer dem Kalifat soll dieser Frau ihr Recht wieder bringen?
 
Liken--> https://www.facebook.com/Islamisches.Erwachen
http://graph.facebook.com/1787255096/picture
Jul 1st 2013, 15:21
 
Israelischer Soldat boxt eine ältere Frau
 
Was außer dem Kalifat soll dieser Frau ihr Recht wieder bringen?
 
Liken--> https://www.facebook.com/Islamisches.Erwachen
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/3n59qT


 

 Search Facebook kufr: Eclaircissement de la position de Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb face aux Ottomans.Certains des ennemis de la da'wah salafiyyah ont prétendu que Sheikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb s'était divisé/séparé du Khalifat ottoman et avait ainsi quitté la Djamâ'ah en toute désobéissance.Ibn Faliq décrit le « tawhîd » des suiveurs de la « Da'wah Salafiyyah » [L'appel sur le chemin des Anciens pieux prédécesseurs] de la sorte : « Quant à leur tawhîd, il comprend le fait de sortir contre les musulmans...et ceci est de la mécréance , non du tawhîd ».S'adressant à eux [aux Wahhabites], 'Omar Al-Mahjoub a dit : « ...et vous êtes tombés dans la désobéissance ». Ibn 'Abidîn dans son commentaire a décrit les suiveurs de cette da'wah comme étant des « Khawaridjs », sous le chapitre intitulé : « Les injustes/oppresseurs (al boughât) », et ce sont ceux qui vont contre l'obéissance due à l'Imâm, sans aucune preuve [pour faire cela]. [1]Dahlan prétend que les suiveurs de SHeikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb : « ...se sont émancipés de la Djamâ'ah ». [2]Az-Zahawî prétend de même qu'ils sont connus pour : « .. Déserter l'obéissance dûe au Amîr al-Mou'minîn [Emir des croyants] ».Bien des ennemis de la da'wah ont décrit le Sheikh et ses suiveurs comme des Khawaridjs, car l'un des attributs des Khawaridjs est qu'ils sortent contre l'Imâm des musulmans, et ils deviennent désobéissants aussitôt qu'ils observent des péchés de cet Imâm, qui sont largement moindres que des « Kufr Akbar » [grande mécréance].Et ceci est illustré par ce que Al-Amlî dit : « Les Khawaridjs ont rendu le combat contre les rois des musulmans et le fait de sortir contre eux, permis.... de même les Wahhabites ».L'auteur du livre « Résumé de l'Histoire des Arabes » inclut un chapitre dans son livre intitulé : « L'insurrection des Wahhabites contre l'obéissance ».Abd ul-Qadim prétend que l'apparition du Wahhabismes fut l'une des raisons derrière la chute du Khalifa ; il dit : « Les Wahhabites ont fondé un état au sein même de l'Etat Islamique, sous le commandement de Muhammad Ibn Sa'oud, puis de son fils Abdel 'Aziz. L'Angleterre les a soutenus avec des armes et de l'argent, et, basés sur l'idéologie, ils se sont mis en avant dans la conquête de terres islamiques qui étaient sous le contrôle de Sultans, en d'autres termes, ils ont brandi l'épée contre le Calife et assassiné l'armée musulmane, l'armée du Amîr al-Mou'minîn [Emir des Croyants] par le biais de l'instigation et du soutien de l'Angleterre ».Et avant de commencer à répondre aux accusations portées contre Sheikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb de révolte contre le Calife, il est bon de mentionner ce que le SHeikh tenait comme croyance nécessitant l'obéissance à l'Imâm des musulmans, qu'ils soient des hommes pieux ou des pécheurs, sauf s'ils ordonnent une désobéissance à Allah, car l'obéissance envers eux ne s'engage que dans les choses qui sont bonnes. Le « Sheikh » dit dans sa lettre adressée aux gens de Qassîm : « Et je tiens pour croyance l'obligation de se soummettre et d'être obéissant envers les Imams des mouslims, ceux qui sont droits tout comme ceux qui sont pécheurs parmi eux, tant qu'ils n'ordonnent pas une désobéissance à Allâh, et envers la personne responsable du Khalifa . Celui autour duquel les gens se sont réunis et l'ont accepté, de même que celui qui a forcé son chemin pour devenir Calife, l'obéissance envers lui est obligatoire, et se révolter contre lui est « harâm » [interdit] ».Il dit également :« La troisième base : afin de rendre notre résumé complet, nous devons écouter et obéir à ceux qui nous dirigent, même s'il est un esclave Abissin, et Allâh a expliqué ceci complètement dans de nombreuses formes d'explications, législatives et destinées [note du traducteur : révélation du destin] - [3], et cette base est devenue inconnue à bon nombre de ceux qui prétendent avoir de la science, sans jamais se soucier de la mettre en pratique. »En répondant à de telles allégations, une question se doit d'être posée : le Nadj, fut-il le lieu de base de ce mouvement, sous le contrôle du « Khalifat Ottoman » ?Dr Sâlih al-'Ubud répond :« En général, le « Nadj » n'a jamais été témoin de la souveraineté des Ottomans, car leur pouvoir ne l'a jamais atteint, ni leurs gouverneurs, et à aucun moment précédant l'époque de Sheikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb un drapeau Turk n'y fut mis en berne. Ce qui prouve cette réalité est la lecture faite à travers la division des contrées que les Ottomans gouvernaient. Un traité établi par Yamin 'Ali Afandî [qui fut le trésorier du livre Hanaqî en l'an 1018H/1609], et intitulé « Les lois des Ottomans/ les contenus du livre de Diwan », révèle qu' à partir du onzième siècle, le Khilafa Ottoman se divisa en deux parties distinctes (iyala), et les quatorze qui en composent chacune sont arabes, et le Nadj n'est pas inclus dans celles-ci, excepté pour « Al-Ihsa », si on devait le considérer comme faisant partie du Nadj. »Sheikh 'Abdullâh Al-'Uthaymîne dit :« Avant que surgisse l'appel de Sheikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb , le Nadj n'était pas sous domination directe des Ottomans, ni n'a été témoin d'aucune souveraineté d'eux dans une de ses parties. Bani Jabr, Bani Khalid, et les Sharif n'étaient point des souverains, et les conflits armés entre tribus du Nadj étaient de coutume. »Dr Ajil an-Nashmî dit :« Le Khilâfa ne prêtait pas attention au Nadj et a ses territoires voisins. Cette ligne de conduite peut être attribuée à l'immensité du Nadj d'une part, et d'autre part à la présence de la fragmentation tribale en son sein ».Ce qui prouve que la position du SHeikh était bonne et que le Sheikh n'a pas hésité quant au fait que son mouvement n'était pas lié au Khilâfa est la lettre envoyée à Fadil Al-Mazid , le gouverneur du désert Syrien :« Cette chose qu'ils ont désapprouvée de moi, qu'ils ont détestée de moi et qui a créé l'inimitié entre eux et moi, s'ils interrogent quelque savant que ce soit en Syrie ou au Yémen ou autres dessus, ces derniers diront : c'est la vérité et c'est la religion d'Allâh et de Son messager (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam). Cependant, je ne puis la rendre publique dans ma contrée car l'état ne l'approuve pas", et Ibn 'Abd el-Wahhâb put le faire car le gouverneur de sa contrée ne l'a pas désapprouvé, plutôt, lorsqu'il sut la vérité, il la suivit..Quant aux allégations de « dhulm » [injustice, tyrannie, oppression] comme quoi le mouvement de SHeikh fut l'une des raisons pour la chute du Khilâfa, et que les Anglais aidèrent les Wahhabites à atteindre ce but, alors Muhammad Mahdi al-Istanbulî répond à cette piètre accusation :« Il incombe à cet auteur d'appuyer son opinion avec des preuves, et , dans le passé, le poète a dit : si les accusations ne sont pas basées sur des preuves/ des textes, alors c'est une preuve de sottise. Au contraire, l'Histoire révèle que les Anglais furent opposés à ce mouvement dès le départ, craignant un renouveau du monde islamique ».Al-Istanbulî dit aussi :« Il est étrange, à la fois amusant et désolant que cet auteur accuse le mouvement du SHeikh d'être l'une des causes de la chute du Khalifat ottoman. Il est inutile de dire que ce mouvement fut fondé en l'an 1811, et que le Khalifat fut détruit l'année 1922. »Et ce qui prouve que les Anglais étaient contre le mouvement Wahhabites est qu'ils envoyèrent leur capitaine Foster Saddler afin de féliciter Ibrahim Pasha de la victoire qu'il avait obtenue sur les Wahhabites - désignant là la bataille de Dar'iyyah - et de confirmer également combien enclin ce dernier était à coopérer avec le British Act contre le piratage des Wahhabites dans le Golf Arabic [des attaques/kidnapping extrêmement agressifs envers des vaisseaux anglais Royaux qui parcouraient le Golf et l'Océan indien transportant les trésors d'Inde vers l'Empire étaient menés par des centres Wahhabites connus sur la côte du Golf - qui , jusqu'aussi récemment que dans les années 50, était désigné sur les cartes internationales comme la côte des pirates - tel que Sharjah et Rasoul-Khaymah].Bien plus, cette lettre affirme clairement l'intention du gouvernement britannique de créer un accord avec Ibrahim Pasha, dans l'intention d'annihiler le contrôle des Wahhabites.Sheikh Mohammad Ibn Mandthour an-Nawmanî dit :« Les Anglais ont utilisé la position en Inde qui s'opposait à Sheikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb afin de lancer à quiconque s'opposait à eux le label de " Wahhabite". Et de cette façon, les Anglais appelèrent les savants de la ville de Déonband en Inde les Wahhabites, dû à leur opposition aux anglais ».Plutôt, le prêtre Zuimer mentionna que les Wahhabites en Inde ne propageaient pas leur dogme car l'appel au Djihâd contre les anglais leur était attribué. [4][1] Hâshiyah Ibn-'Abidîn - 4/262.[2] ad-Durar us-Sunniyyah fir-Radd al-Wahhâbiyyah - pg. 23[3] Hadith n°28, arba'în an-nawawiyah[4] Kitab Réfutation des accusations des opposants à la da'wah de Muhammad Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 04:43PM +0100  

Search Facebook kufr
 
Search Facebook kufr
 
Eclaircissement de la position de Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb face aux Ottomans.
Certains des ennemis de la da'wah salafiyyah ont prétendu que Sheikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb s'était divisé/séparé du Khalifat ottoman et avait ainsi quitté la Djamâ'ah en toute désobéissance.
Ibn Faliq décrit le « tawhîd » des suiveurs de la « Da'wah Salafiyyah » [L'appel sur le chemin des Anciens pieux prédécesseurs] de la sorte : « Quant à leur tawhîd, il comprend le fait de sortir contre les musulmans...et ceci est de la mécréance , non du tawhîd ».
 
S'adressant à eux [aux Wahhabites], 'Omar Al-Mahjoub a dit : « ...et vous êtes tombés dans la désobéissance ».
Ibn 'Abidîn dans son commentaire a décrit les suiveurs de cette da'wah comme étant des « Khawaridjs », sous le chapitre intitulé : « Les injustes/oppresseurs (al boughât) », et ce sont ceux qui vont contre l'obéissance due à l'Imâm, sans aucune preuve [pour faire cela]. [1]
 
Dahlan prétend que les suiveurs de SHeikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb : « ...se sont émancipés de la Djamâ'ah ». [2]
 
Az-Zahawî prétend de même qu'ils sont connus pour : « .. Déserter l'obéissance dûe au Amîr al-Mou'minîn [Emir des croyants] ».
 
Bien des ennemis de la da'wah ont décrit le Sheikh et ses suiveurs comme des Khawaridjs, car l'un des attributs des Khawaridjs est qu'ils sortent contre l'Imâm des musulmans, et ils deviennent désobéissants aussitôt qu'ils observent des péchés de cet Imâm, qui sont largement moindres que des « Kufr Akbar » [grande mécréance].
 
Et ceci est illustré par ce que Al-Amlî dit : « Les Khawaridjs ont rendu le combat contre les rois des musulmans et le fait de sortir contre eux, permis.... de même les Wahhabites ».
 
L'auteur du livre « Résumé de l'Histoire des Arabes » inclut un chapitre dans son livre intitulé : « L'insurrection des Wahhabites contre l'obéissance ».
 
Abd ul-Qadim prétend que l'apparition du Wahhabismes fut l'une des raisons derrière la chute du Khalifa ; il dit : « Les Wahhabites ont fondé un état au sein même de l'Etat Islamique, sous le commandement de Muhammad Ibn Sa'oud, puis de son fils Abdel 'Aziz. L'Angleterre les a soutenus avec des armes et de l'argent, et, basés sur l'idéologie, ils se sont mis en avant dans la conquête de terres islamiques qui étaient sous le contrôle de Sultans, en d'autres termes, ils ont brandi l'épée contre le Calife et assassiné l'armée musulmane, l'armée du Amîr al-Mou'minîn [Emir des Croyants] par le biais de l'instigation et du soutien de l'Angleterre ».
Et avant de commencer à répondre aux accusations portées contre Sheikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb de révolte contre le Calife, il est bon de mentionner ce que le SHeikh tenait comme croyance nécessitant l'obéissance à l'Imâm des musulmans, qu'ils soient des hommes pieux ou des pécheurs, sauf s'ils ordonnent une désobéissance à Allah, car l'obéissance envers eux ne s'engage que dans les choses qui sont bonnes.
 
Le « Sheikh » dit dans sa lettre adressée aux gens de Qassîm : « Et je tiens pour croyance l'obligation de se soummettre et d'être obéissant envers les Imams des mouslims, ceux qui sont droits tout comme ceux qui sont pécheurs parmi eux, tant qu'ils n'ordonnent pas une désobéissance à Allâh, et envers la personne responsable du Khalifa . Celui autour duquel les gens se sont réunis et l'ont accepté, de même que celui qui a forcé son chemin pour devenir Calife, l'obéissance envers lui est obligatoire, et se révolter contre lui est « harâm » [interdit] ».
 
Il dit également :
« La troisième base : afin de rendre notre résumé complet, nous devons écouter et obéir à ceux qui nous dirigent, même s'il est un esclave Abissin, et Allâh a expliqué ceci complètement dans de nombreuses formes d'explications, législatives et destinées [note du traducteur : révélation du destin] - [3], et cette base est devenue inconnue à bon nombre de ceux qui prétendent avoir de la science, sans jamais se soucier de la mettre en pratique. »
 
En répondant à de telles allégations, une question se doit d'être posée : le Nadj, fut-il le lieu de base de ce mouvement, sous le contrôle du « Khalifat Ottoman » ?
 
Dr Sâlih al-'Ubud répond :
« En général, le « Nadj » n'a jamais été témoin de la souveraineté des Ottomans, car leur pouvoir ne l'a jamais atteint, ni leurs gouverneurs, et à aucun moment précédant l'époque de Sheikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb un drapeau Turk n'y fut mis en berne. Ce qui prouve cette réalité est la lecture faite à travers la division des contrées que les Ottomans gouvernaient. Un traité établi par Yamin 'Ali Afandî [qui fut le trésorier du livre Hanaqî en l'an 1018H/1609], et intitulé « Les lois des Ottomans/ les contenus du livre de Diwan », révèle qu' à partir du onzième siècle, le Khilafa Ottoman se divisa en deux parties distinctes (iyala), et les quatorze qui en composent chacune sont arabes, et le Nadj n'est pas inclus dans celles-ci, excepté pour « Al-Ihsa », si on devait le considérer comme faisant partie du Nadj. »
 
Sheikh 'Abdullâh Al-'Uthaymîne dit :
« Avant que surgisse l'appel de Sheikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb , le Nadj n'était pas sous domination directe des Ottomans, ni n'a été témoin d'aucune souveraineté d'eux dans une de ses parties. Bani Jabr, Bani Khalid, et les Sharif n'étaient point des souverains, et les conflits armés entre tribus du Nadj étaient de coutume. »
 
Dr Ajil an-Nashmî dit :
« Le Khilâfa ne prêtait pas attention au Nadj et a ses territoires voisins. Cette ligne de conduite peut être attribuée à l'immensité du Nadj d'une part, et d'autre part à la présence de la fragmentation tribale en son sein ».
 
Ce qui prouve que la position du SHeikh était bonne et que le Sheikh n'a pas hésité quant au fait que son mouvement n'était pas lié au Khilâfa est la lettre envoyée à Fadil Al-Mazid , le gouverneur du désert Syrien :
 
« Cette chose qu'ils ont désapprouvée de moi, qu'ils ont détestée de moi et qui a créé l'inimitié entre eux et moi, s'ils interrogent quelque savant que ce soit en Syrie ou au Yémen ou autres dessus, ces derniers diront : c'est la vérité et c'est la religion d'Allâh et de Son messager (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam). Cependant, je ne puis la rendre publique dans ma contrée car l'état ne l'approuve pas", et Ibn 'Abd el-Wahhâb put le faire car le gouverneur de sa contrée ne l'a pas désapprouvé, plutôt, lorsqu'il sut la vérité, il la suivit..
 
Quant aux allégations de « dhulm » [injustice, tyrannie, oppression] comme quoi le mouvement de SHeikh fut l'une des raisons pour la chute du Khilâfa, et que les Anglais aidèrent les Wahhabites à atteindre ce but, alors Muhammad Mahdi al-Istanbulî répond à cette piètre accusation :
« Il incombe à cet auteur d'appuyer son opinion avec des preuves, et , dans le passé, le poète a dit : si les accusations ne sont pas basées sur des preuves/ des textes, alors c'est une preuve de sottise. Au contraire, l'Histoire révèle que les Anglais furent opposés à ce mouvement dès le départ, craignant un renouveau du monde islamique ».
 
Al-Istanbulî dit aussi :
« Il est étrange, à la fois amusant et désolant que cet auteur accuse le mouvement du SHeikh d'être l'une des causes de la chute du Khalifat ottoman. Il est inutile de dire que ce mouvement fut fondé en l'an 1811, et que le Khalifat fut détruit l'année 1922. »
 
Et ce qui prouve que les Anglais étaient contre le mouvement Wahhabites est qu'ils envoyèrent leur capitaine Foster Saddler afin de féliciter Ibrahim Pasha de la victoire qu'il avait obtenue sur les Wahhabites - désignant là la bataille de Dar'iyyah - et de confirmer également combien enclin ce dernier était à coopérer avec le British Act contre le piratage des Wahhabites dans le Golf Arabic [des attaques/kidnapping extrêmement agressifs envers des vaisseaux anglais Royaux qui parcouraient le Golf et l'Océan indien transportant les trésors d'Inde vers l'Empire étaient menés par des centres Wahhabites connus sur la côte du Golf - qui , jusqu'aussi récemment que dans les années 50, était désigné sur les cartes internationales comme la côte des pirates - tel que Sharjah et Rasoul-Khaymah].
Bien plus, cette lettre affirme clairement l'intention du gouvernement britannique de créer un accord avec Ibrahim Pasha, dans l'intention d'annihiler le contrôle des Wahhabites.
Sheikh Mohammad Ibn Mandthour an-Nawmanî dit :
« Les Anglais ont utilisé la position en Inde qui s'opposait à Sheikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb afin de lancer à quiconque s'opposait à eux le label de " Wahhabite". Et de cette façon, les Anglais appelèrent les savants de la ville de Déonband en Inde les Wahhabites, dû à leur opposition aux anglais ».
 
Plutôt, le prêtre Zuimer mentionna que les Wahhabites en Inde ne propageaient pas leur dogme car l'appel au Djihâd contre les anglais leur était attribué. [4]
 
[1] Hâshiyah Ibn-'Abidîn - 4/262.
[2] ad-Durar us-Sunniyyah fir-Radd al-Wahhâbiyyah - pg. 23
[3] Hadith n°28, arba'în an-nawawiyah
[4] Kitab Réfutation des accusations des opposants à la da'wah de Muhammad Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb
http://graph.facebook.com/168470666639939/picture
Jul 1st 2013, 15:26
 
Eclaircissement de la position de Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb face aux Ottomans.
Certains des ennemis de la da'wah salafiyyah ont prétendu que Sheikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb s'était divisé/séparé du Khalifat ottoman et avait ainsi quitté la Djamâ'ah en toute désobéissance.
Ibn Faliq décrit le « tawhîd » des suiveurs de la « Da'wah Salafiyyah » [L'appel sur le chemin des Anciens pieux prédécesseurs] de la sorte : « Quant à leur tawhîd, il comprend le fait de sortir contre les musulmans...et ceci est de la mécréance , non du tawhîd ».
 
S'adressant à eux [aux Wahhabites], 'Omar Al-Mahjoub a dit : « ...et vous êtes tombés dans la désobéissance ».
Ibn 'Abidîn dans son commentaire a décrit les suiveurs de cette da'wah comme étant des « Khawaridjs », sous le chapitre intitulé : « Les injustes/oppresseurs (al boughât) », et ce sont ceux qui vont contre l'obéissance due à l'Imâm, sans aucune preuve [pour faire cela]. [1]
 
Dahlan prétend que les suiveurs de SHeikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb : « ...se sont émancipés de la Djamâ'ah ». [2]
 
Az-Zahawî prétend de même qu'ils sont connus pour : « .. Déserter l'obéissance dûe au Amîr al-Mou'minîn [Emir des croyants] ».
 
Bien des ennemis de la da'wah ont décrit le Sheikh et ses suiveurs comme des Khawaridjs, car l'un des attributs des Khawaridjs est qu'ils sortent contre l'Imâm des musulmans, et ils deviennent désobéissants aussitôt qu'ils observent des péchés de cet Imâm, qui sont largement moindres que des « Kufr Akbar » [grande mécréance].
 
Et ceci est illustré par ce que Al-Amlî dit : « Les Khawaridjs ont rendu le combat contre les rois des musulmans et le fait de sortir contre eux, permis.... de même les Wahhabites ».
 
L'auteur du livre « Résumé de l'Histoire des Arabes » inclut un chapitre dans son livre intitulé : « L'insurrection des Wahhabites contre l'obéissance ».
 
Abd ul-Qadim prétend que l'apparition du Wahhabismes fut l'une des raisons derrière la chute du Khalifa ; il dit : « Les Wahhabites ont fondé un état au sein même de l'Etat Islamique, sous le commandement de Muhammad Ibn Sa'oud, puis de son fils Abdel 'Aziz. L'Angleterre les a soutenus avec des armes et de l'argent, et, basés sur l'idéologie, ils se sont mis en avant dans la conquête de terres islamiques qui étaient sous le contrôle de Sultans, en d'autres termes, ils ont brandi l'épée contre le Calife et assassiné l'armée musulmane, l'armée du Amîr al-Mou'minîn [Emir des Croyants] par le biais de l'instigation et du soutien de l'Angleterre ».
Et avant de commencer à répondre aux accusations portées contre Sheikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb de révolte contre le Calife, il est bon de mentionner ce que le SHeikh tenait comme croyance nécessitant l'obéissance à l'Imâm des musulmans, qu'ils soient des hommes pieux ou des pécheurs, sauf s'ils ordonnent une désobéissance à Allah, car l'obéissance envers eux ne s'engage que dans les choses qui sont bonnes.
 
Le « Sheikh » dit dans sa lettre adressée aux gens de Qassîm : « Et je tiens pour croyance l'obligation de se soummettre et d'être obéissant envers les Imams des mouslims, ceux qui sont droits tout comme ceux qui sont pécheurs parmi eux, tant qu'ils n'ordonnent pas une désobéissance à Allâh, et envers la personne responsable du Khalifa . Celui autour duquel les gens se sont réunis et l'ont accepté, de même que celui qui a forcé son chemin pour devenir Calife, l'obéissance envers lui est obligatoire, et se révolter contre lui est « harâm » [interdit] ».
 
Il dit également :
« La troisième base : afin de rendre notre résumé complet, nous devons écouter et obéir à ceux qui nous dirigent, même s'il est un esclave Abissin, et Allâh a expliqué ceci complètement dans de nombreuses formes d'explications, législatives et destinées [note du traducteur : révélation du destin] - [3], et cette base est devenue inconnue à bon nombre de ceux qui prétendent avoir de la science, sans jamais se soucier de la mettre en pratique. »
 
En répondant à de telles allégations, une question se doit d'être posée : le Nadj, fut-il le lieu de base de ce mouvement, sous le contrôle du « Khalifat Ottoman » ?
 
Dr Sâlih al-'Ubud répond :
« En général, le « Nadj » n'a jamais été témoin de la souveraineté des Ottomans, car leur pouvoir ne l'a jamais atteint, ni leurs gouverneurs, et à aucun moment précédant l'époque de Sheikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb un drapeau Turk n'y fut mis en berne. Ce qui prouve cette réalité est la lecture faite à travers la division des contrées que les Ottomans gouvernaient. Un traité établi par Yamin 'Ali Afandî [qui fut le trésorier du livre Hanaqî en l'an 1018H/1609], et intitulé « Les lois des Ottomans/ les contenus du livre de Diwan », révèle qu' à partir du onzième siècle, le Khilafa Ottoman se divisa en deux parties distinctes (iyala), et les quatorze qui en composent chacune sont arabes, et le Nadj n'est pas inclus dans celles-ci, excepté pour « Al-Ihsa », si on devait le considérer comme faisant partie du Nadj. »
 
Sheikh 'Abdullâh Al-'Uthaymîne dit :
« Avant que surgisse l'appel de Sheikh Muhammed Ibn Abd el-Wahhâb , le Nadj n'était pas sous domination directe des Ottomans, ni n'a été témoin d'aucune souveraineté d'eux dans une de ses parties. Bani Jabr, Bani Khalid, et les Sharif n'étaient point des souverains, et les conflits armés entre tribus du Nadj étaient de coutume. »
 
Dr Ajil an-Nashmî dit :
« Le Khilâfa ne prêtait pas attention au Nadj et a ses territoires voisins. Cette ligne de conduite peut être attribuée à l'immensité du Nadj d'une part, et d'autre part à la présence de la fragmentation tribale en son sein ».
 
Ce qui prouve que la position du SHeikh était bonne et que le Sheikh n'a pas hésité quant au fait que son mouvement n'était pas lié au Khilâfa est la lettre envoyée à Fadil Al-Mazid , le gouverneur du désert Syrien :
 
« Cette chose qu'ils ont désapprouvée de moi, qu'ils ont détestée de moi et qui a créé l'inimitié entre eux et moi, s'ils interrogent quelque savant que ce soit en Syrie ou au Yémen ou autres dessus, ces derniers diront : c'est la vérité et c'est la religion d'Allâh et de Son messager (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam). Cependant, je ne puis la rendre publique dans ma contrée car l'état ne l'approuve

 

 Search Facebook kufr: Duniya ka sab say aasan kaam...... Doosroon par kufr kay fatway lagana...... :) Aur Fatway Lga kar Khud Kufriya Kamoon ki Bharmaar kar dena,,, Baba

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 04:43PM +0100  

Search Facebook kufr
 
Search Facebook kufr
 
Duniya ka sab say aasan kaam......
 
Doosroon par kufr kay fatway lagana...... :)
Aur Fatway Lga kar Khud Kufriya Kamoon ki Bharmaar kar dena,,,
Baba
http://graph.facebook.com/260337675781/picture
Jul 1st 2013, 15:01
 
Duniya ka sab say aasan kaam......
 
Doosroon par kufr kay fatway lagana...... :)
Aur Fatway Lga kar Khud Kufriya Kamoon ki Bharmaar kar dena,,,
Baba
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/nZS8k4


 

 Search Facebook kufr: Six Kalimas in English Tajveed1) Kalma Tayyab: Laa ilaaha illal Lahoo Mohammadur Rasool Ullah2) Kalma Shaadat: Ashahado An Laa ilaaha illal Laho Wahdahoo Laa Shareeka Lahoo Wa Ash Hado Anna Mohammadan Abdo Hoo Wa Rasoolohoo.3) Kalma Tamjeed: Subhanallahe Wal Hamdulillahe Wa Laa ilaha illal Laho Wallahooakbar. Wala Haola Wala Quwwata illa billahil AliYil Azeem.4) Kalma Tauheed: Laa ilaha illal Lahoo Wahdahoo Laa Shareekalahoo Lahul Mulko Walahul Hamdo Yuhee Wa Yumeeto Wa Hoa Haiy Yul La Yamooto Abadan Abada Zul Jalali Wal ikraam Beyadihil Khair. Wa hoa Ala Kulli Shai In Qadeer.5) Kalma Astaghfar: Astaghfirullah Rabbi Min Kullay Zambin Aznabtuho Amadan Ao Khat An Sirran Ao Alaniatan Wa Atoobo ilaihe Minaz Zambil Lazee Aalamo Wa Minaz Zambil Lazee La Aalamo innaka Anta Allamul Ghuyoobi Wa Sattaarul Oyobi Wa Ghaffaruz Zunoobi Wala Haola Wala Quwwata illa billahil AliYil Azeem.6) Kalma Radde Kufr: Allah Humma inni Aaoozubika Min An Oshrika Beka Shai Aown Wa Anaa Aalamo Behi Wa Astaghfiroka Lima laa Aalamo Behi Tubtu Anho Wa Tabarrato Minal Kufri Washshirki Wal Kizbi Wal Jheebati Wal Bidaati Wan Nameemati Wal Fawahishi Wal Bohtani Wal Maasi Kulliha Wa Aslamtoo Wa Aamantoo Wa Aqoolo Laa ilaaha illal Lahoo Mohammadur Rasool Ullah.انگریزی میں چھ Kalimas Tajveed1) Kalma طیب: لاالہ illal Lahoo Mohammadur رسول اللہ2) Kalma Shaadat: Ashahado ایک لاالہ illal Laho Wahdahoo لا الہ Shareeka Lahoo و راھ Hado ینا محمڈن Abdo Rasoolohoo و ہو.3) Kalma Tamjeed: Subhanallahe وال Hamdulillahe و لا الہ الہ الا اللہ illal Laho Wallahooakbar. والا Haola والا Quwwata الا billahil AliYil عظیم.4) Kalma Tauheed: لا الہ الہ الا اللہ illal Lahoo Wahdahoo لا الہ Shareekalahoo Lahul Mulko Walahul Hamdo Yuhee و Yumeeto و ہوآ Haiy Yul لا Yamooto آبادان Abada جسے جلالی وال ikraam Beyadihil خیر. قدیر میں ہوآ و اعلی Kulli Shai.5) Kalma Astaghfar: Astaghfirullah ربی من Kullay Zambin Aznabtuho Amadan AO Khat ایک Sirran AO Alaniatan و Atoobo ilaihe Minaz Zambil Lazee Aalamo و Minaz Zambil Lazee لا Aalamo innaka Anta Allamul Ghuyoobi و Sattaarul Oyobi و Ghaffaruz Zunoobi والا Haola والا Quwwata الا billahil AliYil عظیم.6) Kalma Radde کفر: اللہ ہما inni Aaoozubika کم سے کم ایک Oshrika Beka Shai Aown و Anaa Aalamo Behi و Astaghfiroka لیما لا Aalamo Behi Tubtu Anho و Tabarrato Minal Kufri Washshirki وال Kizbi وال Jheebati وال Bidaati وان Nameemati وال Fawahishi وال Bohtani وال Maasi Kulliha و Aslamtoo و Aamantoo و Aqoolo لاالہ illal Lahoo Mohammadur رسول اللہ.

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 04:43PM +0100  

Search Facebook kufr
 
Search Facebook kufr
 
Six Kalimas in English Tajveed
 
1) Kalma Tayyab: Laa ilaaha illal Lahoo Mohammadur Rasool Ullah
 
2) Kalma Shaadat: Ashahado An Laa ilaaha illal Laho Wahdahoo Laa Shareeka Lahoo Wa Ash Hado Anna Mohammadan Abdo Hoo Wa Rasoolohoo.
 
3) Kalma Tamjeed: Subhanallahe Wal Hamdulillahe Wa Laa ilaha illal Laho Wallahooakbar. Wala Haola Wala Quwwata illa billahil AliYil Azeem.
 
4) Kalma Tauheed: Laa ilaha illal Lahoo Wahdahoo Laa Shareekalahoo Lahul Mulko Walahul Hamdo Yuhee Wa Yumeeto Wa Hoa Haiy Yul La Yamooto Abadan Abada Zul Jalali Wal ikraam Beyadihil Khair. Wa hoa Ala Kulli Shai In Qadeer.
 
5) Kalma Astaghfar: Astaghfirullah Rabbi Min Kullay Zambin Aznabtuho Amadan Ao Khat An Sirran Ao Alaniatan Wa Atoobo ilaihe Minaz Zambil Lazee Aalamo Wa Minaz Zambil Lazee La Aalamo innaka Anta Allamul Ghuyoobi Wa Sattaarul Oyobi Wa Ghaffaruz Zunoobi Wala Haola Wala Quwwata illa billahil AliYil Azeem.
 
6) Kalma Radde Kufr: Allah Humma inni Aaoozubika Min An Oshrika Beka Shai Aown Wa Anaa Aalamo Behi Wa Astaghfiroka Lima laa Aalamo Behi Tubtu Anho Wa Tabarrato Minal Kufri Washshirki Wal Kizbi Wal Jheebati Wal Bidaati Wan Nameemati Wal Fawahishi Wal Bohtani Wal Maasi Kulliha Wa Aslamtoo Wa Aamantoo Wa Aqoolo Laa ilaaha illal Lahoo Mohammadur Rasool Ullah.انگریزی میں چھ Kalimas Tajveed
 
1) Kalma طیب: لاالہ illal Lahoo Mohammadur رسول اللہ
 
2) Kalma Shaadat: Ashahado ایک لاالہ illal Laho Wahdahoo لا الہ Shareeka Lahoo و راھ Hado ینا محمڈن Abdo Rasoolohoo و ہو.
 
3) Kalma Tamjeed: Subhanallahe وال Hamdulillahe و لا الہ الہ الا اللہ illal Laho Wallahooakbar. والا Haola والا Quwwata الا billahil AliYil عظیم.
 
4) Kalma Tauheed: لا الہ الہ الا اللہ illal Lahoo Wahdahoo لا الہ Shareekalahoo Lahul Mulko Walahul Hamdo Yuhee و Yumeeto و ہوآ Haiy Yul لا Yamooto آبادان Abada جسے جلالی وال ikraam Beyadihil خیر. قدیر میں ہوآ و اعلی Kulli Shai.
 
5) Kalma Astaghfar: Astaghfirullah ربی من Kullay Zambin Aznabtuho Amadan AO Khat ایک Sirran AO Alaniatan و Atoobo ilaihe Minaz Zambil Lazee Aalamo و Minaz Zambil Lazee لا Aalamo innaka Anta Allamul Ghuyoobi و Sattaarul Oyobi و Ghaffaruz Zunoobi والا Haola والا Quwwata الا billahil AliYil عظیم.
 
6) Kalma Radde کفر: اللہ ہما inni Aaoozubika کم سے کم ایک Oshrika Beka Shai Aown و Anaa Aalamo Behi و Astaghfiroka لیما لا Aalamo Behi Tubtu Anho و Tabarrato Minal Kufri Washshirki وال Kizbi وال Jheebati وال Bidaati وان Nameemati وال Fawahishi وال Bohtani وال Maasi Kulliha و Aslamtoo و Aamantoo و Aqoolo لاالہ illal Lahoo Mohammadur رسول اللہ.
http://graph.facebook.com/472678972760954/picture
Jul 1st 2013, 14:57
 
Six Kalimas in English Tajveed
 
1) Kalma Tayyab: Laa ilaaha illal Lahoo Mohammadur Rasool Ullah
 
2) Kalma Shaadat: Ashahado An Laa ilaaha illal Laho Wahdahoo Laa Shareeka Lahoo Wa Ash Hado Anna Mohammadan Abdo Hoo Wa Rasoolohoo.
 
3) Kalma Tamjeed: Subhanallahe Wal Hamdulillahe Wa Laa ilaha illal Laho Wallahooakbar. Wala Haola Wala Quwwata illa billahil AliYil Azeem.
 
4) Kalma Tauheed: Laa ilaha illal Lahoo Wahdahoo Laa Shareekalahoo Lahul Mulko Walahul Hamdo Yuhee Wa Yumeeto Wa Hoa Haiy Yul La Yamooto Abadan Abada Zul Jalali Wal ikraam Beyadihil Khair. Wa hoa Ala Kulli Shai In Qadeer.
 
5) Kalma Astaghfar: Astaghfirullah Rabbi Min Kullay Zambin Aznabtuho Amadan Ao Khat An Sirran Ao Alaniatan Wa Atoobo ilaihe Minaz Zambil Lazee Aalamo Wa Minaz Zambil Lazee La Aalamo innaka Anta Allamul Ghuyoobi Wa Sattaarul Oyobi Wa Ghaffaruz Zunoobi Wala Haola Wala Quwwata illa billahil AliYil Azeem.
 
6) Kalma Radde Kufr: Allah Humma inni Aaoozubika Min An Oshrika Beka Shai Aown Wa Anaa Aalamo Behi Wa Astaghfiroka Lima laa Aalamo Behi Tubtu Anho Wa Tabarrato Minal Kufri Washshirki Wal Kizbi Wal Jheebati Wal Bidaati Wan Nameemati Wal Fawahishi Wal Bohtani Wal Maasi Kulliha Wa Aslamtoo Wa Aamantoo Wa Aqoolo Laa ilaaha illal Lahoo Mohammadur Rasool Ullah.انگریزی میں چھ Kalimas Tajveed
 
1) Kalma طیب: لاالہ illal Lahoo Mohammadur رسول اللہ
 
2) Kalma Shaadat: Ashahado ایک لاالہ illal Laho Wahdahoo لا الہ Shareeka Lahoo و راھ Hado ینا محمڈن Abdo Rasoolohoo و ہو.
 
3) Kalma Tamjeed: Subhanallahe وال Hamdulillahe و لا الہ الہ الا اللہ illal Laho Wallahooakbar. والا Haola والا Quwwata الا billahil AliYil عظیم.
 
4) Kalma Tauheed: لا الہ الہ الا اللہ illal Lahoo Wahdahoo لا الہ Shareekalahoo Lahul Mulko Walahul Hamdo Yuhee و Yumeeto و ہوآ Haiy Yul لا Yamooto آبادان Abada جسے جلالی وال ikraam Beyadihil خیر. قدیر میں ہوآ و اعلی Kulli Shai.
 
5) Kalma Astaghfar: Astaghfirullah ربی من Kullay Zambin Aznabtuho Amadan AO Khat ایک Sirran AO Alaniatan و Atoobo ilaihe Minaz Zambil Lazee Aalamo و Minaz Zambil Lazee لا Aalamo innaka Anta Allamul Ghuyoobi و Sattaarul Oyobi و Ghaffaruz Zunoobi والا Haola والا Quwwata الا billahil AliYil عظیم.
 
6) Kalma Radde کفر: اللہ ہما inni Aaoozubika کم سے کم ایک Oshrika Beka Shai Aown و Anaa Aalamo Behi و Astaghfiroka لیما لا Aalamo Behi Tubtu Anho و Tabarrato Minal Kufri Washshirki وال Kizbi وال Jheebati وال Bidaati وان Nameemati وال Fawahishi وال Bohtani وال Maasi Kulliha و Aslamtoo و Aamantoo و Aqoolo لاالہ illal Lahoo Mohammadur رسول اللہ.
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/nZS8k4


 

 Search Facebook kufr: Six Kalimas in English Tajveed 1) Kalma Tayyab: Laa ilaaha illal Lahoo Mohammadur Rasool Ullah 2) Kalma Shaadat: Ashahado An Laa ilaaha illal Laho Wahdahoo Laa Shareeka Lahoo Wa Ash Hado Anna Mohammadan Abdo Hoo Wa Rasoolohoo. 3) Kalma Tamjeed: Subhanallahe Wal Hamdulillahe Wa Laa ilaha illal Laho Wallahooakbar. Wala Haola Wala Quwwata illa billahil AliYil Azeem. 4) Kalma Tauheed: Laa ilaha illal Lahoo Wahdahoo Laa Shareekalahoo Lahul Mulko Walahul Hamdo Yuhee Wa Yumeeto Wa Hoa Haiy Yul La Yamooto Abadan Abada Zul Jalali Wal ikraam Beyadihil Khair. Wa hoa Ala Kulli Shai In Qadeer. 5) Kalma Astaghfar: Astaghfirullah Rabbi Min Kullay Zambin Aznabtuho Amadan Ao Khat An Sirran Ao Alaniatan Wa Atoobo ilaihe Minaz Zambil Lazee Aalamo Wa Minaz Zambil Lazee La Aalamo innaka Anta Allamul Ghuyoobi Wa Sattaarul Oyobi Wa Ghaffaruz Zunoobi Wala Haola Wala Quwwata illa billahil AliYil Azeem. 6) Kalma Radde Kufr: Allah Humma inni Aaoozubika Min An Oshrika Beka Shai Aown Wa Anaa Aalamo Behi Wa Astaghfiroka Lima laa Aalamo Behi Tubtu Anho Wa Tabarrato Minal Kufri Washshirki Wal Kizbi Wal Jheebati Wal Bidaati Wan Nameemati Wal Fawahishi Wal Bohtani Wal Maasi Kulliha Wa Aslamtoo Wa Aamantoo Wa Aqoolo Laa ilaaha illal Lahoo Mohammadur Rasool Ullah.

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 04:43PM +0100  

Search Facebook kufr
 
Search Facebook kufr
 
Six Kalimas in English Tajveed
 
1) Kalma Tayyab: Laa ilaaha illal Lahoo Mohammadur Rasool Ullah
 
2) Kalma Shaadat: Ashahado An Laa ilaaha illal Laho Wahdahoo Laa Shareeka Lahoo Wa Ash Hado Anna Mohammadan Abdo Hoo Wa Rasoolohoo.
 
3) Kalma Tamjeed: Subhanallahe Wal Hamdulillahe Wa Laa ilaha illal Laho Wallahooakbar. Wala Haola Wala Quwwata illa billahil AliYil Azeem.
 
4) Kalma Tauheed: Laa ilaha illal Lahoo Wahdahoo Laa Shareekalahoo Lahul Mulko Walahul Hamdo Yuhee Wa Yumeeto Wa Hoa Haiy Yul La Yamooto Abadan Abada Zul Jalali Wal ikraam Beyadihil Khair. Wa hoa Ala Kulli Shai In Qadeer.
 
5) Kalma Astaghfar: Astaghfirullah Rabbi Min Kullay Zambin Aznabtuho Amadan Ao Khat An Sirran Ao Alaniatan Wa Atoobo ilaihe Minaz Zambil Lazee Aalamo Wa Minaz Zambil Lazee La Aalamo innaka Anta Allamul Ghuyoobi Wa Sattaarul Oyobi Wa Ghaffaruz Zunoobi Wala Haola Wala Quwwata illa billahil AliYil Azeem.
 
6) Kalma Radde Kufr: Allah Humma inni Aaoozubika Min An Oshrika Beka Shai Aown Wa Anaa Aalamo Behi Wa Astaghfiroka Lima laa Aalamo Behi Tubtu Anho Wa Tabarrato Minal Kufri Washshirki Wal Kizbi Wal Jheebati Wal Bidaati Wan Nameemati Wal Fawahishi Wal Bohtani Wal Maasi Kulliha Wa Aslamtoo Wa Aamantoo Wa Aqoolo Laa ilaaha illal Lahoo Mohammadur Rasool Ullah.
http://graph.facebook.com/166661643513948/picture
Jul 1st 2013, 14:58
 
Six Kalimas in English Tajveed
 
1) Kalma Tayyab: Laa ilaaha illal Lahoo Mohammadur Rasool Ullah
 
2) Kalma Shaadat: Ashahado An Laa ilaaha illal Laho Wahdahoo Laa Shareeka Lahoo Wa Ash Hado Anna Mohammadan Abdo Hoo Wa Rasoolohoo.
 
3) Kalma Tamjeed: Subhanallahe Wal Hamdulillahe Wa Laa ilaha illal Laho Wallahooakbar. Wala Haola Wala Quwwata illa billahil AliYil Azeem.
 
4) Kalma Tauheed: Laa ilaha illal Lahoo Wahdahoo Laa Shareekalahoo Lahul Mulko Walahul Hamdo Yuhee Wa Yumeeto Wa Hoa Haiy Yul La Yamooto Abadan Abada Zul Jalali Wal ikraam Beyadihil Khair. Wa hoa Ala Kulli Shai In Qadeer.
 
5) Kalma Astaghfar: Astaghfirullah Rabbi Min Kullay Zambin Aznabtuho Amadan Ao Khat An Sirran Ao Alaniatan Wa Atoobo ilaihe Minaz Zambil Lazee Aalamo Wa Minaz Zambil Lazee La Aalamo innaka Anta Allamul Ghuyoobi Wa Sattaarul Oyobi Wa Ghaffaruz Zunoobi Wala Haola Wala Quwwata illa billahil AliYil Azeem.
 
6) Kalma Radde Kufr: Allah Humma inni Aaoozubika Min An Oshrika Beka Shai Aown Wa Anaa Aalamo Behi Wa Astaghfiroka Lima laa Aalamo Behi Tubtu Anho Wa Tabarrato Minal Kufri Washshirki Wal Kizbi Wal Jheebati Wal Bidaati Wan Nameemati Wal Fawahishi Wal Bohtani Wal Maasi Kulliha Wa Aslamtoo Wa Aamantoo Wa Aqoolo Laa ilaaha illal Lahoo Mohammadur Rasool Ullah.
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/nZS8k4


 

 Search Facebook kufr: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBEG3t5t6Ns

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 04:43PM +0100  

Search Facebook kufr
 
Search Facebook kufr
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBEG3t5t6Ns
http://graph.facebook.com/100002390844182/picture
Jul 1st 2013, 15:01
 
https://www.facebook.com/U.M.O.SYRIANREVOLUTION
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/nZS8k4


 

 Search Facebook kufr: SHI'ISM? WHO ARE THE SHIA? Shi'isms fundamental basis--the cornerstone of its religion--is its principle of reviling, abusing and rejecting the Sahaabah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). The murderers of Hadhrat Uthmaan (Radiallahu Anhu) realized that their politically and nafsaani inspired movement can never be successful as long as the authority of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam's) Sahaabah is retained. They had, therefore, no alternative other than raising the structure of Shi'ism on the basis of opinion which necessitated the denial of the authority of the Companions of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). They thus propagated the doctrine of the rejection of the Sahaabah with brutal blasphemy, conspiracy, murder,. fraud and fabrication of statements which they shamelessly attributed to Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Their religion is based on the vilification of those whom Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) loved so dearly and whose authority is established, not on the basis of opinion and love, but on the basis of Divine Directive. Without the Sahaabah there can be no Islam, no Quraan, no Sunnah, no Shariah, no Imaan. The Deen of Allah Ta'ala came to us and to all and will continue to travel to the end of time by means of Naql (authoritative and authentic narration), the first link in the chain of narration and transmission joining us with Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) being the noble Sahaabah. But, Shi'ism has broken that very first and vital link with Nabi-e-Kareern. They thus have no Shar'i authority and no Shar'i proof for their beliefs of the nafs. The way they have sought to overcome this hurdle is by their doctrine of fabricating ahadith to substantiate their claims. Nifaaq or hypocrisy is a principle of the Shi'i religion. They technically term such hypocrisy as taqiyah which means the permissibility to conceal one's true beliefs for the sake of any expediency. Thus they attribute even such hypocrisy to Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu). It is the Shi'i belief that although Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) believed that Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma) usurped the Khilafat and deliberately betrayed Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi Wasallam), he nevertheless pledged loyalty to these senior Sahaabah on account of some political expediency. This blatant baatil and blasphemy attributed to Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) exhibits the crookedness of Shi'i mentality. The Shiahs who have gone out of their way to belittle the Sahaabah and to drop them from the pedestal of authority which the Shariah assigns to them can never be the lovers of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) nor can Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) have love for such miscreants of belief. About such hatred for his Sahaabah, Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: "Those who hate the Sahaabah, hate them because (in reality) they hate me." It is a Shi'i contention that the great Sahaabah, especially Hadhrat Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthmaan, etc. (Radiallahu Anhum) did not understand the teachings of Nabi-e-Kareern (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). They further shamelessly and blasphemously assert that these illustrious Khulafa Raashideen are usurpers, frauds, fabricators of ahadith and wholly incompetent in Deeni matters. Indeed, the La'nat of Allah Ta'ala must be on such slanderers as the Shi'i clergy who make such wicked assertions. Inspite of their slander being shocking and despicable in the extreme, it is not surprising, since they are the worst fabricators and frauds peddling their nafsaani opinions in the name of Islam and attributing it to Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). They have accused the Sahaabah of being involved in conspiracies to eliminate Islam and supplant it with the Arab tribal systems of the time of jaahiliyyah. The blasphemous drivel which clutters their books and preachings exhibits their wickedness and detestation for the Islam of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Inspite of the open venom which the Shiahs spit against the Sahaabah, the ignorant supporters of the Shiahs among the Ahle Sunnah expect the Ulama to raise slogans of brotherhood and to fabricate a common basis and a common platform of fraternity with the haters of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam's) Companions. They expect the Ummah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) to unite with those whose very religion is reared on hatred for the Sahaabah. No, that can never come to pass. The enemies of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam's) Sahaabah can never be the friends and the brothers of the Ahle Sunnah. There is no apologetism in our capital for such Ventures. We know of no diplomacy and recognize no expediency for such vile brotherhood. If unity and brotherhood with all and sundry are of such importance, let the supporters of the Shi'i clergy advocate unity and brotherhood with shaitaan and Qaadianism as well. We unequivocally maintain that those (the Shiahs) who claim that Hadhrat Zubair, Talha and Aishah (Radiallahu Anhum) are jahannami (inmates of the fire) are our enemies. In fact, they Themselves are jahannami. Only those standing in line to be condemned to Jahannam can be so shameless as to say that these illustrious Sahaabah among the Ash'arah Mubashsharah and the beloved wife of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) are jahannami. May Allah Ta'ala save us from uttering such kufr. Muslims should now realize that it is haraam to support in any way the Shiahs. Support for Khomeini and the Shi'i clergy is support offered to the enemies of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Shi'ism falls within the purview of the following statements of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam): "My Ummah will be split into 73 sects. Of these, all but one, will be in the Fire." (Tirmizi) What does the intelligence and lmaan of Muslims direct and conclude? Does the Imaan of a Mu'min opine that the Shiahs are in the Naaji (that which will be saved) group or the Sahaabah? Will the Sahaabah be in the one sect which will go to Jannat or in the 72 sects condemned to hell? Will the Shiahs be dispatched to Jannat and Hadhrat Aishah, Zubair, Talha, Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthmaan (Radiallahu Anhum) to Jahannum as the Shi'i clergy asserts? What does your Imaan tell you? Who will be in Jahannum? The beloved wives and Sahabah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) or the Shi'i clergy. KHOMEINI'S DECLARATION "The Islamic and non-Islamic powers of the world will not admit our power till such time that we establish our hold over Makkah and Madinah because these are the centers and citadels of Islam. Hence our domination over these places Is an essential requirement ... when as a conqueror I will enter Makkah and Madinah, the first thing to be done at that time by me would be to dig out two idols (Abu Bakr and Umar) lying by the side of the Prophet's grave." (Ayatullah Khomeini of Iran, while addressing a message for a youth rally). Khomeinism and Islam, page 8 by Abu Rehan Farooqi This statement mirrors the attitude of hatred and contempt which Khomeini and his Shiahs cherish in particular for Ameerul Mu'mineen Sayyidina Abu Bakr and Ameerul Mu'mineen Sayyidina Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma), and about all the Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum) in general. While this is the vile and abominable attitude of Khomeini towards the illustrious Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum) of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), the Qur'an-e-Kareem states the attitude of Imaan in the following words: "Muhammad is the Rasool of Allah, and those who are with him (i. e. the Sahabah) are stern against the kuffar and tender among themselves. You will see them (the Sahabah) in Ruku' and Sajdah searching for the grace of Allah and (His) Pleasure. Their sign is on their faces because of the impression of (abundance of) Sajdah... " (Surah Fath). Most certainly, Allah was well pleased with the Mu'mineen (i.e. the Sahabah) when they took the oath of allegiance to you (0 Muhammad!) under the tree... (Surah Fath) "And the early ones, the first one among the Muhajireen and Ansar and those who follow them (the Muhajireen and Ansar) in virtue, Allah is well pleased with them and they are well pleased with Him. Allah has prepared for them gardens beneath which flow rivers; therein will they dwell forever. Indeed, that is the great victory. " (SurahTaubah) This is what the Qur'an says regarding the Sahabah, but the Shiah priests brand the Muhajireen and Ansar as kafir, murtad and munafiq! Nauthubillah! And, Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said about the Sahabah: "Fear Allah! Fear Allah regarding my Sahabah. Thus, whoever loves them, does so because of my love; whoever hates them, does so because of my hatred." It is thus abundantly clear that Khomeini cherishes a dislike, an aversion, a hatred for the Sahabah because of his hatred for Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). The closer a Sahaabi was to Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), the viler the abuse and the greater the enmity the Shiahs demonstrate for him. The noble Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum) are the foundation and the pivots of Islam. The entire basis and superstructure of Islam have been magnificently raised on the teachings, explanations and expositions of the Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum). The Qur'an Majeed itself has been authentically and authoritatively transmitted to the Ummah down the centuries in the form presented by the illustrious Sahabah - by Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthmaan (Radiallahu Anhum), the prime targets of Shi'i and Khomeini vituperation. An abundance of Shi'i propaganda on the instructions of Khomeini is being churned out by Iran. Such propaganda conducted under hollow and hypocritical slogans such as (There is no Shi'ism and no Sunnism), is designed to mislead the Ummah of Islam into acceptance of the Shi'i religion. Ignorance of what Shi'ism is, has constrained many Muslims to incline towards Khomeini and Shi'ism. But, it shall, Insha Allah, be shown that the vociferous "Islamic" slogans trumpeted by Khomeini and the Shi'i priests are mere outer and superficial facades behind which lurk the darkness of kufr. In fact, the intensity of Khomeini's and Shiah kufr is worse than the kufr of the Qadianis and other baatil sects since the Shi'i religion is reared on hatred for the Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum). Without such hatred, there is no Shi'ism. Hatred for the Sahabah, which is an overt and conspicuous facet of Shi'ism, is a doctrine of fundamental importance in the Shiah religion. It is inconceivable to be a Shiah without subscribing to the doctrine of aversion for and vituperation of the noble Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum) of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). To open the eyes of the Sunni brethren of ours, who have been deceived by Khomeini's propaganda machinery, we shall present here the views of the Shi'i religion - views and statements extracted from the authoritative books of theology of the Shi'i religion. SHI'ISM AND THE SAHABAH The most authentic book of theology of Shi'ism is Al-Jamiul Kafi. In this book in the section, Kitabur Raudha', the following narration is attributed to the fifth Shi', Imam: "After Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) all people became murtads (reneged from Islam) except three persons - Miqdad Bin Aswad, Abu Tharr Ghifari and Salman Farsi Radiallahu Anhum wabarakatuhum). " In the Shi'i book, Kitabur Raudhah, the following narration is attributed to Imam Baqir who allegedly made the statement in reply to his disciple who had sought the Imam's opinion regarding Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma) "What are you asking me about them (Abu Bakr and Umar)? Whoever among us (i.e. the Ahle Bait or the progeny of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) departed from this world, departed in a state of extreme displeasure with them. The elders among us admonished the younger ones to perpetuate it (i.e. this displeasure with Abu Bakr and Umar), Verily, the two of them have unjustly usurped our right. By Allah! These two were the first to settle on our necks (i.e. the necks of the Ahle Bait). Therefore, may the la'nat (curse) of Allah, the Malaikah and of mankind be on the two of them. (Kitabur Raudhah, Page 115) In the same book, on the same page appears the following: "Verily. these two elders (Abu Bakr and Umar) departed from this world without having made taubah for what they had perpetrated against Ameerul Mumineen Alayhis Salaam. In fact, they did not even think of us (of their wrongs against Hadhrat Ali). Therefore, the la'nat of Allah, the Malaikah and of mankind be on them." In the Shiah book, Rijal Kashi, Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma) are denigrated in the following narration attributed to Imam Baqir: "Whatever murder is committed in Islam, whatever unlawful wealth is earned and whatever adultery is committed until the appearance of our Imam Mahdi - the sin of all this is on the necks of the two (i.e. Abu Bakr and Umar). (Rijal Kashi, page 135) In Kitabur Raudhah on pages 159/160, the Shiahs attribute a narration to Hadhrat Salman Farsi (Radiallahu Anhu) in which it is claimed that on the occasion when the oath of allegiance was given to Hadhrat Abu Bakr (Radiallahu Anhu), the first person to swear allegiance to him was an old man who stepped forward crying: "All praise to Allah who has not caused me to die yet, enabling me to see you on this pedestal. Stretch your hand. " Thus he (Abu Bakr) stretched his hand and the old man took the oath of allegiance (at his hand)." According to the narration, when Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) heard this from Hadhrat Salman (Radiallahu Anhu), he asked: "Do you know who he (the old man who took the oath of allegiance) is?" When Salman (Radiallahu Anhu) replied in the negative, Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) allegedly said: "That was Iblees, Allah has cursed him." Thus, according to Shi'ism, the first being who accepted the Khilafat of Hadhrat Abu Bakr (Radiallahu Anhu) was Iblees who placed his hand in the hand of Hadhrat Abu Bakr (Radiallahu Anhu). At the end of this narration in Kitabur Raudhah, the following words are attributed by the Shi'i priests to Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). "Then, they (a group of the Saqeefah Bani Saidah) will come to the Musjid (i.e. Musjid-e-Nabawi) and the first to swear allegiance to him (i.e. Abu Bakr) on my Mimbar will be Iblees, the La'nat of Allah on him. Iblees will appear (on that occasion) in the form of an old man and say so (i.e. what Salman Faarsi has allegedly said)." Mullah Baqir Majlisi is a renowned personality in Shiah circles. He is regarded as a top-ranking Muhaddith. He flourished in the 10th century of the Hijri era. The Shi'i clergy has accorded him the title, Khatamul Muhadditheen (the seal of the Muhadditheen). His works are regarded as highly authoritative by the Shiah priests. Khomeini has praised and recommended his writings. This Shi'i priest, in his books, writes the following statements whenever he mentions the name of Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) "Umar Bin Khattab - on him be la'nat (curse) and athab (punishment). This, then is the Shi'i attitude towards the beloved Sahabah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). This Mullah Baqir Majlisi has mentioned in his book, Zadul Ma'ad, numerous virtues and excellencies of the 9th of Rabiul Awwal. According to Baqir Majlisi, the significance and excellence of 9th Rabiul Awwal are because "Umar, the enemy of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the enemy of the Ahle Bait" will be killed on the 9th Rabiul Awwal. It is for this reason that the 9th of Rabiul Awwal should be observed as a great occasion of happiness and festivity according to Shi'ism. The relevant part of this fabricated narration attributed by the Shiah to the famous Sahaabi, Hadhrat Huzaifah (Radiallahu Anhu) is as follows: "Huziifah Bin Yaman narrates: Once on the 9th of Rabiul Awwal I went to Rasulullah. I saw Ameerul Mu'mineen Ali Murtaza, Imam Hasan and Imam Husain also there. All were busy eating. Rasulullah smiling in great happiness said to Hasan and Husain: 'Sons, today is the day on which Allah will destroy your enemy and the enemy of your grandfather, and Allah will accept the curse of your mother (Fatimah). Eat sons, eat I Today is the day that Allah accepts the deeds of your Shiah (partisans), and beloved. Eat sons, eat! Today is the day when the power of your enemy and the enemy of your grandfather will be broken and annihilated in the dust. Eat sons, eat! Today is the day when Fir'on to my Ahle Bait, the one who will oppress and persecute them and who will usurp their rights, will be destroyed." Huzaifah said: I exclaimed: 'O Rasulullah! Will there be such an evil person in your Ummah, who will perpetrate such villainy?' Rasulullah replied: 'O Huzaifah! Among the munafiqs (hypocrites) there will be one idol who will be the leader of the group of munafiqeen. He will carry in his hand the whip of cruelty and injustice; he will prevent people from the Path of truth; he will alter the Qur'an; he will change my Sunnah and my ways; he will oppress my Wasi (Appointee), Ali Bin Abi Talib and he will deprive my daughter, Fatimah of her rights. My daughter will then curse him. Allah Ta'ala will accept her la'nat (curse) and prayers.' Huzaifah then said: 'O Rasulullah! Why do you not supplicate to Allah to destroy this Fir'on and oppressor in your very lifetime?' Rasulullah replied: 'O Huzaifah! I do not regard it proper to interfere in the decisions of Allah Ta'ala... But, I have requested Allah Ta'ala to grant excellence and superiority to that day when that oppressor and Fir'on is dispatched to Jahannum (e.i. when he is destroyed). That day should be decreed superior to all other days so that honoring of that day becomes a Sunnah for my Shiane Ahle Bait (i.e. partisans of my family). Allah Ta'ala then sent this Wahi (revelation): 'It has already been decreed in My Eternal Knowledge that the usurping Munafiqs will persecute you and your family. They will inflict many hardships on you and your family. O Muhammad! Ali has been awarded your rank because of these (impending) hardships which will be perpetrated on him by the usurper of his rights and the Fir'on of this Ummah. I have commanded the angels of the seven heavens to rejoice and celebrate Eid on the day he (i.e. Hadhrat Umar) is killed - this is for the sake of the partisans and lovers of the Ahle Bait. I have commanded the recording Angels to cease recording the sins of My servants for three days from that day. This is in honor of that day (on which Hadhrat Umar will be murdered). O Muhammad! Three days grace and permission in general to commit sins have been given in your honor and in honor of your appointee (Ali) ... Every year on this day, will I free from Jahannam thousands of your Shiahs.' Huzaifah says: 'After Rasulullah said this, he arose and left the room and went to the house of Umme Salmah. After having heard this talk of Rasulullah I was convinced of Umar's kufr. There remained no doubt in this. Finally, after the demise of Rasulullah, I witnessed the fitnah which he (Umar) created. He exhibited the kufr which was concealed in him. He reneged from Islam and usurped the Imamate and Khilafate. To achieve this end he adopted the most shameless methods. He altered the Qur'an and burnt the holy house of Rasulullah. He pleased the Jews, Christians and the Magians and displeased Fatimah and the entire Ahle Bait, and he conspired to have Ameerul Mu'meen (i.e. Hadhrat Ali) murdered. He made haram what Allah had made halal and legalized what Allah had made unlawful. He slammed the door against the face and stomach of Fatimah Alayhis Salaam. Huzaifah then said: 'Finally Allah Ta'ala accepted the curses of His Holy Nabi and his daughter in regard to this Munafiq (i.e. Hadhrat Umar) and had him killed at the hands, of his killer (Abu Lu'lu' Irani). May there be the Rahmat (Mercy) of Allah on his (Umar's) killer." (Zadul Ma'ad - Pages 433-436) Needless to say, this whole narration, from beginning to end, is a colossal fabrication of the Shiah enemies of the Sahabah in general, and of the first three Khulafa (Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthmaan) in particular. Shi'i priests are notorious for the fabrication of narration's which they impute to such great men of Islam, whom they describe as their "Imaams", when in actual fact, they (the so-called Imaams of the Shiahs) were august personalities of the Ahl-e- Sunnah wal Jam'at. The salient features of batil stated in the aforementioned fabrication are: 1. Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu), the second Khalifah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) was a kafir. 2. Not only was Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) a kafir, but a munafiq. 3. Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) was the leader of the Munafiqeen (hypocrites). 4. Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Ahle Bait had cursed Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu). 5. Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had prayed for the murder of Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu). 6. Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) had altered and interpolated the Qur'an Shareef. 7. Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) was a cruel oppressor, unjust and a usurper. 8. Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) prevented others from Imaan and Islam. 9. Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) conspired to murder Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu). 10. The day on which Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu), was murdered by the Persian kafir, Lu'lu', is the most auspicious day of the year. 11. The Rahmat of Allah is on the Kafir murderer of Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu). 12. The day when Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) was killed is such an occasion of rejoicing that Allah Ta'ala declared the permissibility of sinning for three consecutive days. That is, each year for three days from the date of Umar's murder, Shiahs are permitted to fornicate, consume alcohol, steal and commit all sins and crimes with complete equanimity since sins are not recorded in these three days. These are the abominable teachings of Shi'ism regarding the illustrious Ameerul Mu'mineen. Hadhrat Umar Ibn Khattab (Radiallahu Anhu) about whom Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: "If there had to be a Nabi after me, it would have been Umar. "The sternest in the Law of Allah is Umar. " Nahjul Balaaghah, the highest theological book of the Shiahs have this to say about Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma). "Boldly and unscrupulously he (i.e. Hadhrat Abu Bakr) and his successor (i.e. Hadhrat Umar), each in turn, pillaged and plundered the wealth of the community leaving the state in such sadly injured condition that the passage of time was increasing the intensity of the injury,.. But, it was carried on under the guise of law and order and many unacceptable excuses were offered to justify these irreligious and ungodly arrogation's and many more will be repeated in the future. " The Shi'i priest Muhammad Baqir Sadr writes about the Sahabah in general and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) in particular: "... we find that it is necessary to accept the existence of a large trend, from the very lifetime of the Prophet, who inclined towards proposing the use of Ijtihad and circumstantial considerations in determining their interests, above strict adherence to the religious texts. " "This trend was represented by a daring group of important Companions like, Umar bin-al-Khattab, who disputed with the Messenger and made judgements contradicting the text in many subjects, believing that he had the right to do so." The type of 'Ijtihad' which the Shiahs attribute to Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu), in particular, and to other Sahaabah, in general, is described in the following statement of Baqir Sadr: "...we mean by 'ijtihad' the making of judgements in contradiction to the text or acceptance of such a judgement." A king who pillages and plunders the wealth of a nation is supposed to lead a life of luxury-living in palatial mansions and palaces; relaxing in gardens and orchards; adorning himself in garments of silk, velvet and brocade; indulging in sumptuous feasts and extravagance. But history bears loud testimony to the austere, simple, in fact, life of extreme poverty led by our Ameerul Mu'mineen, Sayyidina Umar Farooq (Radiallahu Anhu). A dozen patches adorned his kurtah of coarse cloth. The frugality and austerity of Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) have already attained proverbial significance. The most ardent Sunni sympathizer of Khomeini will not fail in acknowledging this glaring historical fact. Yet the Shi'i priests accuse a Saint of such high, faultless and sterling attributes of having pillaged and plundered the wealth of the Ummah! HaqquI Yaqeen is another very highly placed book of Shi'i theology. The author of Haqqul Yaqeen is the same Mullah Baqir Majlisi, author of Zadul Ma'ad from which the lengthy fabricated narration (mentioned earlier) has been cited. In his book HaqquI Yaqeen, Baqi Majlisi cites a very lengthy narration in which Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma) are subjected to extreme vilification. Some excerpts from this fabricated narration of vilification are reproduced here. "After Makkah Muazzamah, Imam Mehdi will proceed to Madinah, the city of our grandfather, Rasulullah. At Madinah, he (Imam Mehdi) will demonstrate an astonishing act which will be a cause of great happiness for the Mu'mineen and a cause of disgrace for the kuffar and munafiqeen ... When Imam Mehdi will reach the grave of Rasulullah, he will ask the people: "0 people! Is this the grave of our grandfather, Rasulullah?" The people will say - "Yes, this is his grave." Imam Mehdi will then ask:" "Who are these persons who have been buried alongside our grandfather!" The people will say: "They are Abu Bakr and Umar, the closest companions of Rasulullah I" Imam Mehdi (inspite of knowing everything) will say: "Who was Abu Bakr? And, who was Umar? What was their excellence which necessitated their burial alongside our grandfather?"... "After three days, Sahibul Amr (the Shi'i title for Imam Mehdi) will order the walls to be broken and their bodies exhumed .. After the exhumation of their bodies, he will order their kafan to be removed and their bodies will be hung up on a dried out tree... " Imam Mehdi will command a dark storm to destroy those who loved them (i.e. Abu Bakr and Umar). Imam Mehdi will then order that the bodies be taken down from the tree. With the power of Allah, Imam Mehdi will restore them to life. He will order all mankind to gather. Then these two will be held liable for the sin of all oppression and kufr which occurred from the beginning of the world. They will be held responsible for all such sin ..... The sin of every murder committed, of every act of adultery committed, of every act of riba, of every act of haram wealth and injustice perpetrated until the advent of Imam Mehdi's appearance, will be charged against them (Abu Bakr and, Umar). Both of them will plead guilty to all these crimes ... Sahibul Amr will then command that they be hanged on a tree. He will command a fire to rise from the earth and devour them. A fire will (miraculously) rise and reduce them (Abu Bakr and Umar) and the tree to ashes.. " "Muhammad Rasulullah, Ameerul Mumineen (i.e. Hadhrat Ali), Fatimah Zahra, Hasan Mujtaba, Husain Shaheed, and all the sinless Imaams will come to life. All Mumins and all kafirs will also come to life. " "... The two (Abu Bakr and Umar) will then be punished so much, that daily, in one day and one night, they will be killed and restored to life a thousand times. After this, Allah will take them away to wherever He desires and continue punishing them as long as He desires. " This, then are Khomeini's beliefs and attitude in regard to the two highest Companions of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). This is the official teaching of the Shiah religion. In his book Kashful Asrar on page 121, Khomeini advises his Shiah brethren to study the books of Mullah Baqir Majlisi who has presented these repugnant fabrications regarding the Sahaabah-e-Kiram (Radiallahu Anhum). SHI'ISM AND THE NOBLE MOTHERS OF THE UMMAH Allah Ta'ala says in the Qur'an: "The Nabi has a greater claim on the Believers than their ownselves. And, his wives are their mothers." Thus, an article of our Imaan is honor, respect and love for Umaahatul Mu'mineen, the holy Mothers of the Believers, Viz., the honorable wives of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Whoever denigrates them and brands them as unbelievers, is himself/herself a kafir. Among the honorable wives of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), Hadhrat Aishah (Radiallahu Anha) and Hadhrat Hafsah (Radiallahu Anha) are special targets for Shi'i abuse, slander and vilification. This is because they are the daughters of Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma) respectively. The same degree of hatred cherished by Shiahs for Shaikhain (i.e. Abu Bakr and Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma) is gorged out against Hadhrat Aishah and Hadhrat Hafsah (Radiallahu Anhuma). Shi'i narration's shamelessly describe these illustrious and noble wives of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) as kafir, Munafiq, etc. The worst of slanders and calumnies are leveled against them. Mullah Baqir Majlisi, in his book, Hayatul Quloob - one of the most authoritative books of the Shiah religion - repeatedly described Hadhrat Aishah and Hadhrat Hafsah (Radiallahu Anhuma) as munafiqs (hypocrites). In this book, Baqir also alleges: "Aishah and Hafsah martyred Rasulullah by giving him poison. (Vol. 2, Page 870) Accusing Shaikhain and their daughters of conspiracy to murder Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), the Shi'i, Baqir writes in Hayatul Quloob on page 745 of Vol. 2: "Thus these two male munafiqs (referring to Abu Bakr and Umar) and those two female munafiqs (referring to Aishah and Hafsah) agreed to martyr Rasulullah by administering poison to him. " Mutahhiri, a leading cleric of the Shiah religion, says: "Now that we see Ali, and Ammaar, Uways al-Qarani and others face to face with Aishah and az-Zubayr and Talhah, we do not feel any hesitation, for we see the second group as people with the look of criminals, that is, the effects of evil and treachery are evident on their faces: and when we look at their faces and their treacherous characters we guess that they are people of the Fire. " (TEHRAN TIMES, 25th August, 1982) From the above vile remarks made by one of Khomeini's leading Shi'i theologians, it will be evident that the Shiah religion describes Hadhrat Aishah Siddiqah (Radiallahu Anha) the beloved wife of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) as a criminal, evil, treacherous and among the people of Jahannum--Naauthubillaah! But, Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) warned: "Do not hurt me regarding Aishah." (Bukhari-Muslim) "The superiority of Aishah over women is like the superiority of thareed (a kind of food) over all food." (Muslim) "0 Aishah! Jibraeel recites Salaam upon you." (Muslim) In the Shiah religion, Hadhrat Zubair (Radiallahu Anhu) is described as a criminal, evil, treacherous and among the people of Jahannum-Nauthubillah! But, Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said about Zubair: "Every Nabi had a hawaari (helper) and my hawaari is Zubair." "Zubair will be in Jannat." (Tirmizi) Hadhrat Zubair and Hadhrat Talhah whom the Shiahs claim are among the "people of the Fire", are in fact members of the Ashrah Mubashsharah who are the ten Sahaabah unto whom Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) delivered the glad tidings of Jannat. These Sahabah already were informed by Nabi-e- Kareem (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) that their place in Jannat has already been secured, but Khomeini and his Shiahs believe that these noble men are among the people of the Fire. The Shiahs believe that Hadhrat Talhah (Radiallahu Anhu) is evil, treacherous, a criminal and among the people of the Fire, but Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: "Talhah and Zubair will be my two neighbors in Jannat." (Tirmizi) The Qur'an Shareef speaks glowingly regarding the Sahabah. In one place, the Qur'an praises the Sahabah in the following terms: But, Shi'ism preaches that all these Muhajireen and Ansar among the Sahabah, in fact all the Sahabah with the exception of three, reneged from Islam, i.e. they became murtads and kafirs after the demise of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Thus, the "Asah-hul Kutub" The Most Authentic "of Books" of the Shiah religion, Al-Jamiul Kafi, states in its chapter, Kitabur Raudhah on page 115: "After (the demise of) Nabi-(sallallahu alayhi wasallam) - all the people (i.e. the Sahabah) became murtads, excepting three. - Miqdad Bin Aswad, Abu Zar Ghifari and Salman Farsi, the Rahmat and Barkat of Allah be on them." KHOMEINI'S VIEW OF THE SAHABAH In his book, Kashful Asrar, on page 115 Khomeini accuses Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma) of having opposed the clear texts of the Qur'an. Thus he says: "We shall present a few examples of Abu Bakr and Umar having opposed the explicit laws of the Quran and deciding against it. The general body of the Muslims accept their decisions (which were in conflict with the Quran). " On page 119 of his book, Khomeini openly brands Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) as a kafir and zindeeq. Khomeini states: "From the examples of Abu Bakr's and Umar's opposition to the Qur'an, cited by us, it is clear that contradicting the Quran publicly and adopting actions in violation of the Quran were not regarded as a serious matter by these two. The Muslims of that time (viz. the Sahabah) either joined their (Abu Bakr's and Umar's) party in the quest for Political leadership which was their goal, or if they did not join their Party because of not fully supporting them, they never said a word in opposition to those unjust oppressors and powerful munafiqs (referring to Hadhrat's Abu Bakr and Umar). They lacked the courage for this... Abu Bakr who had plotted the whole conspiracy would have fabricated a hadith in contradiction to the Quran just as he had done for depriving Hadhrat Fatimah of her share of inheritance in the estate of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). And Umar - it is entirely to be expected that he would have said that either Allah Himself erred in revealing this ayat or Jibraeel or Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) erred in its delivery. At that time Sunnis would also have supported him and would have aided him in opposition to the command of Allah ... just as is their attitude in all these alterations which Umar effected in the Deen of Islam and its teachings. In all these (alterations of Umar) the Sunnis accorded priority to the statements of Umar in opposition to Qur'anic ayat and statements of the Rasool of Allah and that is exactly what they (Sunnis) are following. " These are the claims and allegations of Khomeini who vociferously and deceitfully, raises the slogan: "There is no Sunni'sm and no Shi'ism." In the above "tract from his book, Kashful Asrar, it is abundantly clear that Khomeini is echoing the following Shi'i beliefs: *That Hadhrat Abu Bakr, Umar and the entire body of the Sahabah were murtads and munafiqs. * That Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Umar interpolated in the Qur'an, changing and deleting to suit their whims and desires. They fabricated and forged ahadith in conflict with the Qur'an. The logical conclusion emanating from these Shiah beliefs is that the Qur'an which we have with us today is not authentic since it was the compilation of these very Sahabah who are regarded as munafiqs by Shi'ism. Besides this fact stemming as the logical conclusion from Shiah beliefs, the highest books of the Shiah religion categorically assert the falsity of the present Qur'an. Insha'Allah, this claim will be described later. Abu Hurairah (Radiallahu Anhu) is a famous name. This illustrious Sahaabi of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) is well-known for his copious narration of ahadith. Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) made special dua for Hadhrat Abu Hurairah (Radiallahu Anhu), but Khomeini has the following to say about this eminent Sahaabi and Muhaddith: "God knows what Misfortunes Islam has Suffered from its inception down to the present at the hands of these evil 'ulama'. Abu Hurairah was one of the fuqaha, but Allah knows what judgments he falsified for Muaawiya and others like him, and what damage he inflicted upon Islam - But when a faqih like Abu Hurairah or a judge like Shurayh joins such a government, he improves its standing while besmirching the reputation of Islam." Commenting on this statement of Khomeini, Hamid Algar the compiler of Khomeini's writings and declarations, states: "Shi'i scholars have regarded him as unreliable and even dishonest." But, Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) made special dua for Abu Hurairah in respect of narration of ahadith, hence we observe the ahadith in abundance narrated by him. The following statement bears out the love which Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had for Hadhrat Abu Hurairah (Radiallahu Anhu). "O Allah! Endear this, your servant (Abu Hurairah) and his mother to your believing servants and endear the believers to them." (Muslim) Thus those who are Believers love Abu Hurairah (Radiallahu Anhu). Those who are unbelievers detest Hadhrat Abu Hurairah (Radiallahu Anhu). Khomeini, slandering the eminent Sahaabi, Hadhrat Samura Bin Jundub (Radiallahu Anhu) says: "Dissemination of the ordinances of Islam, as well as the teaching and instruction of the people, is the duty of the fuqaha who are just. For if they are not just, they will be like those who forged traditions harmful to Islam, like Samura ibn Jandab, who forged traditions hostile to the Commander of the Faithful." SHI'I LIES, SLANDER AND ABUSE Nahjul Balaaghah, one of the highest books of Shiah theology has the following abuse and vituperation for the Khulafa-e-Raashideen and the illustrious Sahaabah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam); this scurrilous attack and abuse is ascribed by the Shiahs to Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu).: "At last the first Caliph died, but while going, he appointed another to fill his vacancy. It is not astonishing that during his lifetime he was always badly in need of the help Of Others to compensate for his imperfections and defects and to cover his faults and failures, but at the time of his death he thought himself to be wise and learned enough to fix and appoint somebody to carry on the duties at which he was a complete failure himself." "Boldly and unscrupulously he and his successor (a reference to Hadhrat Umar), each in turn, pillaged and plundered the wealth of the community leaving the state in such sadly injured condition that the passage of time was increasing the intensity of the injury ... But it was carried on under the guise of law and order and many unacceptable excuses were offered to justify these irreligious and ungodly arrogation's and many more will be repeated in the future." "Consequently the third (i.e. Hadhrat Uthmaan) proudly took charge of the caliphate, as if it was a private grazing ground, and with bloated stomachs he and members of his clan (Bani Umayya) started plundering the wealth of the Muslim world in the same reckless gluttonous manner which characterizes a camel when it devours harvest grass. However, this man met an untimely death. The greed of his clan was the cause of his undoing. " (Nahjul Balaaghah) Another lie which the Shiahs attribute to Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) is the following statement: "You know very well that Amr-ibn-Aas himself is an inveterate liar, he usually lies, he makes promises without intention of fulfilling them ... He habitually breaks his pledges, never keeps a promise and is unkind and unmerciful In the battlefield before the swords are drawn and fight begins, he is usually very bold in giving orders and very conspicuous in pretension of leading the army; but when the fight actually begins, his greatest tactic is to show his opponents his naked buttocks. " (Nahjul Balaaghah) Ameerul Mu'mineen Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) never uttered such falsehood, slander, abuse, insult and vulgarity. Such abuse and vituperation are the stock weapons of Shi'ism. Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) had the utmost respect and honor for Hadhrat Abu Bakr, Hadhrat Umar and Hadhrat Uthmaan (Radiallahu Anhum). In fact, Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) took the oath of allegiance (ba'yt) on the hands of the first three Khulafa Raashideen. Furthermore, Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) could never have spoken so disparagingly of the great Conqueror of Islam, viz., Hadhrat Amr Ibn Aas (Radiallahu Anhu) who was among the top-ranking Companions of Nabi-e- Kareern (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). No Mu'min and no person of any Imaani intelligence can ever accept that Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) was capable of uttering such profanity as the Shiah ascribe to him. Moreover, the absurdity of attributing this torrent of abuse to Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) becomes more glaring by the fact that Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) gave his eldest daughter, Umme Kulthoom (Radiallahu Anha) in marriage to Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu). Umme Kulthum (Radiallahu Anha) was the eldest daughter of Hadhrat Fatimah (Radiallahu Anha). This act of Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) completely confuses the Shiahs and entirely repudiates the Shiah doctrine of hatred for the Sahabah in general and for Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) in particular. Shiah priests are at pains and to this day remain in the grip of mental labor pains attempting to explain away and misinterpret this act of Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu). Shiahs, unanimously regard Hadhrat Ali as the first and highest of their Imaams. Some regard him even as God. The main branch of Shi'ism, viz. the Ithna Ashris to which Khomeini belongs, claims Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) to be on the same rank as Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) as well as being higher than even other Ambiya A.S. Thus, Khomeini states: "It is one of the essential beliefs of our Shi'i school that no one can attain the spiritual status of the lmaam, not even the cherubim or the prophets. " (Writings and Declarations of Khomeini) The Shiah book, Usool-e-Kafi states: "The laws brought by Ali ... His rank is like the rank of Muhammad." This being the Shi'i belief regarding Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu), they have been thrown into total disarray and confusion by the marriage of Hadhrat Ali's daughter to Hadhrat Umar. In struggling to explain away this indictment against Shi'ism, the Shiah priests resort to a variety of Taqiyah Tricks. But, far from satisfactorily explaining this truth, they only succeed in compounding their confusion and exhibiting their mental absurdity. How was it possible for Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) to have consented to his daughter marrying Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) whom Shi'ism unanimously brands as a munafiq, kafir, murtad, murderer, oppressor and a multitude of other vile epithets? Indeed, this holy marriage is perpetually dangling on the necks of the Shiah priests like a dead albatross which they are unable to shed off - with which they have to live and be haunted. Among the most ludicrous explanations fabricated by the Shiahs to argue away this historical fact, Rawindi the ' Qutubul Aqtab' of the Shiahs claims that when Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) pressurized and threatened Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) to consent to this marriage with Umme Kulthum, he (Ali) miraculously transformed a female Jinn into the form, and appearance of Kulthum. Thus, Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) married this female Jinn while the real Umme Kulthum remained in concealment. Only plunderers of Imaan could fabricate such nonsensical absurdity. This alleged miraculous transformation of the female Jinn is described in detail in the Shiah book, Mawaiz-e-Husainiyah. Regarding this marriage, Abu Ja'far Yaqub Kaleeni, claims in his book Furoo'Kafi (an authoritative book of the Shiahs) that Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) did not marry Umme Kulthum, but abducted her by force. According to these miserable Shiah slanderers, Hadhrat Umar captured her by force and fornicated with her (Nauthubillah!) and kept her in captivity against her wishes and without having performed nikah with her. Thus, then, is the reasoning of minds impregnated with kufr. The Shiah mujtahid, Muhammad Hussain Dakkoo states in his book, Tajalliat- e-Sadaqat: "While the Sunnis consider them Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthman) to be the noblest after Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) we (Shiahs) firmly believe that they were bereft of the wealth of Imaan and Ikhlas. (Page 201) "..... the three Khalifs (Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthman) in his (Ali's) estimation were sinners, liars, treacherous, cheats, oppressors and usurpers... " (Page 206) "The conquests during the reign of the first three Khalifs sullied the "The conquests during the reign of the first three Khalifs sullied the name of Islam." (Page 95) "We do not deny the first part of the Sunni claim that Aishah (Radiallahu Anha) being the wife of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) is the mother of the Muslims. But we do not hold the view that she was a believer. To be a mother is one thing and to be a Mu'minah (Believer) is another thing. " (Page 478) Every Muslim knows that Hadhrat Khalid Bin Walid (Radiallahu Anhu) has been given the title, Saifullah (the Sword of Allah) by Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). But, the Shiah priests offer the following vituperation: "Tyrant Khalid beheaded Malik and two leaders of his tribe. Their heads were put in the oven in which food was cooked for the feast of Walimah. In this way, the Walimah of zina (adultery) was prepared and Khalid himself ate therefrom and served it to his soldiers as well. " (Page 100, the Shiah book by Hussain Buksh Jara, Munazarah Baghdad). The Shiah priest Ghulam Husain Najfi wrote in his book, Fi Jawab: Nikah Umme Kulthoom: "Umar did not believe in the Quran. (Page 429) "Umar continued to consume liquor even after it was declared unlawful. The last thing which he consumed before his death was liquor." (Page430) "Umar is the lock of Jahannum." (Page 430) Those are just a few statements cited from the book of this immoral and bestial Shi'i unbeliever. There are many other statements of extreme filth which these Shi'i hoodlum priests gorge out against Hadhrat Umar and Uthman (Radiallahu Anhu). But we feel too ashamed to record and too difficult to write the filthy words of vulgarity and immorality which the priests of Shi'ism so shamelessly and mercilessly direct against the most illustrious Sahabah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). The filthiest charges of moral debasement are hurled at Ameerul Mu'mineen Hadhrat Uthman about whom Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) spoke so glowingly. His modesty and shame were of such a lofty degree that, according to Rasulullah ( sallallahu alayhi wasallam), even the Malaikah felt shy for him. It is only Shi'i renegades and unbelievers who possess sufficient audacity and shamelessness to besmirch such a paragon of virtue and modesty with the vilest charges of immorality and moral debasement. May Allah Ta'ala eliminate these vile priests of blasphemy, slander, scandal and kufr.

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 04:43PM +0100  

Search Facebook kufr
 
Search Facebook kufr
 
SHI'ISM?
 
WHO ARE THE SHIA?
 
Shi'isms fundamental basis--the cornerstone of its religion--is its principle of reviling, abusing and rejecting the Sahaabah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). The murderers of Hadhrat Uthmaan (Radiallahu Anhu) realized that their politically and nafsaani inspired movement can never be successful as long as the authority of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam's) Sahaabah is retained. They had, therefore, no alternative other than raising the structure of Shi'ism on the basis of opinion which necessitated the denial of the authority of the Companions of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). They thus propagated the doctrine of the rejection of the Sahaabah with brutal blasphemy, conspiracy, murder,. fraud and fabrication of statements which they shamelessly attributed to Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Their religion is based on the vilification of those whom Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) loved so dearly and whose authority is established, not on the basis of opinion and love, but on the basis of Divine Directive. Without the Sahaabah there can be no Islam, no Quraan, no Sunnah, no Shariah, no Imaan. The Deen of Allah Ta'ala came to us and to all and will continue to travel to the end of time by means of Naql (authoritative and authentic narration), the first link in the chain of narration and transmission joining us with Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) being the noble Sahaabah. But, Shi'ism has broken that very first and vital link with Nabi-e-Kareern. They thus have no Shar'i authority and no Shar'i proof for their beliefs of the nafs. The way they have sought to overcome this hurdle is by their doctrine of fabricating ahadith to substantiate their claims.
 
Nifaaq or hypocrisy is a principle of the Shi'i religion. They technically term such hypocrisy as taqiyah which means the permissibility to conceal one's true beliefs for the sake of any expediency. Thus they attribute even such hypocrisy to Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu). It is the Shi'i belief that although Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) believed that Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma) usurped the Khilafat and deliberately betrayed Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi Wasallam), he nevertheless pledged loyalty to these senior Sahaabah on account of some political expediency. This blatant baatil and blasphemy attributed to Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) exhibits the crookedness of Shi'i mentality.
 
The Shiahs who have gone out of their way to belittle the Sahaabah and to drop them from the pedestal of authority which the Shariah assigns to them can never be the lovers of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) nor can Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) have love for such miscreants of belief. About such hatred for his Sahaabah, Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:
 
"Those who hate the Sahaabah, hate them because (in reality) they hate me."
 
It is a Shi'i contention that the great Sahaabah, especially Hadhrat Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthmaan, etc. (Radiallahu Anhum) did not understand the teachings of Nabi-e-Kareern (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). They further shamelessly and blasphemously assert that these illustrious Khulafa Raashideen are usurpers, frauds, fabricators of ahadith and wholly incompetent in Deeni matters. Indeed, the La'nat of Allah Ta'ala must be on such slanderers as the Shi'i clergy who make such wicked assertions. Inspite of their slander being shocking and despicable in the extreme, it is not surprising, since they are the worst fabricators and frauds peddling their nafsaani opinions in the name of Islam and attributing it to Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). They have accused the Sahaabah of being involved in conspiracies to eliminate Islam and supplant it with the Arab tribal systems of the time of jaahiliyyah. The blasphemous drivel which clutters their books and preachings exhibits their wickedness and detestation for the Islam of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam).
 
Inspite of the open venom which the Shiahs spit against the Sahaabah, the ignorant supporters of the Shiahs among the Ahle Sunnah expect the Ulama to raise slogans of brotherhood and to fabricate a common basis and a common platform of fraternity with the haters of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam's) Companions. They expect the Ummah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) to unite with those whose very religion is reared on hatred for the Sahaabah. No, that can never come to pass. The enemies of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam's) Sahaabah can never be the friends and the brothers of the Ahle Sunnah. There is no apologetism in our capital for such Ventures. We know of no diplomacy and recognize no expediency for such vile brotherhood. If unity and brotherhood with all and sundry are of such importance, let the supporters of the Shi'i clergy advocate unity and brotherhood with shaitaan and Qaadianism as well.
 
We unequivocally maintain that those (the Shiahs) who claim that Hadhrat Zubair, Talha and Aishah (Radiallahu Anhum) are jahannami (inmates of the fire) are our enemies. In fact, they Themselves are jahannami. Only those standing in line to be condemned to Jahannam can be so shameless as to say that these illustrious Sahaabah among the Ash'arah Mubashsharah and the beloved wife of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) are jahannami. May Allah Ta'ala save us from uttering such kufr.
 
Muslims should now realize that it is haraam to support in any way the Shiahs. Support for Khomeini and the Shi'i clergy is support offered to the enemies of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Shi'ism falls within the purview of the following statements of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam):
 
"My Ummah will be split into 73 sects. Of these, all but one, will be in the Fire." (Tirmizi)
 
What does the intelligence and lmaan of Muslims direct and conclude? Does the Imaan of a Mu'min opine that the Shiahs are in the Naaji (that which will be saved) group or the Sahaabah? Will the Sahaabah be in the one sect which will go to Jannat or in the 72 sects condemned to hell? Will the Shiahs be dispatched to Jannat and Hadhrat Aishah, Zubair, Talha, Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthmaan (Radiallahu Anhum) to Jahannum as the Shi'i clergy asserts? What does your Imaan tell you? Who will be in Jahannum? The beloved wives and Sahabah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) or the Shi'i clergy.
 
KHOMEINI'S DECLARATION
 
"The Islamic and non-Islamic powers of the world will not admit our power till such time that we establish our hold over Makkah and Madinah because these are the centers and citadels of Islam. Hence our domination over these places Is an essential requirement ... when as a conqueror I will enter Makkah and Madinah, the first thing to be done at that time by me would be to dig out two idols (Abu Bakr and Umar) lying by the side of the Prophet's grave."
 
(Ayatullah Khomeini of Iran, while addressing a message for a youth rally).
 
Khomeinism and Islam,
 
page 8 by Abu Rehan Farooqi
 
This statement mirrors the attitude of hatred and contempt which Khomeini and his Shiahs cherish in particular for Ameerul Mu'mineen Sayyidina Abu Bakr and Ameerul Mu'mineen Sayyidina Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma), and about all the Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum) in general. While this is the vile and abominable attitude of Khomeini towards the illustrious Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum) of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), the Qur'an-e-Kareem states the attitude of Imaan in the following words:
 
"Muhammad is the Rasool of Allah, and those who are with him (i. e. the Sahabah) are stern against the kuffar and tender among themselves. You will see them (the Sahabah) in Ruku' and Sajdah searching for the grace of Allah and (His) Pleasure. Their sign is on their faces because of the impression of (abundance of) Sajdah... " (Surah Fath).
 
Most certainly, Allah was well pleased with the Mu'mineen (i.e. the Sahabah) when they took the oath of allegiance to you (0 Muhammad!) under the tree... (Surah Fath)
 
"And the early ones, the first one among the Muhajireen and Ansar and those who follow them (the Muhajireen and Ansar) in virtue, Allah is well pleased with them and they are well pleased with Him. Allah has prepared for them gardens beneath which flow rivers; therein will they dwell forever. Indeed, that is the great victory. " (SurahTaubah)
 
This is what the Qur'an says regarding the Sahabah, but the Shiah priests brand the Muhajireen and Ansar as kafir, murtad and munafiq! Nauthubillah!
 
And, Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said about the Sahabah:
 
"Fear Allah! Fear Allah regarding my Sahabah. Thus, whoever loves them, does so because of my love; whoever hates them, does so because of my hatred."
 
It is thus abundantly clear that Khomeini cherishes a dislike, an aversion, a hatred for the Sahabah because of his hatred for Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). The closer a Sahaabi was to Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), the viler the abuse and the greater the enmity the Shiahs demonstrate for him.
 
The noble Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum) are the foundation and the pivots of Islam. The entire basis and superstructure of Islam have been magnificently raised on the teachings, explanations and expositions of the Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum). The Qur'an Majeed itself has been authentically and authoritatively transmitted to the Ummah down the centuries in the form presented by the illustrious Sahabah - by Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthmaan (Radiallahu Anhum), the prime targets of Shi'i and Khomeini vituperation.
 
An abundance of Shi'i propaganda on the instructions of Khomeini is being churned out
by Iran. Such propaganda conducted under hollow and hypocritical slogans such as
(There is no Shi'ism and no Sunnism), is designed to mislead the Ummah of Islam into
acceptance of the Shi'i religion. Ignorance of what Shi'ism is, has constrained many
Muslims to incline towards Khomeini and Shi'ism. But, it shall, Insha Allah, be shown
that the vociferous "Islamic" slogans trumpeted by Khomeini and the Shi'i priests are
mere outer and superficial facades behind which lurk the darkness of kufr. In fact, the
intensity of Khomeini's and Shiah kufr is worse than the kufr of the Qadianis and other
baatil sects since the Shi'i religion is reared on hatred for the Sahabah (Radiallahu
Anhum). Without such hatred, there is no Shi'ism. Hatred for the Sahabah, which is an
overt and conspicuous facet of Shi'ism, is a doctrine of fundamental importance in the
Shiah religion. It is inconceivable to be a Shiah without subscribing to the doctrine of
aversion for and vituperation of the noble Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum) of Rasulullah
(sallallahu alayhi wasallam).
 
To open the eyes of the Sunni brethren of ours, who have been deceived by
Khomeini's propaganda machinery, we shall present here the views of the Shi'i religion -
views and statements extracted from the authoritative books of theology of the Shi'i
religion.
 
SHI'ISM AND THE SAHABAH
 
The most authentic book of theology of Shi'ism is Al-Jamiul Kafi. In this book in the section, Kitabur Raudha', the following narration is attributed to the fifth Shi', Imam:
 
"After Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) all people became murtads (reneged from Islam) except three persons - Miqdad Bin Aswad, Abu Tharr Ghifari and Salman Farsi Radiallahu Anhum wabarakatuhum). "
 
In the Shi'i book, Kitabur Raudhah, the following narration is attributed to Imam Baqir who allegedly made the statement in reply to his disciple who had sought the Imam's opinion regarding Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma)
 
"What are you asking me about them (Abu Bakr and Umar)? Whoever among us (i.e. the Ahle Bait or the progeny of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) departed from this world, departed in a state of extreme displeasure with them. The elders among us admonished the younger ones to perpetuate it (i.e. this displeasure with Abu Bakr and Umar), Verily, the two of them have unjustly usurped our right. By Allah! These two were the first to settle on our necks (i.e. the necks of the Ahle Bait). Therefore, may the la'nat (curse) of Allah, the Malaikah and of mankind be on the two of them.
 
(Kitabur Raudhah, Page 115)
 
In the same book, on the same page appears the following:
 
"Verily. these two elders (Abu Bakr and Umar) departed from this world without having made taubah for what they had perpetrated against Ameerul Mumineen Alayhis Salaam. In fact, they did not even think of us (of their wrongs against Hadhrat Ali). Therefore, the la'nat of Allah, the Malaikah and of mankind be on them."
 
In the Shiah book, Rijal Kashi, Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma) are denigrated in the following narration attributed to Imam Baqir:
 
"Whatever murder is committed in Islam, whatever unlawful wealth is earned and whatever adultery is committed until the appearance of our Imam Mahdi - the sin of all this is on the necks of the two (i.e. Abu Bakr and Umar).
 
(Rijal Kashi, page 135)
 
In Kitabur Raudhah on pages 159/160, the Shiahs attribute a narration to Hadhrat Salman Farsi (Radiallahu Anhu) in which it is claimed that on the occasion when the oath of allegiance was given to Hadhrat Abu Bakr (Radiallahu Anhu), the first person to swear allegiance to him was an old man who stepped forward crying:
 
"All praise to Allah who has not caused me to die yet, enabling me to see you on this pedestal. Stretch your hand. " Thus he (Abu Bakr) stretched his hand and the old man took the oath of allegiance (at his hand)."
 
According to the narration, when Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) heard this from Hadhrat Salman (Radiallahu Anhu), he asked:
 
"Do you know who he (the old man who took the oath of allegiance) is?"
 
When Salman (Radiallahu Anhu) replied in the negative, Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) allegedly said:
 
"That was Iblees, Allah has cursed him."
 
Thus, according to Shi'ism, the first being who accepted the Khilafat of Hadhrat Abu Bakr (Radiallahu Anhu) was Iblees who placed his hand in the hand of Hadhrat Abu Bakr (Radiallahu Anhu).
 
At the end of this narration in Kitabur Raudhah, the following words are attributed by the Shi'i priests to Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam).
 
"Then, they (a group of the Saqeefah Bani Saidah) will come to the Musjid (i.e. Musjid-e-Nabawi) and the first to swear allegiance to him (i.e. Abu Bakr) on my Mimbar will be Iblees, the La'nat of Allah on him. Iblees will appear (on that occasion) in the form of an old man and say so (i.e. what Salman Faarsi has allegedly said)."
 
Mullah Baqir Majlisi is a renowned personality in Shiah circles. He is regarded as a top-ranking Muhaddith. He flourished in the 10th century of the Hijri era. The Shi'i clergy has accorded him the title, Khatamul Muhadditheen (the seal of the Muhadditheen). His works are regarded as highly authoritative by the Shiah priests. Khomeini has praised and recommended his writings. This Shi'i priest, in his books, writes the following statements whenever he mentions the name of Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu)
 

"Umar Bin Khattab - on him be la'nat (curse) and athab (punishment).
 
This, then is the Shi'i attitude towards the beloved Sahabah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam).
 
This Mullah Baqir Majlisi has mentioned in his book, Zadul Ma'ad, numerous virtues and excellencies of the 9th of Rabiul Awwal. According to Baqir Majlisi, the significance and excellence of 9th Rabiul Awwal are because "Umar, the enemy of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the enemy of the Ahle Bait" will be killed on the 9th Rabiul Awwal. It is for this reason that the 9th of Rabiul Awwal should be observed as a great occasion of happiness and festivity according to Shi'ism. The relevant part of

 

 Search Facebook kufr: Meri Mohabbat Ki Haqeeqat Tum Kiya Jaano,Sir Jhukaya To TujheManga,Haath Uthaya To TujheMaanga…ayat_baloch....

Blogtrottr <busybee@blogtrottr.com> Jul 01 04:43PM +0100  

Search Facebook kufr
 
Search Facebook kufr
 
Meri Mohabbat Ki Haqeeqat Tum Kiya Jaano,
 
Sir Jhukaya To Tujhe
Manga,Haath Uthaya To Tujhe
Maanga…
 
ayat_baloch....
http://graph.facebook.com/526114310767533/picture
Jul 1st 2013, 15:01
 
Meri Mohabbat Ki Haqeeqat Tum Kiya Jaano,
 
Sir Jhukaya To Tujhe
Manga,Haath Uthaya To Tujhe
Maanga…
 
ayat_baloch....
 
 
 
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at http://blogtrottr.com
 
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe here:
http://blogtrottr.com/unsubscribe/gt/nZS8k4


 

Sie erhalten diese Nachricht, weil Sie in Google Groups die Gruppe 76j4725235b235b891248jv1 abonniert haben.
Sie können Posts per E-Mail erstellen.
Um Ihr Abonnement für diese Gruppe zu beenden, senden Sie eine leere Nachricht.
Für weitere Optionen besuchen Sie bitte diese Gruppe.

--
Sie haben diese Nachricht erhalten, weil Sie der Google Groups-Gruppe News2 beigetreten sind.
Um Ihr Abonnement für diese Gruppe zu beenden und keine E-Mails mehr von dieser Gruppe zu erhalten, senden Sie eine Email an 76j4725235b235b891248jv1+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Weitere Optionen: https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out